Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jasbir Singh Vs. Charan Kaur and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 20, 2013 CM(M) No.1041/2011, CM Nos.16799/2011 & 16800/2011 JASBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.R.S. Sharma, Adv. versus MANJIT KAUR & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr.M.L. Bajaj, Adv. RC.REV. 179/2013 & CM No.7332/2013 JASBIR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.R.S. Sharma, Adv. versus CHARAN KAUR AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.L. Bajaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of the petition, being CM(M) No.1041/2011, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has assailed orders dated 19 th May, 2011 and 26th August, 2010, where the order passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the order, i.e. the eviction order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 26 th August, 2010 in respect of a shop in the property bearing No.XVII/2568, Gali Mandir Wali, Shadi Khampur, New Delhi (hereinafte...
Cci Officers Asosciation and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1542/2000 & CM107232012 (Stay) 20th November, 2013 % CCI OFFICERS ASOSCIATION AND ANR. Through: None. ......Petitioners VERSUS UOI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the petitioners. No one even appeared for the petitioners on 10.5.2013, 30.7.2013, 30.9.2013 and 1.10.2013. It may be noted that this writ petition was dismissed in default on 10.7.2007. Application for restoration was filed and which was also dismissed on 23.7.2007, however, subsequently the matter was restored in terms of the order dated 27.7.2007.2. By the writ petition petitioners are seeking implementation of the office memorandum dated 25.6.1999 issued by the Government of India, scales under IDA Pattern w.e.f 1.1.1997.3. I may note that there is a typing mistake either in the writ petition or in the memorandum because the memora...
Sunil @ Sonu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~ 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 865/2013 % Judgment dated 20.11.2013 SUNIL @ SONU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.B. Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Manvi Priya for Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ASC for the State and S.I. Birender Singh P.S. C.R. Park, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, petitioner seeks a direction to the Jail Superintendent, to make necessary arrangement for conducting a bone age test which is the age determination test, to determine the age of the petitioner.2. As per the petition, the petitioner has served a sentence of 12 years and 4 months out of the total sentence of life imprisonment. The appeal of the petitioner was dismissed by the High Court on 27.01.2010. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on the date of commission of offence i.e. 14.4.2000, the age of the petitioner was 16 years.3. Notice was issued in this matter. A status report ...
Amar Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h OCTOBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 606/2000 AMAR KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.D.Rana, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A. 607/2000 DHARAMVEER @ DHARMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.D.Rana, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Ram Raj @ Rajesh @ Sagar; Amar Kumar Gupta (A-1); Khem Chand @ Sonu; Sarfu @ Govinda; Dharamvir @ Dharma (A-2) and Raj Kumar @ Raju were arrested in case FIR No.532/98 PS Okhla Industrial Area and sent for trial for committing offences under Sections 394/34, 120-B & 411 IPC, on the allegations that on 01.08.1998 at 07.40 P.M. at Service road, D- block, near Water Tank, Okhla Industrial Area, they hatched criminal conspiracy to commit dacoity and pursuant to that conspiracy, robbed Ravinder Chaudhary of cash ` 86,...
Mahesh Mani Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h November, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 1479/2013 MAHESH MANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition u/s 407 Cr.P.C read with Section 482 Cr.P.C filed on behalf of the petitioner Mahesh Mani for transfer of CC No.105/1/09 pending in the Court of Sh. Sudesh Kumar, learned ACMM to the Court of Sh. Gautam Manan, learned Senior Civil Judgecum-Rent Controller, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi on the ground that proceedings under the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 was initiated against the petitioner whereby the learned ACMM was requested to enquire into the extradibility of certain offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner in the United Kingdom. The enquiry was concluded on 11.02.2013. Final arguments were heard by Sh. Gautam Ma...
