Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Kamini and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. h November, 2013 MAC.APP. 269/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented By: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus KAMINI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented By: Ms. Monika, Adv. for Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R1 to R6. Mr. Dinesh Kothari and Mr. B.S. Randhava, Advs. for R7 and R9. Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv. for Mr. Rakesh Khatana, Adv. for R8 & R10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) + MAC.APP. 269/2011 1. Present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 19.01.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.5,82,556/- along with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of realization.2. Vide this appeal, appellant is seeking exoneration from any liability and alternatively seeking recovery right against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.3. On this issue, ld. Tribunal has recorded in the...
Jasbir Singh Vs. Manjit Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 20, 2013 CM(M) No.1041/2011, CM Nos.16799/2011 & 16800/2011 JASBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.R.S. Sharma, Adv. versus MANJIT KAUR & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr.M.L. Bajaj, Adv. RC.REV. 179/2013 & CM No.7332/2013 JASBIR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.R.S. Sharma, Adv. versus CHARAN KAUR AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.L. Bajaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of the petition, being CM(M) No.1041/2011, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has assailed orders dated 19 th May, 2011 and 26th August, 2010, where the order passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the order, i.e. the eviction order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 26 th August, 2010 in respect of a shop in the property bearing No.XVII/2568, Gali Mandir Wali, Shadi Khampur, New Delhi (hereinafte...
M/S Shiva Rice Mills Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 11.2013 O.M.P. 204/2012 M/S SHIVA RICE MILLS ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anisha Upadhyay and Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Advocates Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate + O.M.P. 796/2011 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate Versus M/S SHIVA RICE MILLS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anisha Upadhyay and Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.1320/2013 (u/O6R17r/w Section 151 CPC for amendment of the petition) in OMP2042012 1. This is an application filed for seeking amendment in the petition.2. Notice in this application was issued on 29.1.2013. Thereafter, the non-applicant/ Food Corporation of India (in short FCI) has appeared on several dates but, admittedly, no reply has been filed.3. ...
Food Corporation of India Vs. M/S Shiva Rice Mills and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 11.2013 O.M.P. 204/2012 M/S SHIVA RICE MILLS ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anisha Upadhyay and Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Advocates Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate + O.M.P. 796/2011 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate Versus M/S SHIVA RICE MILLS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anisha Upadhyay and Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.1320/2013 (u/O6R17r/w Section 151 CPC for amendment of the petition) in OMP2042012 1. This is an application filed for seeking amendment in the petition.2. Notice in this application was issued on 29.1.2013. Thereafter, the non-applicant/ Food Corporation of India (in short FCI) has appeared on several dates but, admittedly, no reply has been filed.3. ...
Simon Jason Sehmbey Vs. Ruchi Rai
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~1&2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:20. 11.2013 FAO682013, C.M. APPL.2452/2013 & 11574/2013 RUCHI RAI SEHMBEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with Mr. Ashwarth Sitaraman and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates. versus SIMON JASON SEHMBEY @ HAMINDER SEHMBEY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia with Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 22/2013, C.M. APPL.11525/2013, 11527/2013 & 15924/2013 SIMON JASON SEHMBEY ..... Appellant Through: Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia with Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. versus RUCHI RAI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with Mr. Ashwarth Sitaraman and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The present common judgment will dispose of two appeals - one preferred by the wife (FAO682013) and the other by husband (MAT. APP. (FC) 22/2013).2. By the impugned order, the Family Court directed the payment ...
Ruchi Rai Sehmbey Vs. Simon Jason Sehmbey @ Haminder Sehmbey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~1&2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:20. 11.2013 FAO682013, C.M. APPL.2452/2013 & 11574/2013 RUCHI RAI SEHMBEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with Mr. Ashwarth Sitaraman and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates. versus SIMON JASON SEHMBEY @ HAMINDER SEHMBEY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia with Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 22/2013, C.M. APPL.11525/2013, 11527/2013 & 15924/2013 SIMON JASON SEHMBEY ..... Appellant Through: Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia with Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. versus RUCHI RAI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with Mr. Ashwarth Sitaraman and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The present common judgment will dispose of two appeals - one preferred by the wife (FAO682013) and the other by husband (MAT. APP. (FC) 22/2013).2. By the impugned order, the Family Court directed the payment ...
Union of India Vs. Pramod Kumar Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:19. 11.2013 WP(C) No.14069 of 2009 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey & Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. Versus PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN Through: + ..... Respondent Nemo. WP(C) No.14084 of 2009 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey & Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. Versus RAJESH KUMAR TYAGI Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN ..... Respondent JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) Both the above-referred petitions involve interpretation of Section 8 (1) (i) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which reads as under:8. Exemption from disclosure of information. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen, . (i) cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers: Provided that the decisions of Council of Ministers, the reasons thereof, and the material on the basis of...
Bishan Dass Durga Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN.1036/2013 Reserved on :29. h October, 2013 Date of decision :19. h November, 2013 % BISHAN DASS DURGA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Anurag Jain, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Karan Singh, APP. Mr. Sanjay Suri, Adv. for complainant. S.I. Gopal, P.S. Shakar Pur, Delhi. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No.835/2012 under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.2. The petitioner is the father-in-law of Payal. On 12th November, 2012 at about 6:00 am, the petitioner found Payal hanging from the ceiling fan whereupon he immediately informed the complainant, Naresh Batra (father of Payal) who along with his wife, son and daughter reached the petitioners house. The deceased was taken to Shanti Mukund Hospital where she was declared dead. The complainant lodged the FIR in which he made allegations of harassment and demands ag...
Parvez Ahmed Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA8582013 & CM APPL. 18066/2013 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate with Mr.Sudipto Sircar, Mr. Annam Ventatesh and Mrs. Neelam Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2. Reserved on :18. h November, 2013 Date of Decision :19. h November, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present letters patent appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 30th October, 2013 whereby appellant-petitioners writ petition primarily seeking a direction to the respondent No.2-oil company to grant dealership of petrol pump being run by the appellant-petitioner at Kasenda, District Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh to appellant-petitioner or his nominee, was dismissed.2. Learned Single Judge while dismissing the appellants writ petition observed as under:9. The thrust of the case of the petitione...
M/S American Express Company and Others Vs. M/S Amex Financial Service ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 10.2013 % Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2013 + CS(OS) 1681/2011 & I.A No.10932/2011 M/S AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY & OTHERS Through: ..... Plaintiffs Ms. Ekta Sarin and Ms. Ankita Ubeja, Advocates versus M/S AMEX FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LTD & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This suit for grant of mandatory and permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademark, passing off and delivery up has been filed by plaintiff no 1 which is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York , United States of America, Plaintiff no 2 which is a group company of Plaintiff No.1 and is incorporated under the Companies Act,1956 and plaintiff no 3 which is also a group company of Plaintiff No 1, incorporated under the laws of state of Delaware, United States of America against Defendant No 1 Company incorporated under the Companies Act...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »