Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Balasubramanian Vs The Director General of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.Balasubramanian S/o.Somasundaram Head Constable 1221, Thiruthuraipoondi P.S. Thiruvarur District. ... PetitionerversusThe Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 4. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner dated 18.05.2015 against order of punishment imposed in PR No.32/2012 dated 04.02.2013, in accordance with law. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Deepika Sonali for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi Special Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition is filed for a mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.05.2015 which has been termed as mercy petition as against the punishment imposed in PR No.32/2012 dated 04.0...
Subramanian vs S.Nirmala
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
C.M.P. No.4950 of 2023 in S.A.SR. No. 143273 of 2022T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Earlier, this Court by an orderdated 03.01.2025 allowed the above petition on payment of cost of Rs.3000/- payable to learned counsel for respondents.2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for appellant filed a cost memo for tendering cost of Rs.3000/- and the same is recorded.3. Registry is directed to number the Second Appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order and post the matter on the 3rd week of February 2025. 27.01.2025 rpp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S. Rajeshwari vs M/S. Mount Housing and Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLEMR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMARRAMAMOORTHY1. S.Rajeshwari2. Prashant Durairaj3. Nanditha Lakshmi ... Appellants -vs-M/s.Mount Housing and Infrastructure Ltd., Rep. by its Executive Director, Kalpesh R.Bafna, Office at No.108, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ... Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.01.2024 passed by the Commercial Court, Coimbatore, in Arb.O.P.No.159 of 2023. For Appellants : Mr.N.Nikhilesh for Mr.P.R.Ramakrishnan For Respondent : Ms.R.Vidhya Shankar *****JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Counsel for appellants states that parties have amicably resolved the matter and relies upon a joint memo dated 20.12.2024, copy whereof is taken on reco...
K.Karthikeyan, Vs The Secretary to the
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and M.P.No.1 of 2015 K.Karthikeyan S/o.M.Karunanithi ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary to the Union of India Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change Indira Paryavaran Bhavan Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi - 110 003.2. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary Environment and Forests (FR-2) Department Secretariat Chennai-9.3. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Panagal Building Page Nos.1/54. The Member Secretary Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services Recruitment Committee 9th Floor, Panagal Building Saidapet, Chennai-15. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration to declare Rule 5 of the Special Rules for the Tamil Nadu Forest Subordinate Service Rules as amended in G.O.Ms.No.76 Environment and Forests Department dated 10.07.2014 insof...
S.Muralidharan Vs Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY in S.Muralidharan S/o.P.Sivalingam, F1, No.40, R.S.Sridhar Street, Kottur, Kotturpuram, Chennai- 600 085. ..... Petitioner-Versus-1. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden, Department of Forests, Government of Tamil Nadu, No.1 Jeenis Road, Panagal Building,2. Project Elephant DivisionRep by Dr.K.Muthamizh Selvan / Scientist D, Ministry of Environment Forests and Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhavan, Jorbagh Road, New Delhi- 110 003. ..... Respondents Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the 1st Respondent to raise the Orphaned Valparai Tiger Cub in Captivity since it has lost the fear of humans because 1st respondent violated NTCA guidelines. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muralidharan, Party-in-Person For Respondent(s) : Dr.T.Seenivasan, Special Gove...
K.Ravi Shankar vs Swaroop Chandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CMP NO. 10387 of 2019 IN SA NO. 608 OF 2019 K.Ravi Shankar S/o Late Krishnan,No.87/10 Patel Road, Perambur, Chennai-600011 Appellant(s) Vs Swaroop Chandran S/o C.Deiva Sigamani,No.1 Ramachandran Street, Perambur, Chennai-600011 and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondent(s): Mrs.V.Srimathi for R3ORDERBy consent, C.M.P.No.10387 of 2019 is closed. 03-01-2025 (2/2) vum https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Gevika Agro Food Pvt. Ltd., Vs Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP No.15208 of 2020 Gevika Agro Food Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director Kalyan Kumar : Petitioner Vs 1.Bank of India rep by its Branch Manager Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600001 : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to grant thepetitioners revival package on its loan account Nos. 810030110000078, 81007040410000039, 81007040410000040 vide proceedings - RBI 2019- and guideline issued under circular dated 23.05.2020 by 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Ms.Sangeetha Arunachalam For Respondents 1, 2 : Mr.P.Neelakandan For Respondent No.3 : Mr.C.Mohan for M/s.King & PatridgeORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mentioned out of turn.2. Ms.Sangeetha Arunachalam sought leave to withd...
Premier Distilleries Private Limited Vs State Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.15655 of 2020 Premier Distilleries Private Limited rep. by its Managing Director, K.Sekar, having its registered office at 377, 1st floor, Anna Salai, Pudhucherry 600001. .. Petitioner Vs II Floor, No.32, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai 600008. .. Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for records of the respondent's Bank notice dated 21.08.2020 in SAMB/CLO-II/515 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jayakumar for M/s.N.Murali For Respondent : Mr.C.Mohan for M/s.King and PartridgeORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim appli...
Manmohan Singh Jain Vs The Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.16607 of 2020 Manmohan Singh Jain .. Petitioner Vs Chennai-600 008. .. Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that the terminus a quo is 31.08.2016 for the purpose of deciding the period of limitation by the Tribunals below as well as applying the benefit of the bank's own OTS policy. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.B.Raghavalu NaiduORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None for petitioner. Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim application stands closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.) Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No sasi To: Chennai-600 008. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.(...
Govindasamy vs State Rep.by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.4148 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.18384 of 20241. Govindasamy2. Rajamani ... Petitioners Vs.1. State rep. by Inspector of Police2. S.Subbaiaya ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records and to quash the final report in C.C.No.636 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.2 of Coimbatore. For Petitioner : No Appearance For 1st Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor For 2nd Respondent : Notice Returned Unserved (no such person)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners to quash the final report in C.C.No.636 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.2 of Coimbatore.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. st3. Heard the learned Additional Public prosecutor appearing for the 1 respondent police and perused the m...