Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sonny Sarna and anr. Vs. Urmil Wadhwa and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 1642 of 2012 Reserved on: October 31, 2013 Decision on: November 21, 2013 SONNY SARNA & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Dua, Advocate versus URMIL WADHAWAN & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhay Singh & Ms. Yasmin Zafar, Advocates for Defendants 1 and 2 Mr. Siddharth Khattar, Advocate for Defendant No.6 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2111.2013 IA No.16375 of 2013 (Order XII Rule 6 CPC) 1. This is an application by the Plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for a decree on admissions.2. Plaintiff No.1, Mr. Sonny Sarna and his father, Lt. Col. (Retd.) H.S. Sarna, Plaintiff No.2 have filed the above suit against Mrs. Urmil Wadhawan, Defendant No.1, her son Mr. Anuj Wadhawan, Defendant No.2 and Defendants 3 to 19 (impleaded as proforma Defendants) for recovery of possession of the specified portions of the first and second floor (besides one g...
Apoorva Agencies Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8713 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8714 of 2011 VICNIVAAS AGENCY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus MMTC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. + WP(C) No.8715 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. + WP(C) No.8716 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Sureshan, Adv. Versus TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINE...
Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 7621/2005 JAI KARAN ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + Through:Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7627/2005 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + ..... Respondents ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) 7635/2005 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.N.Gupta with Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates versus NCVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Prabhat Kumar with Ms.Prerna Kumari and Ms.Poonam Kumari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) WP(C) No.1353/2012 was filed by Kavinder Kaushik and two others, seeking removal of certain alleged unauthorized occupants from the premises of Nehru Memori...
Davinder Singh Prop. Modern Engeneering Co. Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.2309 of 2008 DAVINDER SINGH PROP. MODERN ENGENEERING CO. ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for the Petitioner with Petitioner in person. Versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Renuka Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court is carrying on business in a nonconforming area at NZ-42, New Vishnu Garden, Khayala, New Delhi. On 3.10.1996, the petitioner applied for allotment of an industrial plot under the relocation scheme of the respondents vide application number 2261 and deposited a sum of Rs.60,000/- (sixty thousand only) as earnest money. Vide letter dated 22.3.2000, the respondents informed the petitioner that though the Government had, through advertisement published in newspaper in July, 1999 and September, 1999, given an opportunity to all the applicants to file an appeal after ascertaining the status of their...
Union of India Vs. Dr. H.C. Sharatchandra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.5827 of 2013 &CM.12828 of 2013 (stay) UNION OF INDIA Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Saqib and Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advs. Versus DR. H.C. SHARATCHANDRA Through: None ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent before this Court vide his application dated 31.1.2011 sought the following information from the CPIO of the Prime Ministers Office):1. Date(s) of the meeting Honble Prime Minister attended meeting of Appointment Committee of Cabinet (ACC) held to consider approval/ disapproval of candidates selected as Expert Members to National Green Tribunal with names of other ACC members who attended such meeting(s). Information refers to papers sent by MOEF vide their note OM No.17(11)2011-PL-NGT dated 31.03.2011 and or any subsequent communication on the same subject.2. If the decision was taken by circulation of files, then the details of file movement date on ...
Tejavathu Chandu Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5448/2011 21st November, 2013 % TEJAVATHU CHANDU Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Apurb Lal, Advocate. VERSUS FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This case is listed today as 15.11.2013 was declared a holiday.2. By this writ petition, petitioner who is put at serial No.1 in the waiting list for the post of Assistant General Manager (Accounts) seeks direction for cancellation of the appointment of respondent no.2 who was placed at serial no.2 in the select list. Both the petitioner and respondent no.2 are aspirants to the two posts of AGM (Accounts) in the ST Category. If the respondent no.2s name is cancelled as appearing at serial no.2 in the select list, then petitioner who is at serial no.1 in the wait list would accordingly get the appointment.3. The only issu...
Dr. Anup Kumar Srivastava Vs. State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.4360/2012 DR. ANUP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K. Rungta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pratiti Rungta, Mr. Sumit Pargal and Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocates versus STATE THR. CBI Through: ....Respondent Ms. Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocate and Mr. R.L. Yadav, Investigating Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. ORDER2111.2013 Vide impugned order of 8th November, 2012 petitioner alongwith his co-accused has been charged for committing offences under Section 120-B of IPC read with Sections 7, 12 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. Petitioner was Commissioner (Excise), Delhi who had purportedly conspired with his co-accused-Lallan [Superintendent (Central Excise), New Delhi]. and one Hemant Gandhi in getting illegal raid conducted on 28th December, 2011 at the premises of co-accused-Dalip Aggarwal and Anand Aggarwal to obtain...
Manpreet Singh Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: November21, 2013 + CRL.M.C.3441/2010 & Crl.M.A. 16999/2010 MANPREET SINGH Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia and Mr. Prashant Ghai, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State with SI Sahi Ram, PS Greater Kailash-I CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGEMENT At the stage of recording of evidence in FIR No.477/1996 under Sections 51, 63, 68A of The Copyright Act, 1957 registered at Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi on 24th November, 1996, petitioner-accused had filed an application under Section 468 of Cr.P.C. for dropping of proceedings arising out of this FIR by raising plea of limitation. Above-said application of petitioner stands rejected by trial court vide impugned order of 16th July, 2010 while observing that at the stage of hearing on the charge, issue of delay in taking cognizance ...
M/S. Bhandari Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. New India Mosaic and Marble Co. P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 11.2013 Decided on:21. 11.2013 + EFA (OS) 12/2013, C.M. No.8983/2013 M/S. BHANDARI BUILDERS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Sh. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate. versus NEW INDIA MOSAIC AND MARBLE CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Trideep Pais, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The unsuccessful judgment debtor claims to be aggrieved by an order of 08.03.2013 by the learned Single Judge made in E.P. 188/2005.2. The facts are that the respondent (hereafter referred to as the decree holder) succeeded in arbitration proceedings. An award was made on 29.07.1991 in its favour and against the judgment debtor/appellant. In terms of the award, the decree holder was entitled to an amount of `7,90,000/- with interest @ 12% per annum with costs of ` 1,00,000/- and `50,000/- towards cost of the machinery. The judgment debtor objected to the award in proc...
Dr. (Mrs.) Anita Mehrotra Vs. Miranda House and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4519/2008 21st November, 2013 % DR. (MRS.) ANITA MEHROTRA Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Advocate for petitioner No.1. Versus MIRANDA HOUSE AND ORS. Through: Respondents Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Ms. Beenashaw Soni, Advocate and Mr. Aakash Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 4 and 5. Mr. Amit Khemka, Advocate with Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. I may note that there were two petitioners in this writ petition. Petitioner no.2 had withdrawn her petition and the case is now being argued only by petitioner no.1 for the reliefs claimed in the writ petition.2. Petitioners were appointed as ad hoc Lecturers with the respondent no.1/Miranda House. Petitioners participated in the selection process for appointment to permanent posts as per the advertisement dated 29.5.2007. Pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »