Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sarfraj Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present app...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Associate Techno Plastics P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.20/2000 Reserved on:1. t August, 2013 Date of decision:21. t November, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S ASSOCIATE TECHNO PLASTICS P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Nemo. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.95/2002 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S HCL EMPLOYEES & INVEST. CO.LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha & Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarn, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Appeal by the Revenue being ITA No.95/2002, which pertains to Assessment Year 1989-90, was admitted vide order dated 8th July, 2005 for determination of the following substantial question of law:Whether ITAT was correct in deleting the addition of Rs.2,39,86,572/- being the difference between the sale price declared by the assessee and the market price of ...
R.P.Dhiman Vs. D V B and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.2608/2000 21st November, 2013 R.P.DHIMAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K.Saini, Advocate. Versus D V B AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikram Nandrajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition petitioner impugns the orders passed by the departmental authorities; disciplinary authority dated 16.4.1998, appellate authority dated 7.10.1998 and reviewing authority dated 12.8.1999; imposing a penalty of reduction of one increment without cumulative effect.2. The charge against the petitioner was that though he was in overall control of the sub-station in front of A-118, Phase-II, Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Delhi, he however failed to detect theft of electricity from the LT Panel in the sub-station and failed to report the same.3. A show cause notice dated 9.2.1995 was served upon the petitioner, and ...
Amarjit Singh Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.10968/2009 21st November, 2013 % AMARJIT SINGH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Ranjan K. Chaurasia, Advocate. VERSUS PUNJAB & SIND BANK Through: ...... Respondent Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This case is listed today as 15.11.2013 was declared a holiday.2. By this writ petition, petitioner impugns the departmental proceedings commenced against him pursuant to the charge-sheet dated 15.7.2009. Petitioner pleads and contends that since the charge-sheet dated 15.7.2009 was being issued much after the petitioner took voluntary retirement on 24.7.2008, no departmental proceedings can be initiated after his voluntary retirement in terms of the impugned charge-sheet. It is also contended and pleaded that merely because a show cause notice was issued on 14.7.2008 cannot mean that departmental proceedings have been initiated prior...
Udaibir Singh @ Tinku Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
$~ 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1575/2011 % Judgment dated 21.11.2013 UDAIBIR SINGH @ TINKU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State along with S.I. Nitin, P.S. Gokulpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 17162/2013 1. By the present application, appellant prays for issuance of production warrants with respect to the appellant.2. Dismissed as infructuous. CRL.A. 1575/2011 & CRL.M.A. 4510/2013 3. The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment dated 5.5.2011 and the order on sentence dated 13.5.2011 by which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.7,000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer R.I. for one year.4. During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant made an application [Crl.M.A.No.4510/2013]. under Section 7 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of...
Jishan Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:20. h NOVEMBER, 2013 BAIL APPLN. 1035/2013 JISHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Bhalla, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP Mr. S. Rajan, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2/complainant in person ASI Rajbir Singh, PS Nangloi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is an application filed by the petitioner u/s 438 Cr. P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.141/2013 lodged by Ms. Shama u/s 354A/452/506/323/34 IPC at PS Nangloi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the complainant and her family are next door neighbours of the petitioner, who is residing in Camp No.1, Nangloi, Delhi. The incident in question is stated to have occurred on 6th May, 2013 when an altercation had taken place between the family members of the complainant and the petitioner in respect of a petty dispute resulting in lodging of the a...
Kailash Chand Bansal Vs. Punjabi Bagh Club and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on: + 01.10.2013 20.11.2013 IA No.11525/2012(u/O39R1&2) in CS(OS) 1848/2012 KAILASH CHAND BANSAL ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Siddharth Bambha and Mr.Shyam D. Nandan, Advocate versus PUNJABI BAGH CLUB & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate for D-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.11525/2012(u/O39R1&2) 1. The present Suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree declaring Enquiry Report dated 15.01.2012 and the consequent expulsion letter dated 21.5.2012 suspending the plaintiffs primary membership of the defendant No.1 to be null and void. Alongwith the Suit the present application is filed seeking stay of the operation of letter dated 21.5.2012.2. The brief facts as narrated in the plaint are that the plaintiff is stated to be a member of defendant No.1 Club. Defendant No.1 Club is registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860. Defendants No.2 and 3 are the ...
Moongipa Securities Limited Vs. Assistant Commisioner of Income Tax an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Writ Petition (Civil) No.6531/1998 Reserved on:3. d October, 2013 Date of Decision:20. h November, 2013 % MOONGIPA SECURITIES LIMITED Through ....Petitioner Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX & WEALTH TAX Respondent Through Mr. Anmol Sinha, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Impugned notices/ communications/penalty orders passed by Assistant Income Tax Commissioner, Circle 7(4), New Delhi, direct Moongipa Securities Ltd, the petitioner to pay liabilities and dues of S.C. Mangal, (respondent No.3, herein) under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act, for short) and Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (WT Act, for short). The petitioner disputes their liability to pay dues of the third respondent. The said respondent has not entered appearance and as per the facts pleaded, has migrated to United States of America.2. The details of the dues claimed ...
Dr. (Mrs.) Pramila Srivastava Vs. Smt. Asha Srivastava and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. 11.2013 Decided on :20. 11.2013 + IA No.11837/2013(u/S24r/w S151CPC) in CS(OS) 491/2008 DR. (MRS.) PRAMILA SRIVASTAVA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Ms. Vaishali Kakra and Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Advocates versus SMT. ASHA SRIVASTAVA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Sandeep P. Agarwal, Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath and Mr. Nitesh K. Sharma, Advocates for D1,2,3&5 with D2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.11837/2013(u/S24r/w S151 CPC) 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking consolidation of the present suit with the Testamentary Case No.89/2008 titled as Gautam Srivastava vs. State and Others. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the parties to the present suit are also the parties to the aforesaid probate proceedings. Defendant No.2 has relied upon Will dated 26.04.2005 alleged to have been executed by Late Sh.R.P.Srivastava. H...
Raj Rani Verma Vs. Brahm Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. h November, 2013 + MAC.APP. 1118/2012 RAJ RANI VERMA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Peeush Sharma, Advocate. Versus BRAHM SINGH AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.3/ Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 01.03.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation of Rs.4,41,358/- with interest at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. The appellant met with an accident occurred on 18.10.2008 and remained admitted in DDU hospital till 27.10.2008. Thereafter, she was referred to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and remained admitted there till 19.11.2008. She was further referred to the Central ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »