Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.K. Granites Vs. Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limite
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8713 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8714 of 2011 VICNIVAAS AGENCY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus MMTC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. + WP(C) No.8715 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8716 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINE...
Vishal Kapoor Vs. Yashna Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2013 Decided on:21. 11.2013 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 24/2013, C.M. NO.12007/2013 & 12008/2013 VISHAL KAPOOR ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Manish Tandon, Advocate. versus YASHNA KAPOOR ..... Respondent Through: Sh. S.K. Puri, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gaurav Puri, Ms. Gayatri Puri and Ms. Kalpana Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % C.M. No.12008/2013 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. No.12008/2013 is allowed. MAT. APP. (F.C.) 24/2013, C.M. No.12007/2013 (for stay) 1. In this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, the husband challenges an order of the Family Court directing him to pay maintenance pendente lite to the wife, Yashna Kapoor (hereafter the wife) during the course of divorce proceedings.2. The facts are that the husband preferred a petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Mar...
Raj Kumar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present app...
Sher Singh Vs. the State (Delhi Administration)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present app...
Vinod Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 7621/2005 JAI KARAN ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + Through:Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7627/2005 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + ..... Respondents ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7635/2005 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus NCVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) WP(C) No.1353/2012 was filed by Kavinder Kaushik and two others, seeking removal of certain alleged unauthorized occupants from the premises of Nehru Memori...
Uoi Vs. Rakesh Mehrotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 1590/2012 UOI ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.Saqib with Mr.Akshay Chandra and Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advocates versus RAKESH MEHROTRA Through: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent before this Court vide application dated 30.3.2011 sought the following information from the Central Public Information Officer(CPIO) in Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT):1.2. 3.4. 5.6.7. for Pl link earlier file also dated 26/5/2010 DFA submitted dated 26/5/2010 Copy of the note may be added to the file dated 9/6/2010 and needful done 10/6/2010 Previous file on the subject not traceable. However a copy of the note approved by ---- at pp60.70 K attached and draft ACC note submitted dated 11/6/2010 Pl fair note dated 20/6/2010 Fair DO submitted on 23/11/2010 File submitted wrt direction of PMO at p.17/N(para2 ---) 8.9. 10.11. 12.13. 14.15. 16.17. 18.19. 20.21. 22...
Sudesh Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present app...
Hotline Electronics Ltd. and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 129/2013 and Crl. M.A. 489/2013 HOTLINE ELECTRONICS LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Bughani, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Pramod Saxena, APP for the State. Mr. Vinod Pant, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17th March, 2012 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (for short MM) (although, wrongly mentioned as Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in the petition), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in C.C. No.4819/2009 titled as M/s PVR Infotech v. Hotline Electronics Limited and Another as also order dated 1st November, 2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (for short ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the revision pe...
Mohd. Kalam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 6/2006 Judgment dated 21st November, 2013 % MOHD. KALAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Shishir Kumar and Mr.Shoeb Shakeel, Advs. along with appellant. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.09.2005 and order on sentence dated 13.10.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellant has been directed to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 years with a fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC and in default of payment of fine, further imprisonment for two months. The appellant has further been directed to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further imprisonment for a period of two months. For the offence...
Shri Virender Kumar Garg Vs. Shri Ravinder Kumar Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 10.2013 Decided on:21. 11.2013 + RFA (OS) 133/2013, C.M. No.16935/2013 & 16936/2013 SHRI VIRENDER KUMAR GARG ..... Appellant Through: Sh. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. versus SHRI RAVINDER KUMAR GARG Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % C.M. No.16935/2013 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RFA (OS) 133/2013, C.M. No.16936/2013 (for stay) 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 29.08.2013 by the learned Single Judge dismissing the appellants suit.2. The appellant/plaintiff had sought declaration, partition, mandatory injunction and cancellation of documents. The plaintiff and the first four defendants are the sons of late Mr. J.N. Garg. The RFA(OS)133/2013 Page 1 fifth defendant is their mother and sixth defendant, the wife of the first defendant.3. The Plaintiff had contended that the late Mr. Ghamand...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »