Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balan @ Balakrishnan Vs. The State, rep.by the Inspector of Police, Sa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Crl.P.C. with a prayer to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.135 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Palani, Dindigul District.) 1. On a complaint lodged by one Mamu, the respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.198 of 2014 on 28.10.2014 under Section 392 IPC against four accused and after completing the investigation, filed final report in C.C.No.194 of 2015 before the Judicial Magistrate, Palani for the offence under section 392 IPC, challenging which, the third accused is before this Court. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant, a lorry driver was transporting salt in lorry bearing registration No.KA-21-9973 from Tuticorin to Kozhikodu in Kerala on 27.10.2014. Enroute near Palani, the defacto complainant/driver of the lorry parked the lorry near a tea shop on the Palani-Udumalai main road. The cleaner of the lorry went for tea, and the defacto complainant was standing near the...
S. Soma Selvakumar Vs. State through, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 06.05.2015 within the period stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 06.05.2015 within the period stipulated by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.204 of 2015. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take actio...
Chellathal Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 23.01.2016 in CSR No.8/2016 and to take action as per law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 23.01.2016 in CSR No.8/2016 and to take action as per law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 23.01.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Sivakumar and Another Vs. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in relation to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.176 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.176 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.354 of 2008 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 324 IPC, has been registered against the petitioners/accused. After completion of the investigation, the 1st respondent has filed a charge sheet, which was duly taken on file in C.C.No.176 of 2008 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/A1 and A2 and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in additio...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited Coimbatore Vs. Mathammal ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2015 made in M.C.O.P.No.927 of 2008 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Court, Salem.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company challenging the award dated 06.03.2015 passed in M.C.O.P.No.972 of 2008 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Special District Court), Salem. 2. It is a case of fatal accident. On 10.07.2007 at about 7.10 p.m., near Anna Nagar Bridge, on Mettur R.S to Thermal Road, the Bajaj Motor Cycle bearing Registration No.TN-30-V-1400 driven by the 8th respondent herein came from the opposite side at high speed, in a rash and negligent manner and dashed on the Hero Hondo Motor Cycle driven by the deceased Ramar. As a result of the said accident, the deceased fell down on the road from his motor cycle and at that time the Tanker Lorry, bearing Registration No.TN-67-Q-7173 which came...
M/s. East Gate Apartment Owners Welfare Association rep. by their Secr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's application dated 25.02.2016 under Sections 80 A and 80 (A) (3) of the Town and Country Planning Act and forbear the second respondent from in anyway interfering with the building, particularly by way of locking and sealing and demolition of the same pending disposal of the application by the first respondent.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. According to the petitioner, the members of the Association had purchased the respective flats with undivided share of the land in T.S.Nos.5/1, Part 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d in approved layout at TVTK No.6/2009 in Ponmali Division, Ward AB, Block-1, Tiruchirapalli District from one R.Chandramohan represented by his Power Agent Ravichandran and constructed by the D...
R. Karikalan Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned III Addl. Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District, in S.C.No.137 of 2011 dated 29.11.2012.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.137 of 2011 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 of IPC. By judgement dated 29.11.2012, the trial convicted the appellant/accused under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to under go imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the sole accused is now before this court with this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The appellant/accused is the husband of the deceased Mrs. Baby Shalini. The marriage between them was celebrated around ten ...
M. Kadirvelu and Others Vs. G. Santhanalakshmi and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
1. This appeal arises out of a preliminary decree for partition. 2. I have heard Mr.A.Rajkumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 6, 21 to 27, 29, 30 and 34, Ms.S.Hemalatha, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and Mr.V.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 31 to 33 and 35 to 38. 3. The defendants 2, 3, 6 and 7 are the appellants herein. The first respondent herein filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/6th share in the suit properties and for the grant of mesne profits at the rate of Rs.500/- per month in relation to her share of income, apart from an award for future mesne profits at 6 kalams of paddy per annum for the wet lands and Rs.10/- per annum for the dry lands. 4. The case of the first respondent/plaintiff was as follows : (i) One Tandayuda Appasamy Pillai, who owned the suit properties, died leaving behind three sons namely (1) T.Krishnasam...
Solomon Raja and Others Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in connection with the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.162 of 2015 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodaikanal and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.162 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodaikanal, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.507 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b) and 420 IPC, has been registered against the petitioners/accused. After completion of the investigation, the 1st respondent has filed a charge sheet, which was duly taken on file in C.C.No.162 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodaikanal. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/accus...
Samayan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case and investigate the matter based upon the complaint send by the petitioner dated 13.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case and investigate the matter based upon the complaint send by the petitioner dated 13.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 13.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 13.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offen...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »