Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bijender Kr Gupta Vs. Corporation Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t October, 2013 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2132/2012 and CM APPL.4608/2012 (stay) BIJENDER KR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Atul Bandhu, Advocate versus CORPORATION BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajant Kumar Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Petitioner Bijender Kumar Gupta by virtue of this writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India prays for quashing of the orders dated 02.11.2011 and 01.03.2012 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) in Complaint Case No.2098/2/2011 whereby in pursuance of the application under Section 14(2) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), the Receiver was directed to take into possession the land measuring 16 Biswas out of Khasra No.59/17, situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Mundka, De...
Prof. Ram Bux Jat Vs. Jawahar Lal Nehru University and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.3377/2012 22nd November, 2013 PROF. RAM BUX JAT Through: ......Petitioner Mr. G.D.Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Sagari Dhanda, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, impugns the order dated 9.4.2012 passed by the respondent no.1-Jawahar Lal Nehru University, (JNU) reducing by re-fixing the pay of the petitioner w.e.f 1.10.1998. The pay of the petitioner w.e.f 1.10.1998 has been reduced by the amount of pension which the petitioner was drawing from his erstwhile employerrespondent no.2-Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU). The impugned order dated 9.4.2012 reads as under:- JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC BRANCH No.Acad.1/SL/1(361) APRIL092012 OFFICE ORDER No.672 Ref: Office Order No.2078 dated 26.10....
Sunil @ Shelly Etc. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
$~ R-24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 126/2005 Judgment dated 22nd November, 2013 % SUNIL @ SHELLY ETC. ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the judgment of the trial court dated 17.1.2005, whereby the appellants were convicted under section 308 read with section 34 IPC and order on sentence dated 19.1.2005 by which appellants were awarded sentence of one year with fine of Rs.500/- each, and in default of payment of fine RI for one month.2. As per the prosecution, on 28.5.2001 at about 10:30 pm a complaint was lodged by one Chander that appellants had beaten one Shri Krishan and his brother. On the basis of the complaint an FIR No.240/2001 under Sections 308/34 IPC was registered at P.S. Mukherjee Nagar, New Delhi. The case was committed for trial on 25.2....
Tushar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:20. 11.2013 Date of Decision:22. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6268/2013 & CM137142013 (Stay) TUSHAR SHARMA Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.C. Mittal and Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advs. ..... Respondents Mr. B.V. Niren, CGSC for R-1 UOI, Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court, in essence, is challenging the decision of the Government of India to allocate 39 out of 150 seats of the MBBS in Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) and Safdarjung Hospital to All India Region, over and above 23 seats to be filled through CBSE under the All India Quota. The petitioner belongs to OBC category and had appeared in the entrance test called NEET-UG2013 held for admission to various medical institutions. The petitioner, however, could not secure admission and his name was placed in the waiting list.2. VMMC was established by Gov...
a K Ganju Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d November, 2013 % + CRL.M.C. 2384/2011 & Crl. M.A. No.8693/2011 A K GANJU Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. Vishal Gohri, Advocates. Versus CBI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms. Sonia Mathur and Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3011/2011 NARESH SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Advocate. Versus CBI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms. Sonia Mathur and Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. 3800/2011 & Crl. M.A. No.18063/2011 R.S. GEHLOT Represented by: Crl.MC Nos.2384, 3011, 3800 of 2011 ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Senior with Mr. Karn Bhardwaj, Mr. Vineet Malhotra, Mr. K.S. Yadav and Mr. Vishal Malhotra, Advocates. Versus CBI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms. Sonia Mathur and Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petitions, the petitioners are seeking the...
Ranbir @ Pappu and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Date of Decision: % + 29th October, 2013 22nd November, 2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.89/2013 RANBIR @ PAPPU & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr.Dushyant Yadav, Mr.Tarunesh Kumar and Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1430/2012 MUKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Bhardwaj, Mr.Narender Kumar & Ms.Naina, Advocates. versus STATE Through: CRL.A. Nos.89/2013, 1430/2012 & 185/2013 ..... Respondent + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.185/2013 DAULAT RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sushil Bajaj & Mr.Aditya Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. The present appeals have been preferred by Ranbir @ Pappu, Ravi @ Ashu, Mukesh Kumar and Daulat Ram against the judgment dated 30th August, 2012 pas...
The New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Narinder Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h November, 2013 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2013 + MAC.APP. 629/2005 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus NARINDER KAUR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Jitender Chaudhary, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. impugns a judgment dated 11.04.2005 aggrieved by the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby while awarding a compensation of `14,85,000/- in favour of Respondents No.1 to 3, the Claims Tribunal directed the Appellant to pay the compensation in the first instance with a right to recover the same from the insured/owner(Respondent No.5) by way of bringing separate legal proceedings as per law.2. The Appellant does not dispute the quantum of compensation awarded and although the insur...
Sanjay Walia Vs. Sneha Walia and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 6684/2010 and CMs No.13219/2010 (stay), 4765/2012 (to restrain petitioner from construction of servant quarter), 4651/2013 (for modification of order dated 15.03.2013) SANJAY WALIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Adv. versus SNEHA WALIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv K. Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No.15746/2013 (of petitioner for waiver of cost imposed on 06.08.2013) Considering the adjournments taken by the petitioner on various dates, as noted in the last order, there is no ground for waiver of the cost. However, the cost is reduced to Rs 10,000/-. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6684/2010 Respondent No.1 is the mother of the petitioner. She filed a petition under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for grant of maintenan...
Satya Dev Pandey and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :17. h September, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d November, 2013 + CRL.A. 491/2000 SATYA DEV PANDEY & ANR. Through : ..... Appellants Mr.D.M.Bhalla, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Satyadev Pandey (A-1) and Ramji Pandey (A-2) impugn a judgment dated 05.08.2000 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.282/1997 arising out of FIR No.697/1996 registered at Police Station Patel Nagar whereby they were convicted under Sections 308/323/34 IPC. By an order dated 09.08.2000 they were awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine `10,000/- each under Section 308/34 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for one year with fine `1,000/- each under Section 323/34 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 15.08.1996 at about 03.30 P.M. at House No.2099/6A, Gali No.15, Pahari, Prem Nagar, Delhi,...
M/S Harbhagwan and ors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.1324 of 2013 & CM No.2514 of 2013 M/S HARBHAGWAN AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Raina, Adv. for R-4 Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-1-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent No.4 M/s. Makkar Store, made a request to the Food & Supplies Department, Government of NCT of Delhi for shifting of his business premises from Shop No.8, Naroji Nagar, New Delhi to P-7, Village Pillanji, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi. The aforesaid application was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner, Food & Supplies. Being aggrieved from the rejection of his application respondent No.4 preferred an appeal under Clause 6 (7) of the Delhi Specified Articles (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1981, before the Financial Commissioner, Delhi. Vide order dated 13.9.2012, which has been impugned in thi...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »