Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 257 results (0.055 seconds)Aditya Barna Mittra and ors Vs. Aditya Barna Mittra and ors
Court: Delhi
$~41. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 9.2014 + TEST.CAS. 44/2014 ADITYA BARNA MITTRA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Jasmeet Singh and Ms.Kritika Mehra, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.Sistani, J.,(Oral) 1. By the present petition filed under Section 272 of the Indian Succession Act the petitioners seek grant of letters of administration with respect to the estate of their uncle (Chacha), late Sh.Bijoy Pratap Mittra (B.P. Mittra).2. Notice in the present petition was issued to the State. Valuation report has been received. Publication was also carried out in The Statesman, Delhi Edition. Copy of citation has been filed. All the close relations are stated to be petitioners in the petition. No objections have been received from the public at large.3. Petitioners have filed affidavit by way of evidence of one Sh.A.B. Mitra, one of the petitioners, the said affidavit has been exhibited as Exhibit PW-...
Tag this Judgment!Cpl B S Siddha Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:18. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) No.554/2014 CPL B S SIDDHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Pandey and Mr.H.S. Tiwari, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner, a Corporal in the Indian Air Force, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking: i) a direction against respondent Nos.1 to 4 to discharge him from his present service; and ii) a direction against respondent No.5 CRPF to not cancel his candidature, for having not completed seven years of service as on the date of submission of his application for seeking appointment in a Group A post as Assistant Commandant.2. Mr. S.S.Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is strikingly similar to t...
Tag this Judgment!Abhishik Singh Vs. Shehnaz Begum and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 74/2012 Date of Decision :17. h September, 2014 % ABHISHIK SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pramod Ahuja, Advocate versus SHEHNAZ BEGUM & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Mr.N.K. Jain, Adv for defendants 1 to 7 Mr.Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr.VIpin, Singh, Advocates for defendants No.8 to 12. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16224/2012 (u/O.12 Rule 6 CPC) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking cancellation of sale deed dated 11.6.2009 which has been executed by defendants no.8 to 12 in favour of defendants no.1 to 7; and also symbolic possession given by defendants no.8 to 12 in favour of defendants no.1 to 7.2. Plaintiff has filed the present application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree on admission.3. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this application and as set out in the plaint are that one Smt.Pratibha Singh was the owner of the property bearing No.836 - 837 (ol...
Tag this Judgment!Bodh Nath Mishra Vs. the Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 645/2014 BODH NATH MISHRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha & Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Gogana, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advocate for the UOI along with S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer & B.K. Rout, Pairvi Officer. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % ORDER1709.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks (i) issuance of a writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari quashing his dismissal order which was passed against him about 17 years ago, i.e., by an order dated 06.12.1997 by respondent No.2 and (ii) issuance of a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Constable in CRPF w.e.f. 06.12.1997 alongwith all the consequential benefits ari...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Pal Vs. the Honble Lt. Governor and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3673/2014 and CM No.7449/2014 RAJ PAL ... Petitioner versus THE HONBLE LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr L.K. Singh For the Respondents : Mr Rakesh Khanna, Sr Advocate with Mr Ajay Verma for the DDA. Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Siddharth Panda, Mr Govind Kumar, Mr Anshuman Nayak, and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for the Respondent/L&B and LAC. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014.2. The award in respect of the petitioners land was passed on 28.02.1967 vide Award No.1953/1967 un...
Tag this Judgment!Amarjeet Malik Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:17. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) 7255/2013 AMARJEET MALIK Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate W.P.(C) 8057/2013 RAKESH KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Parmod Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate versus THE CHAIRMAN, STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Anita Mohan, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 17.09.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. The short question which falls for consideration in these two writ petitions is whether the respondent Staff Selection Commission (SSC) could legitimately introduce a fresh criteria for qualifying the interview process i.e., 25% for unreserved category and 20% for other categories when no such condition ...
Tag this Judgment!Poonam Arora Vs. Surender Kapoor and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 621/2011 Date of decision :17. h September, 2014 % POONAM ARORA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocates versus SURENDER KAPOOR & ORS Through: None ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction. Summons were issued in the suit on 14.03.2011. Defendant nos. 1, 4 and 5 entered appearance on 05.07.2011 through their counsel. Defendant nos. 1, 4 and 5 filed their respective written statements.2. Defendant nos. 2 and 3 were served through publication in newspapers Veer Arjun and The Hindu dated 11.05.2012. However, none appeared for defendant nos. 2 and 3. Consequently, defendant nos. 2 and 3 were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 04.10.2012. Admission/denial of documents was concluded on 15.02.2013. Further, vide order dated 29.05.2014, defendant nos. 1,4 and 5 were also proceeded ex parte for non appear...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 17, 2014 + CRL.A. 1533/2013 SANJAY KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Mittal, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Sanjay has been convicted for having murdered Dhananjay and Akshay vide judgment dated August 29, 2013 and as per order dated September 03, 2013 has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine in sum of `1 lakh, upon realization to be paid to the family of the deceased as compensation.2. The conviction has been sustained on the testimony of Rishi PW-4.3. The PCR log Ex.PW-2/A would evidence that at 20:20:19 hours on October 24, 2009, Rishi PW-4 had informed of acid burn being caused at factory No.H-71, Bawana Industrial Area. The said PCR log would further evidence that a Poli...
Tag this Judgment!Ex. Constable Manik Lal Singh Vs. the Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 212/2013 EX. CONSTABLE MANIK LAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. H.P. Chakravorti, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % ORDER1709.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks (i) issuance of a writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari quashing/setting aside of the Charge Memorandums dated 22.01.2009 and 13.04.2011 and (ii) issuance of a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for financial upgradation under ACP/MACP Schemes besides his promotion to the post of Head Constable and Assistant Sub-Inspector with all consequential benefits of arrears of pay and allowances along with interest @ 18% per annum.2. In the counte...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Bhagwan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 17, 2014 + CRL.A. 650/2000 JAI BHAGWAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Having perused the evidence as also the impugned decision dated July 10, 2000 convicting appellant for the offence of having murdered Ajay, it is apparent that the learned Trial Judge has not kept in mind the post-mortem report Ex.PW-7/A of deceased Ajay authored by Dr.B.P.S.Karv PW-7.2. This has vitiated the conclusion.3. Post-mortem report Ex.PW-7/A would evidence that Dr.B.P.S.Karv detected bleeding from the nose and mouth of Ajay. He saw a brownish abrasion on the right temple 4 cm x 2 cm with clotted blood present. He saw multiple abrasions on both knees, left wrist, left shoulder. They were reddish brown in colour. Clotted blood wa...
Tag this Judgment!