Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raman Aggarwal Vs. Shweta Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 1st , 2013 % + MAT.APP. 24/2004 RAMAN AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Veena Goswami, Advocate with appellant in person. versus SHWETA AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishesh Issar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short referred to as the Act) appellant has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.03.2004 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, in HMA Case No.534/2001 whereby the petition of the respondent/wife under Section 12 of the said Act has been allowed and the marriage between the parties has been annulled by decree of nullity on the ground of impotency of the petitioner.2. Briefly stated that factual background is as under:The respondent wife had filed a petition under Section 12 of the Act against the appellant herein i.e. husband stating therein that ...
Birpal Singh Vs. Lt. Governor (Administrator) Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % + W.P.(C) No.502/2012 & WP(C) No.7562/2012 1st November, 2013 W.P.(C) 502/2012 (item no.18) BIRPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.G.Kapoor, Adv. Versus LT. GOVERNOR (ADMINISTRATOR) DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sahay and Mr. Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advocates for R2/DOE. Mr. K.K.Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi and Ms. Bh anita Patowary, Advocates for R-4. + W.P.(C) 7562/2012 (item no.19) BINU CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K.Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi and Ms. Bhanita Patowary, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI (ADMIN.) & ORS WPC5022012 & 7562/2012 Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing counsel of GNCTD with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. M.G.Kapoor, Advocate for applicant/non-petitioner. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Both these writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment i...
Vinod Kumar and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:25. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on :01.11.2013 CRL.A. 959/2010 VINOD KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mukesh Sharma and Ms.Chaitanya Siddharth, Advocates for Appellant No.1. Mr. Sudhir Nagar and Mr. Mohit Singh, Advs for appellant No.2. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The two appellants Vinod Kumar and Joginder are aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 05.06.2010 vide which they had been convicted for an offence under Sections 302/201/34 of the IPC and each of them had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life as also to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for a period of one year. For the offence under Section 201 of the IPC each of the two convicts had been sentence...
Shri Vijay Kumar Vs. the Chairman, Airport Authority of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2860/2011 % 1st November, 2013 SHRI VIJAY KUMAR Through: Versus ..... Petitioner Mr. D. K. Sharma, Advocate. THE CHAIRMAN, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gossain, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the following two reliefs are prayed for by the petitioner:a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby directing the respondents to pay all the back benefits during the suspension period and pay all the benefits w.e.f. 2002 to 2010, as the petitioner has been acquitted by the Trial Court in the false criminal case; b) Direct the respondents not to deduct the pension which is being fixed at the time of taking VRS (Voluntarily Retirement Scheme) adopted by the petitioner in the year 2009 as the petitioner suffered paralysis attack. c) Pass any other or further orders a...
Manish Kumar Vs. the Chairman, Railway Board and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7268/2012 & CM No.18727/2012 Date of decision:1. t November, 2013 % SH. MANISH KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ayusha Kumar, Adv. versus THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. R.N. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner in the instant case assails the denial of the respondents to undergo the physical efficiency test consequent upon his successfully undertaking the written examination for the post of SubInspector in the Railway Protection Force pursuant to the advertisement issued in the employment notice No.2/2011 in the year 2012. The respondents had invited applications from eligible candidates for filling up the posts of Sub Inspector in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800/- + Grade Pay Rs.4200/- in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) including the Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF). The petit...
State Vs. Rajiv Alias Raju
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.L.P. No.586/2012 Crl.M. No.20039/2012 Date of decision:1. t November, 2013 % STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC with Ms.Charu Dalal, Adv. Versus RAJIV ALIAS RAJU ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kamini Vohra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) Crl.M.No.20039/2012 1. Heard. For the reasons stated, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This application is allowed. Crl.L.P. No.586/2012 2. By way of the present petition filed under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27th March, 2012 whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charges framed against him under Sections 302/307/34 and convicted only for the commission of offence under Section 324/34 IPC in the case arising out of FIR No.86/2004, Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur.3. With regard to an incident dated 25th February, 2004,...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›