Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 11 of about 257 results (0.019 seconds)M/S Rajat Leasingh Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
$~95 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 4177/2014 & CM No.8377/2014 M/S RAJAT LEASINGH LTD ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Deepak Khosla, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms Mrinalini Sen Gupta, Advocate with Ms Ruchi Chopra, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-3/DDA Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Siddharth Panda, Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Anshuman Nayak, Advocates for R-4 & R-5/ L&B and LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition pr...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Yahya and ors Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
$~88(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3843/2014 & CM77452014 MOHD. YAHYA & ORS ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ravinder Sethi, Sr Advocate with Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for the Respondent/L&B and LAC. Ms Shobhana Takiar for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Shyam Sunder and anr. Vs. Rakavi Hospitality and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:16. h September, 2014 + CS (OS) No.2026/2013 SHYAM SUNDER & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Dua, Adv. & Mr. Uday Joshi, Adv. Versus RAKAVI HOSPITALITY & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. MITTAL,J.(Oral) IA No.3092/2014 (O.XII Rule 6 CPC) in CS (OS) No.2026/2013 1. Reply to the application has not been filed by the Defendants despite opportunity being granted to them.2. This suit for possession, recovery of rent, mesne profits, permanent and mandatory injunction was filed by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants with the averments that Defendant no.1, which is a partnership firm of Defendants no.2 and 3, was inducted as a tenant in the second floor of the property bearing no.N-11, Market Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048, measuring 1765 sq.ft. w.e.f. 01.05.2012 by a registered Lease Deed dated 23.04.2012. Initially, the rate of re...
Tag this Judgment!Haji Construction Co. Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3844/2014 & CM77472014 HAJI CONSTRUCTION CO. ..Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana. For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Mr Sunil Kr. Jha and Ms Kiran Pathak for respondent Nos.1 &2. Mr Arjun Pant for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that th...
Tag this Judgment!Veena Mahajan and anr Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
$~84(III+I) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3729/2014 & CM75512014 VEENA MAHAJAN & ANR ..... Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B. S. Maan For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha and Mrs Kiran Pathak for the Respondent/L&B and LAC Mr Ajay Verma for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect o...
Tag this Judgment!Banwari Lal Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
$~82 (Category II) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3694/2014 & CM No.7474/2014 BANWARI LAL SHARMA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr P.S. Bindra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Siddharth Panda, Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Anshuman Nayak, Advocates for L&B/LAC Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this matter is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Girish Chhabra vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.: W.P.(C) 2759/2011 decided on 12.09.2014. He states that although possession of the subject land has been taken, the award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) was made more than five...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Kumar Aggarwal and ors Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
$~83(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3712/2014 & CM75242014 SATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS .... Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sandeep Bajaj For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for the Respondent/L&B and LAC. Mr Ajay Verma for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No....
Tag this Judgment!Arun Mehra Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
$~87 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 3836/2014 & CM No.7737/2014, 7738/2014 ARUN MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Nitin Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Siddharth Panda, Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Anshuman Nayak, Advocates for L&B/LAC Mr Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinaf...
Tag this Judgment!Consortium of Deepak Cable India Limited and Abir in Vs. Teesta Valley ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : September 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 15, 2014 FAO(OS) 397/2014 CONSORTIUM OF DEEPAK CABLE INDIA LIMITED & ABIR INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED (DCIL-AIPL) THR ABIR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayyar and Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocates instructed by Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Shaan Mohan and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates versus TEESTAVALLEY POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Mr.Amarjeet Singh Chandhiok and Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocates instructed by Ms.Haripriya Padmanabhan, Mr.Aman Garg, Mr.Vaibhav Jain, Mr.Abhimanyu Garg and Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Advocates FAO(OS) 398/2014 ABIR INFRASTRUCUTURE PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayyar and Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Shaan Mohan and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates versus TEESTAVALLEY POWER TRANSMISION LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.Abh...
Tag this Judgment!Sudhir @ Sudeep Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 15, 2014 + CRL.A. 876/2014 SUDHIR @ SUDEEP KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sumi Anand, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Lokinder Singh and SI Sahdev Singh, PS Jaitpur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10119/2014 1. On the last date of hearing we had intimated to learned counsel for the parties that if for some reason arguments would not be heard in the appeal, Crl.M.B.No.10119/2014 shall be heard today.2. Since the appeal is being heard today itself the application seeking suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal is dismissed. Crl.A.No.876/2014 1. Sudhir the appellant has been convicted for the offence of having murdered his wife Ruby. The learned Trial Judge, vide decision dated January 30, 2014, has heavily relied upon the tes...
Tag this Judgment!