Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 8 of about 257 results (0.020 seconds)Meena Chatterjee Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7869/2013 & CM APPL. 16706/2013 MEENA CHATTERJEE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Advocate for NDMC. Reserved on :20. h August, 2014 Date of Decision :22. d September, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2013 issued by the Enforcement Department, New Delhi Municipal Council whereby it was decided to relocate the Tehbazari site allotted in favour of petitioners deceased husband from outside Supreme Court to a site near Patiala House due to security reasons. The relevant portion of the impugned order is reproduced hereinbelow:ORDER The Honble High Court in the case Laxmi Narain Vs N.D.M.C. & Ors. have directed the local authorities to allot a fresh site to the petitioners within a per...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Gupta Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Andors
Court: Delhi
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. d September, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6452/2014 NARENDER GUPTA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. for R1, R2, R4 and R5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby restraining the respondents, their representatives, assignees, officials, employees, nominees, etc. from taking forcible possession of the land ad-measuring 2 Bigha 17 Biswas out of Khasra bearing No.54/21/1 (1-14), 55/6/2/2 (2-12), 55/25/2/2 (0-8), 55/43/2 (0-16), 55/22/1 (3-1), 62/7/2 (2-12), 62/8/1 (1-16), 62/8/2 (0-4), 62/8/3 (2-16) and 114/2 (2-8) Khasra No.55/25/2 (1-0) situated in the revenue estate of village Bakhtawarpur, Delhi 36.2. On perusal of the present petition, it is revealed that vide notice dated 25.01.2014, respondent was d...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Santosh Sharma and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3806/2014 SMT SANTOSH SHARMA & ANR Through Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate ..... Petitioners versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Ginni Sehgal, Advocate with R2. Sub Inspector Vikrant Sharma. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.333/2013 registered on 01.11.2013 under Sections 380/448 IPC at police station Paschim Vihar at the instance of the second respondent; on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Ginni Sehgal, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The petitioners as well as the complainant are also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Vikrant Sharma.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to b...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Dunlop India Limited and anr Vs. Dr. Kamal Mitra Chenoy and anr
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:19. h September 2014. + FAO(OS) 413/2014 M/S DUNLOP INDIA LIMITED & ANR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. C. Mukund, Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain and Mr. Amit Kasera, Advocates Versus DR. KAMAL MITRA CHENOY & ANR Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath and Ms. Akanksha Singh Rohatgi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER1909.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in the present appeal is the composite order dated 24.07.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the appellant application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and Order 1 Rule 10, read with Section 151 CPC, while allowing the respondent/plaintiffs application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.2. The appellants principle grievance is that the respondent/plaintiff has joined two distinct cause of actions in one suit which arise out of two different agreements. Secon...
Tag this Judgment!Nisha Priya Bhatia Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL.)1889/2014 NISHA PRIYA BHATIA Represented by: .....Petitioner Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG instructed by Mr.Kirtiman Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG % ORDER1909.2014 Crl.M.A.Nos.14641-42/2014 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(Crl.) No.1889/2014 1. The petitioner was a member of the 1987 Batch of Executive Cadre Class I Officers under the Research and Analytical Wing until the year 2009, when she was compulsorily retired from service under a service rule which empowered the employer to retire from service a member of the service who exposes herself.2. As per the petitioner she was the victim of a conspiracy hatched against her by senior officers who were running a prostitution racket and were pushing her into the same. The petitioner has named a few officers in the annexures filed with the writ petition, whic...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender Mahawar @ Kalu @ Pawan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 19, 2014 + CRL.A. 1069/2014 JITENDER MAHAWAR @ KALU @ PAWAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate with Mr.Pulkit Misra and Ms.Namita Wali, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Anand Prakash, P.S.Vasant Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Holding appellant Jitender Mahawar @ Kalu @ Pawan guilty of the offence of having murdered Deepak Thapa, the learned Trial Judge has held that the testimony of Dinesh Kumar PW-1 establishes proof of the fact that Jitender and the juvenile co-accused K were in the company of the deceased at around 12 mid-night at the place where five hours after the dead body was found, attracts the genre of law concerning last scene. A jacket got recovered by the appellant on which human blood of Group O, same group as that of the deceased was the...
Tag this Judgment!Satbir Singh Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4260/2014 SATBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondent Mr. O. P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocate with respondent No.2 Sub Inspector Ram B. Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. 14728/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4260/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.181/2012 registered at police station Burari under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC; on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant as well the petitioner are also identified by the Investigating Officer...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Shah Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 19, 2014 + CRL.A. 1460/2012 PRADEEP SHAH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Murari Chaudhary and Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Veena Sharma, FRRO and SI Mahendra Koli, P.S.Subzi Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the testimony of Sangeeta PW-5 and Smt.Devki Devi PW- 6, finding corroboration from the testimony of Raj Kumar PW-1 and Smt.Kalpana Devi PW-2 and the fact that the appellant absconded after the incident, vide impugned decision dated December 02, 2008, the appellant has been convicted for the offence of having murdered his sister-in-law Gauri Devi.2. The only contention urged at the hearing of the appeal today is that DD No.3 Ex.PW-7/A, records that the informant has informed that near Khanna Market, Mithai Pul, near animal hosp...
Tag this Judgment!Hemdendra Agarwal and anr. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4261/2014 HEMDENDRA AGARWAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Vijay Chauhan and Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Complainant in person. Sub Inspector Badri Prasad. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.494/2004, registered at police station Connaught Place under Sections 409/418/420/424/468/471/477-A/120B IPC; on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor, enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1, 2 and 3. Respondent No.4 / complainant, who is present in person, also accepts notice. He is also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Badri Prasad.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the instance of...
Tag this Judgment!Bijender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : September 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 19, 2014 + CRL.A.857/2011 BIJENDER Represented by: .....Appellant Dr.Vijendra Mahndiya, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi and Mr.Jaideep Bhati, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.C.M.Meena, Addl.SHO, PS Kalyan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 07.20 P.M. on December 15, 2009, HC Durvesh Kumar PW-1, recorded DD No.17A, Ex.PW-1/A, noting therein that the wireless operator has informed that a gun-shot has been fired at a person by his brother at house bearing Municipal No.B-58-59, Gali No.6, Amar Vihar, Karawal Nagar, Delhi.2. Being handed over a copy of DD No.17A, accompanied by Ct.Rajesh PW-12, ASI Habib Ahmed PW-21, proceeded to Gali No.6, Amar Vihar, Karawal Nagar where they learnt that a ...
Tag this Judgment!