Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 7 of about 257 results (0.021 seconds)Om Prakash and ors. Vs. Lt.Governor Cum Administrator and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3066/2013 & CM Nos.5802/2013, 2045/2014 OM PRAKASH & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus LT.GOVERNOR CUM ADMINISTRATOR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondents : Mr Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Jain and Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Advocates. : Ms Renuka Arora, Advocate for DSIDC. Ms Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for DDA. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act). The learned senior counsel for the petitioners states that the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors. : W.P.(C) No.2294/2014 decide...
Tag this Judgment!Gyanender Singh and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 1393/2014 and CM No.2905/2014 ... Petitioners GYANENDER SINGH & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S Vasisht, Mr Vishal Singh, Mr Madhur Prabhat Bhargava and Ms Jyoti Karatia For the Respondents : Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj and Mr T.P Singh for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr Ajay Verma for the DDA. Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Siddharth Panda, Mr Govind Kumar, Mr Anshuman Nayak, and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for the Respondent/L&B and LAC. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~3, 4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 23, 2014 + CRL.A. 32/2012 RAJESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 36/2012 RAMESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 66/2012 VADIWEL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate with Mr.Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Rajesh Kumar, his father Ramesh Kumar and Vadiwel, a bosom pal o...
Tag this Judgment!Vadiwel Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~3, 4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 23, 2014 + CRL.A. 32/2012 RAJESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 36/2012 RAMESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CRL.A. 66/2012 VADIWEL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate with Mr.Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Rajesh Kumar, his father Ramesh Kumar and Vadiwel, a bosom pal o...
Tag this Judgment!Nrb Bearings Limited Vs. Windsor Export
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :8. h August, 2014 % Judgment pronounced on:22. d September, 2014 + I.A. No.3412/2010 in CS(OS) No.480/2010 NRB BEARINGS LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Adv. with Mr.Arnav Kumar, Ms.Malavika Lal, Ms.Aditi Mohan & Ms.Roshni Namboodiry, Advs. versus WINDSOR EXPORT Through ..... Defendant Mr.Manu T. Ramachandran, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the pending interim application being I.A. No.3412/2010 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC in a suit for permanent injunction restraining defendant from using the website name nrbearing.com.2. The case of the plaintiff is that plaintiff is a renowned company in the business of manufacturing needle roller bearings, ball bearings and various other types of roller bearings which are used in the automotive industry and all other engineering industries to re...
Tag this Judgment!JatIn Walia and ors Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4288/2014 JATIN WALIA & ORS Through Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocate. ..... Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. Sumit Nanda, Advocate for R2. Sub Inspector Pradeep Rawat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.C. No.4288/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.14824/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.114/2008 registered on 13.03.2008 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at police station Sarojini Nagar; on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Sumit Nanda, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The petitioners as well as the complainant are also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Pradeep Rawat.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to ...
Tag this Judgment!Zahid and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: September 22, 2014 + CRL.A. 975/2013 ZAHID & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Riaz Mohd., Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Rizwan Khan, PS Seelam Pur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A ladder is a vertical or inclined set of rungs or steps. It is an object used to climb and achieve heights, but sometimes, before jumping into a pit it may also be used after it is lowered in the pit, but before one jumps into the pit, to climb out of the pit. Never have we heard of a ladder sucking people into the void beyond life and being the cause for a few to lose their liberty. A wise man does not need a ladder, because he is a ladder himself. Regretfully neither side in the instant case appears to be wise nor do they appear to be aware of what a ladder is meant for. The h...
Tag this Judgment!Dharam Chand Vs. Chairman New Delhi Municipal Council and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 340/2014 & CM APPL. 668/2014 DHARAM CHAND Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Tripurari Ray, Advocate with Mr. Anil Kaushik and Mr. Rajinder Singh, Advocates versus CHAIRMAN NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Advocate with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Amiet Andley, Advocate for Delhi Police. Reserved on :20. h August, 2014 Date of Decision :22. d September, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2013 issued by the Enforcement Department, New Delhi Municipal Council whereby it has been decided to relocate the petitioner from his existing site outside Supreme Court to a site near Gate of Baroda House adjacent to the existing stalls due to security reasons. The relevant ORDER The Honble High Court in the case Laxmi Narain Vs N.D.M.C. & Ors. ...
Tag this Judgment!Urmila Devi Sharma and ors. Vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (Since Deceased) T ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:18. 09.2014 Judgement delivered on:22. 09.2014. % + IA No.15579/2014 in CS(OS) 221/2008 URMILA DEVI SHARMA & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs versus PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA (since deceased) THROUGH LRS. ..... Defendant ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE For the plaintiffs: Mr Pravir K. Jain, Advocate. For the defendant: Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr Sushil Shukla & Mr Sambhav Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.15579/2014 (O. 14 R. 5 of CPC by Defendant) 1. This is an application filed under Order 14 Rule 5 of the CPC. By this application the applicant/ defendant (who has deceased and is now represented by his legal heirs) seeks reformulation of issue nos. 4 and 10 and the reversal of onus vis-a-vis issue No.8, which has been placed on the applicant/ defendant.2. Notice in this application was issued by me, on 20.08.2014. Mr Pravir Jain appeared for the plaintiff and has decided to argue...
Tag this Judgment!V2 Corp and anr. Vs. Innovative Techpack Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9. h September, 2014 Judgment pronounced on:22. d September, 2014 % + I.A. No.14725/2014 & I.A. No.16523/2014 in CS(OS) No.2357/2014 V2 CORP & ANR. Through Plaintiffs Mr.Sudhir Chandra Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chetan Chadha & Mr. Sharabh Srivastava, Advs. versus INNOVATIVE TECHPACK LIMITED Through Defendant Mr. C.M.Lall, Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit for permanent injunction, infringement of designs, damages and delivery etc. has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendant in respect of design No.221746 registered as of 17th March, 2009 and design No.253936 registered as of 17th May, 2013. Alongwith the suit, plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC being I.A. 14725/2014.2. The suit alongwith said interim application was listed before Court on 8th August, 2014. After hearing, detailed ex-parte ord...
Tag this Judgment!