Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Kanagasabapathy Vs. Gnana Vairavan and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 22.06.2009 made in M.C.O.P.No.34 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Sivagangai.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellant / claimant challenging the award dated 22.06.2009 in M.C.O.P.No.34 of 2007, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sivagangai 2. The appellant is the claimant. He filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.34 of 2007 before the Tribunal, claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation, for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident, that took place on 22.03.2006. 3.The facts of the case are as follows: - (i) It is the case of the appellant / claimant before the Tribunal that on 22.03.2006 Morning, he was riding a Bajaj motorcycle, bearing Registration No.TN-63-E-5871, belonging to his son, from Sivagangai to Kalaiyaarkovil. At that time, near...
V. Joe Felix Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 07.03.2016 given by the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 07.03.2016 given by the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 07.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
R. Ramakrishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent police to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent police to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 01.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a dispute between the petitioner and his neighbour in connection with which, a Civil Suit is also pending before the District Munsif, Palani and in order to give criminal colour to it, the petitioiner has alleged that he was abused by his caste name. 4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations in the FIR, this is not a fit case to issue a direction to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appr...
Gomathi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register case on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.02.2016 investigate the same and file a final report within a stipulated period and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register case on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.02.2016 investigate the same and file a final report within a stipulated period and thus render justice. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 02.02.2016 has been forwarded to the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sankarankovil. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sankarankovil along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as sta...
S. Mohamed Kalith Udheen Olith Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 16.03.2016 given by the petitioner and to initiate necessary action in accordance with law within teh time stipulated by this Honourable court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 16.03.2016 given by the petitioner and to initiate necessary action in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that this petitioner has given a complaint against his father and brother and they have also given a complaint against this petitioner. 4. Under such circumstances, the respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry in both the petitions and take action in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, this petition is disposed of....
The Block Development Officer, Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, Ramanat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the award, dated 26.08.2004, made in W.C.No.303 of 2001, on the file of Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant, against the award, dated 26.08.2004, made in W.C.No.303 of 2001, on the file of Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai. 2. The appellant is the second respondent in W.C.No.303 of 2001. The respondents 1 to 4 are the claimants. The fifth respondent is the first respondent and the sixth respondent is the third respondent in the claim petition. 3. Facts of the case: (i) According to the respondents 1 to 4, the deceased was working as a Painter and the fifth respondent is the Contractor of the appellant. During the course of employment, he was electrocuted and subsequently, he died. Contending that the deceased died during and in the course of employme...
S. Muthumari Vs. The General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire proceedings of the fourth respondent in his proceedings No.U/W.149/MDU/333/2015 dated 23.09.2015 and No.U/W.149/MDU/333/2015 dated 25.09.2015 and quash the same and permit the petitioner to complete construction works as per the Letter of Acceptance dated 27.05.2015 and Agreement for work dated 03.08.2015 executed by the fourth respondent by extending the time of completion of the work as stipulated by this Court and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire proceedings of the fourth respondent in his proceedings No.U/W.149/MDU/333/2015 dated 23.09.2015 and No.U/W.149/MDU/333/2015 dated 25.09.2015 and quash the same and permit the petitioner to complete construction works as per the Letter of Acceptance dated 27...
Manikanda Guru Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 25.2.2016 in the nature and circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 25.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 23.02.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 25.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With...
T. Pethu Rajeswarai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 2.11.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 2.11.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 29.11.2015, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.399 of 2015. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 29.11.2015. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above dir...
P. Ponram Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.3.2016 and further direct him to investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.3.2016 and further direct him to investigate the case in accordance wit law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 13.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.49 of 2016 for offences under Sections 341, 294(b) and 323 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »