Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gulab Basha vs Ibrahim Basha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Gulab Basha S/o Mehaboob Basha, All Are Res At No.27 Gudiyattam Road, Katpadi-7, Vellore Dist. and 5 Others Appellant(s) Vs Ibrahim Basha S/o Asasmathulla, No.27 Gudiyattam Road, Katpadi, Vellore Dist. and another Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr.C.Prabhakaran For R1 : Died For R2 : No appearanceORDERThis petition is filed to condone the delay of 525 days in filing the above second appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.msrm3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of this petition, this Petition is ordered and delay of 525 days in filing the above appeal is condoned on payment of cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai.4. Registry is directed to number the above second appeal, if it is other wise in order and post the appeal on 24.02.2025 06.01.2025...
The Divisional Manager vs T.N.Rajarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND National Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O.No.110, JN Street, Puducherry - 605 001. Vs Colony, Junction Road, Vridhachalam and Tk., Now Residing at Main Road, Kudikadu and Post, Cuddalore Dist. and another Vs S.Vadivel S.K.Subathra K.R.Gunashekar MRS.RAMYA V.RAO for R1 R2 NDW vide endorsementORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 296 days in filing the appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.Ramya V.Rao, learned counsel who takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the second respondent remained exparte before the tribunal and hence, notice to the second respondent may be dispensed with and also made endorsement to that effect. Therefore, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with.3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of ...
Gogul vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 06.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.2202 of 2023 ---1. Gogul2. Arasu3. Sudha4. Thanikaivel5. Iyanar6. Raji .. Petitioners Vs.2. Jothieshwaran .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records and quash the First Information Report pending on the file of the first respondent-Police in Crime No.577 of 2022, dated 06.12.2022. For petitioner : Mr.J.Ramkumar For respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. for R-1 Page No.1/3 Mr.Kishore Balasubramanian for R-2ORDERThe petitioner has filed this petition praying to call for the records and quash the First Information Report pending on the file of the first respondent- Police in Crime No.577 of 2022, dated 06.12.2022.2. When this petition is taken up for hearing, learned Additional PublicProsecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed before the Judicial Magistrate, ...
M.K.Jabir vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 06.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN1. M.K.Jabir2. M.K.Nasirudeen3. G.Ramanujam4. Anandhabakavan (Anand Madhavan as in FIR)5. Abdul Haris (Haris as in FIR)6. S.M.Aris Mohameed (Haris in FIR)7. Selvakumar8. V.Johnson9. Loganathan (Yoganathan as in FIR) .. Petitioners Vs.1. The State, rep. by Inspector of Police,2. S.Vasanthan Representative of Commissioner, Page No.1/ 2 Nelliyalam Municipality, Pandalur, The Nilgiris-643 233. FIR.No.6 of 2023, dated 10.01.2023 .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records and quash the FIR in FIR.No.6 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent-Police. For petitioners : Mr.B.Ramamoorthy For respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. for R-1 Not ready in notice - R2ORDERThe petitioner has filed this petition praying to call for the records and quash the FIR in FIR.No.6 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent-Police.2. When the peti...
Arul Jothi vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1965 of 20231. Arul Jothi2. Senbaga Valli3. Poovarasan4. Harish5. Sowendar6. Vijaya ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State Rep.by Inspector of Police,2. Susila ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the case pending investigation in Crime No.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 as against the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Praveennath For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.83 of 2018, charge-sheet was filed through e- filing on 30.12.2024 vide e-...
T.Mohan vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1837 of 20231. T.Mohan2. Indian Gas Limited, Suite D, First Floor, Sun Plaza Complex,3. Indian Power Projects Limited,4. Indian Integrated Energy Limited, Suite D, First Floor, Sun Plaza Complex,5. Thamira Green Farms Private Limited,6. Thuthukudi Green Farms Private Limited,7. MRC Services Private Limited,8. Nellai Dry Land Agro Farms Private Limited,9. T.Jawahar10. T.Kalzhahastheeswaran11. M.Anand ... Petitioners Vs.1. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team 21, E.D.F-3, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007,Crime No.88 of 2022.2. V.Gajarajan ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the F.I.R in Crime No.88 of 2022 on the file of the Inspector of Police, CCB, Team 21, EDF III, Vepery, Chennai 07 and quash the same. Fo...
Mahendra Kumar Vs United India Insurance Co., Ltd.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND CMP NO. 10055 OF 2021,CMA NO. 1867 OF 2021 Mahendra Kumar S/o. Nataraj, Old No. 5/25, New No. 4/25, MYK Street, Idayar Palayam, Kuniyamuthur Post, Coimbatore - 39. Vs United India Insurance Co., Ltd. Rajeshwari Complex, No.5/158, Palakad Main Road, Coimbatore - Vs Vs Mr. H. Prosper Mr. J. Chandran For R1ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to permit the petitioner to withdraw 50% of the awarded amount deposited before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore in M.C.O.P.No.552 of 2016 as per the order of this Court dated 12.07.2021 in C.M.P.No.10055 of 2021 in C.M.A.No.1867 of 2021. 2.This petition is vehemently contested by the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent/ appellant on the ground that without any functional disability, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.18,27,840/- for loss of earning capacity and the petitioner sustained only partial disability. 3....
Viswanath vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1709 of 2023 Viswanath ... Petitioner Vs.1. State rep.by Inspector of Police,2. Sathiya Priya ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.9 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police and quash the same by allowing this Criminal Original Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Siddharth For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.R.T.Vijayaraghavan for R2ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.9 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.9 of 2023 final report was filed before the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate...
Jayapal Vs The Joint Registrar / Common Cadre Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P.Nos.3862 & 3685 of 2023 Jayapal ...Petitioner vs. Villupuram District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating in Na.Ka.No8457/2019 Tho.Ve.Sa(15) dated on 30.09.2022 on the file of the 1st respondent and consequential order issued by the 3rd respondent dated 22.12.2022 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sairaman For Respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan Addl.Govt.PleaderJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.Page No.1 of 2 kkdORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscell...
S.Santhi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P.No.3451 of 2023 Santhi ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Government of Tamilnadu, represented by its Principal Secretary, Nagapattinam District. ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.09.2022 for fixing the petition's family pension at Rs.7,850/- + Dearness Allowance + Medical Allowance and any other Allowance to the terms of the G.O.Ms.No.337 dated 14.11.2017 of the Finance (Pay Cell) Department and pay the same to the petitioner along with arrears with effect from 01.10.2017.For Petitioners : Mr.T.M.Pappiah For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajendiran Addl.Govt.Pleader. Page No.1 of 3J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.kkdORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ...