Govindasamy vs State Rep.by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1721832

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1721832
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan
Decided On: Jan 02, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/4148/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Govindasamy

Respondent

State Rep.by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 02.01.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice p.velmurugan crl.o.p.no.4148 of 2024 and crl.m.p.no.18384 of 20241. govindasamy2. rajamani ... petitioners vs.1. state rep. by inspector of police2. s.subbaiaya ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition filed under section 528 of b.n.s.s. to call for the records and to quash the final report in c.c.no.636 of 2017 on the file of judicial magistrate no.2 of coimbatore. for petitioner : no appearance for 1st respondent : mr.s.sugendran additional public prosecutor for 2nd respondent : notice returned unserved (no such person)orderthis criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioners to quash the final report in c.c.no.636 of 2017 on the file of judicial magistrate no.2 of coimbatore.2. when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. st3. heard the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the 1 respondent police and perused the materials available on record.4. a perusal of the statements recorded by the investigating officer during investigation shows prima facie material to proceed the case further against the petitioners. the grounds raised in the petition are not satisfied.5. therefore, this criminal original petition is dismissed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.6. the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. index : yes / no speaking order : yes / no neutral citation case : yes/no to1. the judicial magistrate no.2 coimbatore.2. the inspector of police3. the public prosecutor high court of madras p.velmurugan. j.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.01.2025
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.4148 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.18384 of 2024
1. Govindasamy
2. Rajamani ... Petitioners Vs.
1. State rep. by Inspector of Police
2. S.Subbaiaya ... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records and to quash the final report in C.C.No.636 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.2 of Coimbatore. For Petitioner : No Appearance For 1st Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor For 2nd Respondent : Notice Returned Unserved (no such person)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners to quash the final report in C.C.No.636 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.2 of Coimbatore.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. st

3. Heard the learned Additional Public prosecutor appearing for the 1 respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

4. A perusal of the statements recorded by the Investigating Officer during investigation shows prima facie material to proceed the case further against the petitioners. The grounds raised in the petition are not satisfied.

5. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

6. The petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.2 Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras P.VELMURUGAN. J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Govindasamy vs State Rep.by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan