Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8713 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8714 of 2011 VICNIVAAS AGENCY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus MMTC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. + WP(C) No.8715 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8716 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINE...
The Associated Cement Cos. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.5597 of 2002 THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COS. LTD. & ANR...... Petitioners Through: Ms. Mrinal Mazumdar, Adv. For Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. for the Petitioners. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Prasook Jain, Adv. for Mr. B.V. Niren, CGSC for the Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) In exercise of the powers conferred by the Jute Packaging Materials (Compulsory use in packing commodities) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, vide order dated 15.3.1995, inter alia directed that 50 per cent of total production of cement will be in jute packaging material. The petitioner before this Court being manufacturer of cement, the aforesaid order applied to it.2. Vide show cause notice dated 11.12.1996 issued to various cement manufacturers, the Jute Commissioner, noticing that they had not been using any jute material at...
Awadesh Kumar Prajapati Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.1598/2013 AWADESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr Yash Tandon, Adv. with petitioner in person. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: .Respondent Mr Aditya Madan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The matter was re- notified for 15.11.2013 but the same being declared holiday on account of Muharram, vide Notification No.940/G-4/Genl.DHC dated 13.11.2013, has been taken up for hearing today. The petitioner before this Court claims to be 100% visually impaired. This is also his case that his wife is 60% handicapped. The petitioner is in the employment of Government of NCT of Delhi and, therefore, is eligible for allotment of a Government accommodation. Flat No.C-717, Type-III (First Floor) in Timarpur, Delhi, was allotted to the petitioner on 21.05.2012. The petitioner is posted at Police Lines, GTB Nagar and is seeking change of accommodation from Timarpur to ...
Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Mmtc Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8713 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8714 of 2011 VICNIVAAS AGENCY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus MMTC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. + WP(C) No.8715 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8716 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINE...
M/S Indu Projects Ltd Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2013 FAO(OS) 529/2013 M/S INDU PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA + ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 530/2013 M/S INDU PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA + ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 531/2013 M/S INDU PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA + ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 532/2013 M/S INDU PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Dushyant Dave and Mr Ashok Bhan, Senior Advocates with Mr Ashish Bhan and Mrs Genny Jetley Rautray For the Respondent : Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sumeet Pushkarna, Mr Jaswinder Singh and Ms Sana Sundaram CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 18349-52/2013 The exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 529/2013, 530/2013, 531/2013 & 532/2013 1. These appeals have been preferred...
M/S Hansa Electricals and ors. Vs. D.N.Wadhwa (Deceased) Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2013. + RFA1492005 M/S HANSA ELECTRICALS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Alok Mahajan and Mr. Rajesh Arya, Advocates. Versus D.N.WADHWA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 30th November, 2004 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi in Suit No.194/2003 filed by the deceased respondent/plaintiff) for recovery of Rs.8,40,000/- jointly and severally from the three appellants/defendants together with costs and interest pendente lite and future @ 10% per annum.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and subject to the appellants/defendants depositing the entire decretal amount in this Court, execution was stayed. In compliance therewith, a sum of Rs.8,40,000/- only was deposited and no amount of interest pendente lite and till the date of de...
Kamlesh Kumar @ K.K. Vs. the State (Government of N.C.T. of Dlehi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 232/2003 KAMLESH KUMAR @ K.K. Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Vidyarthi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DLEHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sha...
Tayyab Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on : November 21, 2013 + CRL.A. 1061/2010 TAYYAB ..... Appellant Through Mr.G.S.Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, Additional Public for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 28.07.2010 and 03.08.2010, respectively, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, has convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under Sections 302/323/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life together with imposition of fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to undergo further simple...
Jai Karan Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 7621/2005 JAI KARAN ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + Through:Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7627/2005 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + ..... Respondents ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7635/2005 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus NCVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) WP(C) No.1353/2012 was filed by Kavinder Kaushik and two others, seeking removal of certain alleged unauthorized occupants from the premises of Nehru Memori...
Commissioner of Income Tax: Delhi-viii Vs. Ashok Mittal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
$~03 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2013 + INCOME TAX APPEAL272013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX: DELHI-VIII...Appellant Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Standing Counsel. versus ASHOK MITTAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Damini Chawla, Ms. Radhika Arora and Mr. Harsh Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) relates to assessment year 2000-01. By order dated 8th April, 2013, notice limited to the question of addition of Rs.31.5 lacs was issued. The contention of the Revenue is that the respondent-assessee had earned income of Rs.31.5 lacs as Investment Manager from Fareast Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and M/s European Investment Ltd. but this income should be taxed under the head income from other sources. Tribunal, it is submitted has erred in holding it as business incom...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »