Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 4 of about 257 results (0.021 seconds)Prakash Chand and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 1457/2014 & CM30343035/2014 ... Petitioners PRAKASH CHAND & ANR versus Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent GNCTD For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent R-6/7 : Mr N.S.Vasisht, Mr Vishal Singh, Ms Jyoti Kataria, Ms Madhur Bhargava. : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, : Mr Ajay Verma : Mr Anshuj Dhingra CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The case of the petitioners is admittedly covered by the decision of this court in Om Prakash & Ors. v. Lt. Governor cum Administrator & Ors .: WPC30662013...
Tag this Judgment!Saleem Qureshi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 26, 2014 + CRL.A. 1247/2012 SALEEM QURESHI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant is the father of baby Z. He was charged for having raped his daughter baby Z. He has been convicted vide impugned decision dated March 18, 2011. Vide order on sentence dated April 05, 2011, he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.2. The FSL report Ex.PW-15/A records the opinion of the Forensic Science Laboratory, to which the clothes of baby Z and vaginal swab of baby Z were sent that semen could not be detected either on the clothes of baby Z or in the vaginal swab.3. Therefrom an argument has been advanced that at best it is a case of digital rape.4. Counsel highlights that the offence took place on April ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramphal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 1421/2014 & CM29532014 ... Petitioners RAMPHAL & ORS. versus Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent L&B For the Respondent GNCTD For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent : Mr N.S.Vasisht, Mr Vishal Singh, Ms Jyoti Kataria, Ms Madhur Bhargava. : Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, : Mr Ajay Verma : Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The case of the petitioners is admittedly covered by the decision of this cour...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2014 + CRL.A. 664/1999 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocate Amicus Curiae and Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 By this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1873 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.PC) the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order on sentence dated 16.11.1999 and 17.11.1999 respectively passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi, thereby convicting the appellant for committing an offence under Section 302 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and also be liable to fine of Rs. 2000/- and in Crl A:664. 1999 Page 1 default ...
Tag this Judgment!Baljeet Singh and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: September 26.09.2014 + CRL.A. 386/2011 BALJEET SINGH & ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B. Badrinath, Advocate versus STATE Through + CRL.A. 486/2011 NIRMALA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State with Insp./SHO Raj Kumar & SI/IO Pradeep Kumar, PS Nangloi ..... Appellant Mr.N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Varun Deswal, Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State with Insp./SHO Raj Kumar & SI/IO Pradeep Kumar, PS Nangloi Mr. Ashok Drall, Advocate for Complainant + CRL.A. 487/2011 RAJESH & ANR. Through versus STATE OF DELHI Through + CRL.A. 1080/2011 PUSHPA DEVI Through ..... Appellants Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State with Insp./SHO Raj Kumar & SI/IO Pradeep Kumar, PS Nangloi Mr. Ashok Drall, Advocate for Complainant ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Drall...
Tag this Judgment!CaptaIn Bindu Sethi Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: September 26th , 2014 + W.P.(C) 4840/2010 CAPTAIN BINDU SETHI Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Ms. Garima Sachdeva & Ms Shruti Munjal, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in person versus UOI AND ORS Through + CONT.CAS(C) 475/2012 CAPTAIN BINDU SETHI Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Central Government Standing Counsel alongwith Sh. Atul Saini & Sh. S.M. Dewedi, DCs BSF ..... Petitioner Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Ms. Garima Sachdeva & Ms Shruti Munjal, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in person versus RK SINGH SECRETARY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Central Government Standing Counsel alongwith Sh. Atul Saini & Sh. S.M. Dewedi, DCs BSF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, Captain Bindu Sethi, invoking the writ juris...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-xi Vs. Rama Krishna Jewellers
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h August, 2014 Date of decision:26. h September, 2014 + INCOME TAX APPEAL4552014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus RAMA KRISHNA JEWELLERS ..... Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL4562014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus RAMA KRISHNA JEWELLERS ..... Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL4572014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus RAMA KRISHNA JEWELLERS ..... Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL4582014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI ITA Nos. 455- 460 of 2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 20 Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counse...
Tag this Judgment!Oracle India Pvt Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 13896/2009 and CM No.15790/2009 ... Petitioner ORACLE INDIA PVT LTD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr Mayank Nagi, Mr Harkunal Singh, Mr Tarandeep Singh and Mr Tarun Singh For the Respondents : Ms Prem Lata Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mr Naman Nayak. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The notice dated 30.03.2009 under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and the order dated 23.11.2009 rejecting the objections filed by the assessee are the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition which pertains to the assessment year 2002-03.2. The assessment under Section 143(3) was completed and the assessment order was passed on 04.03.2005. The notice under S...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Talwar and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4359/2014 RAKESH KUMAR TALWAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Pramod Kumar, PS Bhajan Pura. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.14979/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4359/2014 This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.452/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Bhajanpura on 6th December, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr.Sanjeev Kum...
Tag this Judgment!Dr John Mukhopadhyay Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 4324/1994 DR JOHN MUKHOPADHYAY ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Manish Kumar, Mr Piyush Kaushik and Ms Nalini Singh, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate for R-1 & R-3 Mr Arun Birbal, Mr Sanjau Singh and Mr Amit Tiwari, Advocate for R-2/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Although this writ petition was filed way back in 1994 and the acquisition was challenged on the ground that the objections under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were heard by one authority and decided by another, the situation has completely altered in view of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 A...
Tag this Judgment!