Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Sushil Ansal Vs. Shri Charanjit Singh Sole Proprietor, Charmis Ent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: November 22, 2013 + CM(M) 952/2013 & C.M. No.14389/2013 SH SUSHIL ANSAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Awatar Singh, Adv. with Mr.Gurinder Pal Singh, Adv. versus SHRI CHARANJIT SINGH SOLE PROPRIETOR, CHARMIS ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 26th August, 2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge in Civil Suit No.227/2013.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present matter are that the petitioner filed a suit against the respondent for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent as also damages for illegal use and occupation of the suit premises i.e. Mezzanine Floor, Sandhya Deep Building, 15, Community Centre, East of Kailash, New Delhi. It was stated in the suit that the respondent was under a tenancy of the petitioner at a mo...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nr Portfolio Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1018/2011 Reserved on:14. h August, 2013 Date of Decision :22. d November, 2013 % COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus NR PORTFOLIO PVT LTD. Through + ..... Respondent Dr. Rakesh Gupta and Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1019/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus NR PORTFOLIO PVT LTD. Through ..... Respondent Dr. Rakesh Gupta and Mr. RishabhKapoor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.These two appeals by the Revenue relate to a common assessee i.e., N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. and the questions raised relating to assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are similar. They pertain to the additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) of Rs.1,2,34,100/-...
Sh. Harish Kumar Sharma Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7328/2013 22nd November, 2013 % SH. HARISH KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avanish Kumar, Advocate. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition impugns the order dated 5/10.4.2013 dismissing the second representation of the petitioner for reconsideration of his pre-mature retirement vide order dated 14.2.2006.2. The impugned order dated 5/10.4.2013 notes two important points. First is that there is no provision for second representation/review in case of pre-mature retirement. Second is that there are as many as 22 charges against the petitioner (12 major and 10 minor) and which talk of grave fraud and huge loss to the respondent no.1 on account of petitioner wrongly purchasing food grains which were not as per standards.3. Since the order date...
Mukesh Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Date of Decision: % + 29th October, 2013 22nd November, 2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.89/2013 RANBIR @ PAPPU & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr.Dushyant Yadav, Mr.Tarunesh Kumar and Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1430/2012 MUKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Bhardwaj, Mr.Narender Kumar & Ms.Naina, Advocates. versus STATE Through: CRL.A. Nos.89/2013, 1430/2012 & 185/2013 ..... Respondent + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.185/2013 DAULAT RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sushil Bajaj & Mr.Aditya Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. The present appeals have been preferred by Ranbir @ Pappu, Ravi @ Ashu, Mukesh Kumar and Daulat Ram against the judgment dated 30th August, 2012 pas...
Toni and Guy Products Ltd and anr Vs. Shyam Sunder Nagpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA Nos.16394/2012 (O.VII R.11 CPC), 17475/2012 (O.VII R.10 CPC), 17476/2012 (O.35 R.1 CPC) & 13393/2012 (O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC) in CS(OS) No.2224/2012 % Reserved on:10. h September, 2013 Decided on:22. d November, 2013 TONI & GUY PRODUCTS LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate. versus SHYAM SUNDER NAGPAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani and Mr. Arun Jain, Advocates. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Before adverting to these individual applications it would be appropriate to set the facts which would be common to all the applications and then decide the same in the seriatim noted above.2. As per the plaint, plaintiff No.1 is a private limited company incorporated under the laws of England engaged in manufacturing and marketing of hair care products under the mark TONI & GUY. The plaintiff No.2 is also a private limited company incorporated under the laws of England and...
Smt. Ramwati and ors. Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
$~32 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d November, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7310/2013 DAL CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Panwar, Adv. with Mr. Sunil Dutt Baloni, Adv. versus + GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for R-1, R-3 & R-4. Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Adv. for R-2. W.P.(C) 7311/2013 SMT. RAMWATI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.S. Panwar, Adv. with Mr. Sunil Dutt Baloni, Adv. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for R-1, R-3 & R-4. Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL ORDER2211.2013 CM APPL.15724/2013 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 7310/2013 CM APPL.15727/2013 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 7311/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7310/2013 and CM APPL.15725/2013 (stay) 1. By virtue of this writ petition, the Petitioner...
S.T.G. International Ltd. and ors Vs. Rajesh Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h November, 2013 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2803/2012 S.T.G. INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: + CRL.M.C. 2804/2012 S.T.G. INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate CRL.M.C. 2805/2012 S.T.G. INTERTIONAL LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of these three petitions under Section 482 of the Code o...
Director of Income Tax Vs. Infrasoft Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :3. rd July, 2013 Judgment pronounced on:22nd November, 2013 % + ITA10342009 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate. versus INFRASOFT LTD. ..... Respondent Mr. Ajay Vohra with Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) filed by the Revenue impugning order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ITAT) 2. Vide order dated 20.10.2009, the following ======================================================================= substantial questions of law were framed:1) Whether the learned ITAT erred in holding that nature of receipts amounting to Rs. 2,74,00,630/- was business income and not royalty income wherein the meaning of Section 9(1)(vi) read (SI...
Aruna Chadha Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.305/2013 ARUNA CHADHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. U.U. Lalit, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meghna Sankhla, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Siddharth Luthra, ASG with Mr. Promod K. Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC, Mr. Aditya Singla, Advocate, Mr. Shiv Panda, Advocate & Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocate Inspector Dinesh Kumar, IO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ORDER2211.2013 CRL.M.A.14966/2013 & 14965/2013) in CRL.REV.P.305/2013 1. By virtue of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, the Petitioner Aruna Chadha(AC) seeks clarification of the order dated 25.07.2013 passed by this Court and setting aside of the order dated 14.08.2013 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge (D&SJ), Rohini in SC No.02/13 titled State v. Gopal Goyal Kanda & Ors. and the order dated 17.08.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Fast Track Court for sexual offenc...
S.T.G. Intertional Ltd and ors Vs. Rajesh Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h November, 2013 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2803/2012 S.T.G. INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: + CRL.M.C. 2804/2012 S.T.G. INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate CRL.M.C. 2805/2012 S.T.G. INTERTIONAL LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate versus RAJESH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of these three petitions under Section 482 of the Code o...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »