Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Rajapandian Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD R.Rajapandian ...Petitioner vs. Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thenrajan For Respondent : Mrs.Vasantha MalaORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page No.1 of 2J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.kkd2. In view of the above submission coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 07.01.2025 kkd To Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.. Page No.2 of 2...
Vinayagamoorthy, Vs Senior Accounts Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Vinayagamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Senior Accounts Officer,Uthukuli, Thiruppur District. ... Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records passed by the first respondent in order No. Pen.17/III/11714880/2015-2016/ADK/MISC/Order, dated 04.08.2015, quash the same and direct the first respondent to give the Pension Benefits to the petitioner (continuous service sixteen years-24.10.1973 to 28.09.1989).For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs. P. Kavitha, Government AdvocateORDEROn 19.11.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner. Accordingly, it was posted to 20.12.2024. On 20.12.2024 also there was no representation for the petitioner. Again it was posted to today 'for dismissal'.2. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It ...
Mukesh Kumar Purohith vs the State, Rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
Crl.M.P.No.58 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.65967 of 2024SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the above Criminal Revision. 2.Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. 3.Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondent and has no objection in allowing this petition. 4.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.06.01.2025 rsi Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise inorder.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
S.Selvakumar vs the State Rep.by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.60 of 2023 S.Selvakumar ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State Rep.by Inspector of Police,2. SivarajapandianSub-Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records in Crime No.38 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanmuganathan For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.38 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent-Police.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for therespondents-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.38 of 2022 final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate -IV, Coimbatore on 29.01.2024 and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.62 of...
M.SANKARALAKSHMI Vs The Agriculture Production Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP No. 149 of 2025 in WA NO. 3389 OF 2024 M.Sankaralakshmi D/o. V.Muniasamy, 555, 10th Cross Stret, Bank Staff Colony, Mathakottai Road, Thanjavur. and 4 Others Petitioners Vs The Agriculture Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai 009 and 2 Others Respondents For Petitioners : Mr.L. Chandrakumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagu Goutham, Government Advocate-for RR1&2 Mr.V.P.Sengottuvel, Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Dhivakar - for R3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble R.Suresh Kumar J.) The present petitioners, though were not parties to the writ proceedings originally before the writ Court, as against which order the intra court appeal has been filed, if ultimately any decision is taken by this court in the present appeal, that will have a bearing on the service conditions of the peti...
R.Vasumathi vs P.Karthikeyan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL R. Vasumathi ... Appellant Vs. P. Karthikeyan ... Respondent Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984, against the fair order and decree dated 12.09.2018 made in F.C.O.P.No.102 of 2018 on the file of the Family Court, Salem. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance ----- Page 1/4JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. Nisha Banu, J) When the matter came up for hearing on 02.01.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 03.01.2025 under the caption "for dismissal". Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the same caption.2. Again on 03.01.2025, when the matter was called, there was norepresentation on behalf of the appellant and in order to give one more opportunity to the app...
Mr.K.Rajan vs the Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.13725 of 2011 and M.P. No.1 of 2011 K. Rajan, S/o. Kutty, No.13/9, Kamatchi Amman Koil Street, Uraiyur post, Trichy 620 003. ... Petitioner Vs. Foulks Compound, Anaimedu, Salem - 1. Vishwashanthi Nagar, Anaiyur Post, Madurai 14. Page No.1 of 4 No.6/35-A, Gandhi Nagar, Mohanoor Road, Namakkal. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of appropriate writ or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondentorder dated 17.06.2010 under ref No.28825/CD2/2008 and to quash thesame as illegal and invalid and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondent to refund the petitioner's salary of Rs.58,581/- recovered from January 2009 to March 2011. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr. P. Ganesan Additional Government PleaderORDE...
Julie vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1390 of 2023 Julie ... Petitioner Vs.1. State by The Inspector of Police, Chennai, Crime No.700 of 2022.2. Jency Dayalan ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records in F.I.R in Crime No.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaikumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent-Police against the petitioner.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.700 of 2022 final report was...
Julie vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1351 of 2023 Julie ... Petitioner Vs.1. State by The Inspector of Police, Chennai, Crime No.729 of 2022.2. Syed Khaleel Ahmed ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records in F.I.R in Crime No.729 of 2022 dated 04.12.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaikumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.729 of 2022 dated 04.12.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent-Police against the petitioner.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.729 of 2022 final repor...
J.Anbu Tamilarasi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P.Nos.1626 & 1628 of 2023 J.Anbu Tamilarasi, Assistant Commissioner (ST), Commercial Taxes Department, Review Cell, Intelligence-II, Chennai. ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary, The Secretariat, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in connection with impugned orders viz.,G.O(Rt) No.23, issued by the Commercial Taxes and Registration (E1) Department dated 13.01.2023 and forwarded by the 2nd respondent vide Endorsement No.CP2/02-17/33/2022 dated 18.01.2023 and quash the same as consequently to direct the respondent in so far as transferring the petitioner from the post of Assistant Commissioner, Review Cell, Intelligence-II, Ch...
- ‹ Prev
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- Next ›
- Last »