Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 6 of about 257 results (0.020 seconds)Anil Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 1389/2014, CMs 2899/2014 & CM152262014 ..Petitioners ANIL KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr T.N.Singh, Mr Vikas K.Singh and Mr H.L.Srivastava. For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for L&B/LAC. Mr Ajay Verma for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the subject lands are liable to be declared as being free from acquisition in view of the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act). He places reliance on recent decisions of this court in Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.: WP(C) No.2294/2014 decided on 12.09.2014 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Faiz Mohd. and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 24, 2014 + CRL.A. 534/2014 FAIZ MOHD. & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Relan, Mr.Prayas Aneja, Mr.Archit Vasudeva, Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Harpal Singh, PTS Wazirabad CRL.A. 777/2014 MOHD ANISH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Relan, Mr.Prayas Aneja, Mr.Archit Vasudeva, Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Insp.Harpal Singh, PTS Wazirabad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that whereas Crl.A.No.534/2014 filed by Faiz Mohd. and Salma, the father and mother respectively of Mohd.Anish has to be allowed, the matter needs to ...
Tag this Judgment!Hdfc Bank Ltd. Vs. Vardhman Precision Profiles and Tubes P. Ltd. and a ...
Court: Delhi
* 35 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TR.P.(CRL.) 68 of 2014 HDFC BANK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harsh Sinha and Ms. Swati Goswami, Advocates. versus VARDHMAN PRECISION PROFILES & TUBES P. LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2409.2014 Crl.M.A. No.15042 of 2014 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. TR.P. (Crl) 68 of 2014 & Crl.M.A. No.15041 of 2014 (for stay) 3. The Petitioner, HDFC Bank Limited, seeks by way of the present transfer petition, a direction that one of its cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) i.e CC No.2583 of 2014 titled HDFC Bank Limited v. Vardhman Precision Profiles & Tubes Pvt. Ltd., should continue to be tried in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi.4. The provocation for this petition is an order passed by the learned MM, Dwarka Courts o...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Pintoji Foods Pvt Ltd Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr
Court: Delhi
$-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA4672014 and CM No.11014/2014 Date of decision :24. h September, 2014 % M/S PINTOJI FOODS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr. K. Priyadarshi, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR ... Respondents Through : Mr. Sanjay Katyal and Mr. S.S. Katyal, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant before us had applied for financial assistance and facilities from the Punjab National Bank, respondent before us. Placing reliance on guidelines dated 1st November, 2012 issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the appellant had filed W.P.(C)No.2641/2013 complaining that the technical economic viability report of the appellant was not being examined by an appropriate authority. In that view of the matter, by an order dated 14th August, 2013 passed in W.P.(C)No.2641/2013, the learned Single Judge of this court has directed as follows:Considering the guidelines dated 01.11.201...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Soudan Singh Vs. University of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA3152014 and CM No.6644/2014 Date of decision :24. h September, 2014 % SHRI SOUDAN SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Shiv Ram Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 25 th November, 2013 of this court passed in W.P.(C)No.1492/2002. By this judgment, the learned Single Judge of this court modified the industrial award dated 27th February, 2001 directing the University of Delhi to reinstate the appellant workman with full backwages and continuity of service. Instead of this award, the learned Single Judge directed the award of compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the appellant. It was further directed that this amount of Rs.1,00,000/may not be adjusted against the amount paid by the University of Delhi in compliance with the order under Section 17B o...
Tag this Judgment!Rashidul Miyan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : September 23, 2014 + CRL.A. 34/2014 BASHEER ANSARI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey with Mr. Anuj Pal, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Manoj Pant with SI Kulbir, PS Gandhi Nagar CRL.A. 501/2014 RASHIDUL MIYAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Manoj Pant with SI Kulbir, PS Gandhi Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Holding that two motives for the crime, firstly, to get rid of Sheikh Sattar so that the absconder co-accused Sheikh Zahir would not have to pay the rent which was outstanding to the deceased and secondly to commit dacoity, has been proved by the prosecution; further holding that appellants Rashidul Miyan and Basheer Ansari have been p...
Tag this Judgment!Basheer Ansari Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : September 23, 2014 + CRL.A. 34/2014 BASHEER ANSARI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey with Mr. Anuj Pal, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Manoj Pant with SI Kulbir, PS Gandhi Nagar CRL.A. 501/2014 RASHIDUL MIYAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Manoj Pant with SI Kulbir, PS Gandhi Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Holding that two motives for the crime, firstly, to get rid of Sheikh Sattar so that the absconder co-accused Sheikh Zahir would not have to pay the rent which was outstanding to the deceased and secondly to commit dacoity, has been proved by the prosecution; further holding that appellants Rashidul Miyan and Basheer Ansari have been p...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~3, 4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 23, 2014 + CRL.A. 32/2012 RAJESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 36/2012 RAMESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 66/2012 VADIWEL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate with Mr.Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Rajesh Kumar, his father Ramesh Kumar and Vadiwel, a bosom pal o...
Tag this Judgment!Neera Singh Vs. Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6511/2014 & CM Nos. 15546-47/2014 NEERA SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sachin Puri, Advocate with Mr.Dheeraj Gupta, Advocate versus JM FINANCIAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER % 23.09.2014 C.M No.15547/2014 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6511/2014 & CM No.15546/2014 Neera Singh, who is defendant No.3 in the original proceedings has filed the present writ petition impugning order dated 08.09.2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT, in short) in Misc. Appeal No.335/2014. The impugned order upholds the order passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal dated 14.08.2014 rejecting the petitioners prayer for cross examination of witnesses who have filed evidence by way of affidavits.2. The petitioner herein claims that she is former wife of Joel Waldman...
Tag this Judgment!Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr Vs. Atul Bhardwaj
Court: Delhi
$-10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3272014 Date of decision :23. d September, 2014 % GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... APPELLANTS Through : Ms. Zubeda Begum, standing counsel (GNCTD) versus ATUL BHARDWAJ Through : ...... RESPONDENT Mr. Rajpal Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal relates to appointment of the respondent Dr. Atul Bhardwaj to the post of Lecturer in Shalakya Tantra in the Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Ayurvedic Charak Sansthan (hereinafter referred to as the Sansthan), appellant no.2 herein. The brief facts giving rise to the instant appeal to the extent necessary are set down hereafter:2. We are informed by Ms. Zubeda Begum, learned standing counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi that the Ch. Brahm Prakash Ayurvedic Charak Sansthan is an autonomous institute registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 which is fully financed and controlled by the Govt. of NCT of Delh...
Tag this Judgment!