Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 3 of about 257 results (0.032 seconds)Gurmeet Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: September 29, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1138/2014 GURMEET SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with inspector Rajesh Kumar, PS Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Gurmeet Singh is convicted of the murder of his sister Kanwaljeet Kaur by inflicted head injury on her by a hammer. He assails the judgment on the ground that the FIR was registered belatedly after a period of two months, no blood was recovered on the hammer as per the seizure memo, however, strangely enough FSL report notes presence of blood on the hammer. The witnesses have stated that the deceased received injuries due to fall as told to them by the deceased. The learned Trial Court wrongly discarded the dying declaration. The injuries were compa...
Tag this Judgment!Paras Dyes and Chemicals and ors. Vs. Pradyot Kumar Ghosh and ors
Court: Delhi
$~2-4 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 636/2006 Date of decision :29. h September, 2014 % PARAS DYES & CHEMICALS & ORS. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Vivek Singh & Mr.Dhruv Gupta, Advs versus PRADYOT KUMAR GHOSH & ORS. ..... Defendant Through Mr.Rama Shankar for defendants 1-3 Mr.Rishi Manchanda for D45/applicants +2 CS(OS) 637/2006 PARAS DYES & CHEMICALS & ORS. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Vivek Singh & Mr.Dhruv Gupta, Advs versus PRADYOT KUMAR GHOSH & ORS. ..... Defendant Through Mr.Rama Shankar for defendants 1-3 Mr.Rishi Manchanda for D45/applicants +3 CS(OS) 638/2006 PARAS DYES & CHEMICALS & ORS. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Vivek Singh & Mr.Dhruv Gupta, Advs versus PRADYOT KUMAR GHOSH & ORS. ..... Defendant Through Mr.Rama Shankar for defendants 1-3 Mr.Rishi Manchanda for D45/applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) I.A.14934/2013 in CS(OS) 636/2006 I.A.14936/2013 in CS(OS) 637/2006 I.A.14932/2013 in CS(OS) 638/2006 1. By the present a...
Tag this Judgment!Cpl Saurabh Fauzdar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:29. h September 2014 + W.P. (C) No.5112/2013 CPL SAURABH FAUZDAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + Through: W.P. (C) No.5248/2013 CPL SUNIL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms.Kimmi Brara, Advocate for Respondents W.P. (C) No.2803/2014 CPL SACHIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate and Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 3. + W.P. (C) No.5639/2014 VINEET KUMAR Through: Petitioner Mr. Zeyaul Haque, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Puja Sarkar and Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Advocates for Respondents. CORAM: HON'B...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Gupta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 679/2012 SUBHASH GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate with Mr.Pulkit Misra, Ms.Namita Wali, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10652/2014 1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the limited point which he needs to address is whether the act of the appellant constitutes the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC or 304 Part I IPC. Counsel states that everything turns on the testimony of the mother of the appellant, who is also the mother of the deceased Smt.Ram Dulari PW-1. Counsel states that if appeal itself could be heard today he does not press Crl.M.B.10652/2014 whereunder the appellant seeks bail pending final hearing of the appeal.2. We have accordingly decided to hear argum...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6672/2014 Decided on :29. 09.2014 IN THE MATTER OF UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms. Noor Anand and Mr. Rupinder Pal Singh, Advocates versus NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate with Mr. Shyam Sunder Jindal and Mr. G.P.Singh, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/UOI, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare praying inter alia for quashing of the order dated 05.08.2014 passed by the respondent No.1/National Commission for Scheduled Castes.2. By the impugned order dated 05.08.2014, the respondent No.1/Commission has disposed of a complaint dated 05.10.2009 filed by the respondent No.2, seeking the following reliefs:1. Department should withdraw their show cause notice issued on arbitrary grounds or accept my reply as was a...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Kumar Meena Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 408/2014 RAVI KUMAR MEENA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Amit Kala, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A. 1075/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP versus RAVI KUMAR MEENA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Amit Kala, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. At about 8:50 PM on March 23, 2009, the duty officer at PS Anand Parbat recorded information conveyed by L/Ct.Anuradha from the Police Control Room that ringing up the number 100, information was given that at Street No.8 Nehru Nagar, Anand Parbat during a quarrel stabbing has taken place.2. Recorded in the daily diary at number 74B, Ex.PW-11/A, copy of the daily diary entry was handed over by the duty officer to SI Su...
Tag this Judgment!Dharmender Kumar Paswan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 1140/2014 DHARMENDER KUMAR PASWAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Girish Kumar Singh, ATO, PS Okhla Industrial Area CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Dharmender Kumar Paswan the appellant, has been convicted vide impugned decision dated July 23, 2013 for the offence of having murdered his live-in partner Sudha. He has also been convicted for causing evidence of the commission of the offence to disappear with the intention to screen himself as an offender. Vide order on sentence dated August 01, 2013, for the offence of murder he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay find in sum of `10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. For the offence punishable unde...
Tag this Judgment!M/S H M Industries Vs. Commissioner of Value Addes Tax
Court: Delhi
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 26, 2014 + ST.APPL. 32/2013 M/S H M INDUSTRIES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advocate with Mr.Virag Tiwari, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDES TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) This appeal under Section 81 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act,2004 (DVAT Act, for short), read with Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act for short) pertains to the 4th quarter return for the tax period 2006-07.2. The substantial question of law admitted for hearing vide order dated 14.08.2013 reads as under:Whether VAT Tribunal was right in holding that proviso to Section 34(1) is applicable to the facts of the present case?.3. By the impugned order dated 14.06.2013 the Appellate Tribunal, Value Added Tax (Tribunal, for short), Delhi has held that the d...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Sukhbir Singh and ors. Vs. Smt. Gaindo Devi and Others
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 07.2014 Pronounced on:26. 09.2014 + RFA (OS) 30/1974, C.M. APPL.2730/2014 SHRI SUKHBIR SINGH AND ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Sh. Pramod Kumar Seth and Sh. Vineet Seth, Advocate. Versus SMT. GAINDO DEVI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Sh. B.B. Gupta, Sh. Udyan Srivastava and Sh. Sarthak Ghonkrokta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal by the plaintiffs challenges a judgment and decree of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Suit No.643/1966 dated 07.06.1974. The impugned judgment dismissed the plaintiffs claim for partition, declaration and rendition of accounts.2. The undisputed facts emerging from the pleadings are that Mare Singh, son of Pat Ram had six children three sons (Bharat Singh, first defendant; Om Mittar, second defendant and Om Prakash, who predeceased Mare Singh) and three daughters (Chanderwati,...
Tag this Judgment!Gyanwat Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 1423/2014 & CM29572014 ... Petitioner GYANWAT versus Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent L&B For the Respondent GNCTD For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent : Mr N.S.Vasisht, Mr Vishal Singh, Ms Jyoti Kataria, Ms Madhur Bhargava. : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, : Mr Ajay Verma : Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The case of the petitioner is admittedly covered by the decision of this court in Gyanender Singh & Ors. v.UOI & Ors.: WPC13932014...
Tag this Judgment!