M/S Freezair India (P) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Com ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CENTRAL EXCISE ACT REFERENCE NO.1/2011 Reserved on:14. h August, 2013 Date of decision:20. h November, 2013 M/S FREEZAIR INDIA (P) LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Ms. Meenakshi Arora and Ms. Pragaya Ohri, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE, DELHI-1 ....... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: By order dated 14th November, 2011, the following substantial question of law was framed in the present appeal:Whether the appellant company is liable and could be assessed for the period prior to its incorporation i.e. 1st April, 1998?.2. As a limited issue arises for consideration, we need not refer to the entire factual matrix except the relevant facts, which are undisputed and admitted. Show cause notice dated 3 rd May, 2000 was issued to M/s Freezair India (P) Limited CB-382/10, Indra Market, Ring...
Sanjay Sethi and ors. Vs. Deepak Sethi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 1736 of 2012 Reserved on: October 28, 2013 Decision on: November 20, 2013 SANJAY SETHI & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Chaudhry, Ms. Rupali Kapoor, Ms. Astha Lumba and Mr. Nikhar Mutwani, Advocates. versus DEEPAK SETHI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. R.N. Vats with Mr. Naushad Alam and Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Pankul Nagpal, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2011.2013 I.A. No.22335 of 2012 (u/O VII R-11 and u/O I R-9 CPC by D-1) with IA17003of 2013 (by D-1 u/s 151 CPC) 1. The background to these applications is that Mr. Sanjay Sethi (Plaintiff No.1) and his mother, Mrs. Raj Sethi (Plaintiff No.2) have filed the above suit against his brother Mr. Deepak Sethi (Defendant No.1) and Mr. Y.P. Chanana, Advocate (Defendant No.2) seeking specific performance of an agreement dated 6th January 2010, and for an injunction restraining Defendant No.1 from act...
SimrIn Singh Vs. Amrit Srinivasan and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :06.11.2013 Decided on :20. 11.2013 + I.A. Nos. 1354/2011 and 6522/2011 in CS(OS) 2258/2010 ..... Plaintiff SIMRIN SINGH Through Mr.Abhijat and Ms.Liza M.Baruah, Advocates versus AMRIT SRINIVASAN & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Vijay Gupta, Mr.B.B.Gupta, Mrs.Geeta Goel and Mr.Chetan Swarup, Advocates for D-1 and D-2 Ms.Rachna Aggarwal, Advocate for D-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(JUDGMENT) I.A. Nos. 1354/2011 (u/S151CPC) & 6522/2011 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) 1. By the present order I shall dispose of the aforesaid two applications. These applications are being disposed of by a common order inasmuch as the facts necessary for disposal of the applications are identical.2. The present Suit is filed seeking a decree of possession pertaining to ground floor of property No.C-777, New Friends Colony, New Delhi 110025 and other reliefs pertaining to other portion of the said property in New Friends Colony and other immov...
Rajendra Kumar Gupta Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Andanr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:20. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 175/2013 & Crl. M.A. No.655/2013 RAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition under Article 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of DD No.46-B dated 22nd September, 2012 under Sections 28/112 of Delhi Police Act, 1978 (for short D.P. Act).2. The relevant facts germane to the present case are that the petitioner whose prosecution is sought to be initiated under Sections 28/112 of D.P. Act is working as an employee at a shop called as M/s Hydrabadi Biryani eating house which is selling readymade food material to its customers from the premises No.G-19, Ground Floor, Aggarwal Metro Height-II, Netaji Subhash Palace, Pitampura, Delhi.3. The alleg...
Chimma JaIn @ Asha JaIn and Another Vs. Preeti JaIn and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. 08.2013 Decided on :20. 11.2013 + I.A. Nos. 2411-2412/2011 in CS(OS) 1937/2010 CHIMMA JAIN @ ASHA JAIN AND ANOTHER..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Savita Rustogi, Advocate. versus PREETI JAIN AND ANOTHER ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manoj Goel, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy and Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.I.A. Nos. 2411-2412/2011(Both u/O7R. 11 CPC) 1. These are two separate applications filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking declaration, partition, rendition of accounts and for permanent injunction. The plaintiff No.1 is the mother whereas plaintiff No.2 and defendant No.1 are the daughters of plaintiff No.1. Defendant No.2 is the biological son of defendant No.1. It is claimed in the plaint that the husband of plaintiff No.1 and father of plaintiff No.2 and defendant No.1 late Sh. Lakhpat Rai Jain shifted to Delhi in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »