Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 12 of about 257 results (0.010 seconds)Commissioner of Income Tax-x Vs. Smt Paramjeet Luthra
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h September, 2014 + ITA5962014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-X ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SMT PARAMJEET LUTHRA Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Present appeal relates to assessment year 2007-08 and impugns order dated 7th February, 2014, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. The respondent-assessee an individual had shown returned income of Rs.2,85,924/-, for the assessment year in question. Assessing Officer, vide its order dated 24.12.1999, had made additions and enhanced the income to Rs.65,63,039/- on various counts. The, present appeal is concerned with addition of Rs.60,70,492/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). The ITA5962014 respondent-assessee, as proprietor Page 1 of 11 of M/s International Surgical Agency, had ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar Pathak and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4159/2014 RAJESH KUMAR PATHAK & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with SI Naresh Kumar, PS Swarup Nagar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.183/2014 under Sections 307/34 IPC registered at Police Station Swaroop Nagar on 23rd April, 2014, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2 are present in person, and are identified by IO SI Naresh Kumar.4. It is stated that the FIR came to be lodged as a result of an altercation at a shop being run by the petitioners with re...
Tag this Judgment!indu Soni Vs. State and Others
Court: Delhi
$~48. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 28/2013 % Judgment dated INDU SONI Through :15. 09.2014 ..... Petitioner Ms.Deeksha L. Kakkar, Adv. versus STATE AND OTHERS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Singh, Adv. for Objector, Ms.Uma Sharma. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, for grant of succession certificate in favour of the petitioner with respect to movable assets of late Sh.Jagdish Kumar Soni.2. According to the petitioner, the testator, Sh.Jagdish Kumar Soni died intestate leaving behind his wife and three daughters. This petition is filed by the wife and daughters have been arrayed as respondents no.2 to 4. Respondents no.2 to 4 have filed their affidavits deposing that they have no objection if a succession certificate is issued in favour of the petitioner herein with respect to the movable properties.3. Objections have been...
Tag this Judgment!S Srinivas Raju Vs. S Ravi Raju and anr
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :15th September, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1711/2010 S SRINIVAS RAJU Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Subhash Oberoi, Advocate versus S RAVI RAJU & ANR ..... Defendant Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2, were issued on 25.08.2010. Defendant no.2 entered appearance on 28.11.2010 and sought time to file written statement. Fresh summons were issued to defendant no.1 on 28.10.2010, 04.02.2011 and 25.04.2011. Thereafter, plaintiff filed an application under Order 22 Rule 4 for bringing legal representative of defendant no.1 on record as defendant no.1 expired on 16.05.2011. Legal representative of defendant no.1, Ms. Prasanna Surabhi was impleaded on 07.02.2012. None has chosen to contest the matter. Statement of defendant no.2 was recorded on...
Tag this Judgment!S K Mittal Vs. the Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
* #26 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 450 of 2011 & Crl. M.A. 4157 of 2011 S K MITTAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Uttam Dutt and Mr. Siddhartha Kalita, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Ms. Niti Jain, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER1509.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24th December 2010 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) in Appeal No.283 of 2009 confirming the adjudication order (AO) dated 24th March 2004 finding the Appellant guilty of the offence under Sections 6(4), 6(5) 8(1), 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(f)(i) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,00,00,000 on him.2. According to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Mr. Subhash Sethi, a resident of 121, Oakdale Drive, Heald Green, Cheshire, SK3SN UK, was maintaining a Non Resident External (NRE) Account No.320169733 with ...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ishwar Singh
Court: Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) 6123/2014, C.M. NOS. 14863-14865/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..Petitioner Through : Sh. Anand-Nandan, Advocate. Versus ISHWAR SINGH Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. NO.14863 & 14865/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 6123/2014, C.M. NO.14864/2014 (for stay) 1. The petitioner, the Delhi Transport Corporation (hereafter DTC) in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions an order dated 08.03.2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal), in O.A. No.1069/2012 which directed it to consider the claim of the respondent for reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred by him in W.P.(C) 6123/2014 Page 1 connection with his wifes ailment w.e.f. 24.12.2008 and to pass appropriate orders within four weeks ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Continental Construction Ltd. and anr Vs. State Bank of India and ...
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 15, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6090/2014 & CM No.14812/2014 M/S CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.BhoumikNayyar, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS Through: .... Respondent Mr.S.L.Gupta, Mr.J.P.Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % 1. ORDER1509.2014 At the outset, we may record that petitioner No.2, M.S. Bassi, is not a defendant in O.A. No.37 and 39/1998. M.S. Bassi has been arrayed as petitioner No.2 as he is the Director of the petitioner No.1 company. Therefore, we will treat the present petition filed by petitioner No.1 only, as we are only concerned with proceedings in O.A. Nos. 37 and 39/1998 2. Pursuant to the last order, copy of the order dated 02.09.2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi (DRT) has been placed before us. The said order does not record the presence of the coun...
Tag this Judgment!Abir Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Teesta Valley Power Transmissi ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : September 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 15, 2014 FAO(OS) 397/2014 CONSORTIUM OF DEEPAK CABLE INDIA LIMITED & ABIR INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED (DCIL-AIPL) THR ABIR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayyar and Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocates instructed by Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Shaan Mohan and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates versus TEESTAVALLEY POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Mr.Amarjeet Singh Chandhiok and Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocates instructed by Ms.Haripriya Padmanabhan, Mr.Aman Garg, Mr.Vaibhav Jain, Mr.Abhimanyu Garg and Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Advocates FAO(OS) 398/2014 ABIR INFRASTRUCUTURE PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayyar and Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Shaan Mohan and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates versus TEESTAVALLEY POWER TRANSMISION LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.Abh...
Tag this Judgment!C Shanti Anandam Vs. Jvg Finance
Court: Delhi
$~1 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h September, 2014 % + CO.APP. 48/2014 & CM Nos.14706-14708/2014 C SHANTI ANANDAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator CO.APP. 49/2014 CM No.14755-14757/2014 S.BJYOTHSNA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus J.V.G. FINANCE ;LTD Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. CO.APP. 44/2014 & CM Nos.14070-14073/2014 V RAJSHEKHAR REDDY Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through :1. ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. + CO.APP. 45/2014 & CM Nos.14074-14077/2014 UMA SHANKAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through : + CO.APP. 46/2014 & CM Nos.14080-14083/2014 K.M.PATTAMMAL Through : versus J.V.G.FINANCE LTD. Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. ..... Appellant Mr...
Tag this Judgment!S.Bjyothsna Vs. J.V.G. Finance ;ltd
Court: Delhi
$~1 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h September, 2014 % + CO.APP. 48/2014 & CM Nos.14706-14708/2014 C SHANTI ANANDAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator CO.APP. 49/2014 CM No.14755-14757/2014 S.BJYOTHSNA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus J.V.G. FINANCE ;LTD Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. CO.APP. 44/2014 & CM Nos.14070-14073/2014 V RAJSHEKHAR REDDY Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through :1. ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. + CO.APP. 45/2014 & CM Nos.14074-14077/2014 UMA SHANKAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus JVG FINANCE Through : + CO.APP. 46/2014 & CM Nos.14080-14083/2014 K.M.PATTAMMAL Through : versus J.V.G.FINANCE LTD. Through : + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, official liquidator. ..... Appellant Mr...
Tag this Judgment!