Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 26 of about 257 results (0.019 seconds)Alam Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2177/2013 ALAM SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Hameed S. Shaikh, Mr. Amar Pal, Mr. Pramod Kumar & Ms. Nisha Rawat, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. Akshay Govt. Standing UOI with Mr. Officer, CRPF % ..... Respondents Makhija, Central Counsel for the S.S. Sejwal, Law CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER0109.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 08.03.2013 passed by the Central Information Commission and to hold that the information sought by the petitioner is not exempted under Section 24 of the RTI Act; issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to place on record the information sought by the petitioner through RTI from the responde...
Tag this Judgment!State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Farukh @ Koyal and anr
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 389/2014 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. versus FARUKH @ KOYAL & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER0109.2014 % Crl.M.A.No.9833/2014 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 69 days in filing the leave petition is condoned. CRL.L.P. 389/2014 1. The State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated December 12, 2013 acquitting the respondents Farukh @ Koyal and Danish for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC for allegedly committing the murder of one Sonu in furtherance to their common intention along with their co-accused Rizwan (PO) and S, a juvenile.2. The case of the prosecution is that an information was received at about 11.30 PM on February 04, 2009 recorded vide DD No.45/A at Police Station Shahdara that at 749/1 Rehman Building, West ...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Azad Alam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~6, 7, 9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 629/2013 MOHD.AZAD ALAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Bhupinder Mehtani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 888/2013 MOHD.ARIF Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajat Sharma, Advocate. versus + STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 1132/2013 SHAHJAD Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: CRL.A.Nos.629/2013, 888/2013, 1132/2013 & 418/2013 ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. + CRL.A. 418/2014 SARFARAJ @ SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the S...
Tag this Judgment!Sarfaraj @ Sonu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~6, 7, 9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 629/2013 MOHD.AZAD ALAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Bhupinder Mehtani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 888/2013 MOHD.ARIF Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajat Sharma, Advocate. versus + STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 1132/2013 SHAHJAD Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: CRL.A.Nos.629/2013, 888/2013, 1132/2013 & 418/2013 ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. + CRL.A. 418/2014 SARFARAJ @ SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the S...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Silor Associates S.A.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : August 20, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 01, 2014 + FAO(OS) 370/2014 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Prashant Mehta, Ms.Priya Pathania, Ms.Hasleen Singh, Mr.Abhimanyu, Advocates versus SILOR ASSOCIATES S.A. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.A.K.Sengupta, Mr.Suraj Prakash, Mr.Ashish Dixit, Ms.Deblina Sengupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 reads as under:27. Court assistance in taking evidence. (1) The arbitral tribunal, or a party with the approval of the arbitral tribunal, may apply to the Court for assistance in taking evidence. (2) The application shall specify (a) the names and addresses of the parties and the arbitrators; (b) the general nature of the claim and the relief sought; (c) the evide...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Arif Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~6, 7, 9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 629/2013 MOHD.AZAD ALAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Bhupinder Mehtani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 888/2013 MOHD.ARIF Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajat Sharma, Advocate. versus + STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CRL.A. 1132/2013 SHAHJAD Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: CRL.A.Nos.629/2013, 888/2013, 1132/2013 & 418/2013 ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the Kanwar Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. + CRL.A. 418/2014 SARFARAJ @ SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the S...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Mustkim Ansari Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : August 27, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on :September 01, 2014 + CRL.A.827/2014 MOHD.MUSTKIM ANSARI .....Appellant Represented by: Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Rajesh Kumar, SHO/Begum Pur and SI Mahabir Prasad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. HC Anand Prakash PW-15 was the duty officer from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM at PS Begumpur on April 27, 2012. At 9:48 AM he received information from the police control room that foul smell was emanating from a house in Rajiv Nagar, Begumpur, Delhi. He made an entry No.29B, Ex.PW-15/A in the daily diary. He handed over a copy of the said daily diary entry to Ct.Vimal Kumar PW-20 to be handed over to SI Chetan PW-24. SI Chetan left the police station accompanied by Ct.Vimal and Ct.Harish (not examined) and reached House No.A-82A, Rajiv Nagar, Begumpur, Delhi a...
Tag this Judgment!