Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Mala vs R.R. Baskar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.No.8316 of 2018 C.Mala ... Appellant Vs. R.R.Baskar ... Respondent Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 against the fair and decreetal order dated 15.03.2018 made in F.C.O.P.No.159 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Vellore, Vellore District. For Appellant : reported 'No instruction' For Respondent : Private notice-not claimed Page 1/3JUDGMENT(The judgment of the Court was delivered by J.Nisha Banu,J.) Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant would state that though he tried to contact his client on several occasions, she is not responding and therefore, he reported 'no instructions'. The notice sent to the respondent was returned as 'unclaimed'.2. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has ...
Tamil Nadu State Transport vs R.Kuppan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Villupuram Ltd., Vellore Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Vellore 632 009. ...Petitioner Vs.1. R.Kuppan2. The Presiding Officer,Principal Labour Court, Vellore ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent pertaining to the order in I.D.No.6 of 2008 dated 12.02.2011 and quash the same. For petitioner : Ms.Pavithra Senior Counsel For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Court Page No.1 of 9ORDERThis writ petition is filed challenging the award dated 12.02.2011 passed by the Labour Court, Vellore (for brevity 'the Labour Court') in I.D.No.6 of 2008. For the sake of clarity and convenience, the petitioner and the first respondent will be referred to as Management and Workman respectively.2. The facts in b...
Dr.Ambedkar Public Social Vs N.Saravana Prakash
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN WMP.No.5335/2020 in WP.No.32460/2019 Dr.Ambedkar Public Social Welfare Association [Regn.No.340/1994] rep.by its Secretary S.Suresh Kumar Duraikannu Salai, Main Road Zamin Pallvaram, Pallavaram Chennai. ... PetitionerVs. 1.N.Saravana Prakash 2.The District Collector 1st Floor, Collectorate Thaiyur Kullak Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Land & Administration, Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer NH-32, Chitlapakkam West Tambaram, Tambaram Kancheepuram. 5.The Tahsildar Pallavaram, Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu. 6.The Commissioner of Munipality Pallavaram Division, Pallavaram. ... RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Special jurisdiction to recall the order dated 20.11.2019 in WP.No.32460/2019. For Petitioner : Mr.S.RameshORDER[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,] (1)The present mi...
The Management of V.G.G.Estate vs the Proceeding Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
The Writ Petition is listed today under the caption for being mentioned.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that thisCourt, by an order dated 02.01.2025, has dismissed the writ petition. However, in the order copy, the date of the order is mentioned as 2015 instead of 2025 and the first respondent name was wrongly mentioned as 'Proceeding Officer' instead of Presiding Officer. Hence, he prayed for suitable directions.3. In view of the above, the typographical error is corrected as thedate of the order mentioned in the order shall be read as 2025 instead of 2015 and the name of the first respondent is the Presiding Officer instead of Proceeding Officer. drl4. Registry is directed to carry out the above corrections and issue fresh order copy. 10.06.2025 drl...
R. Ramasubramanian vs T.a. Kumaravel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
CMP.No.3105 of 2024 CMP.No.3105 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.14568 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 675 days in filing the above appeal.2. Mrs.C.Harini for M/s.M.B.Gopalan Associates, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.3. Though notice was served and the name of the 1st respondent was printed in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of the 1st respondent.4. Heard learned counsel on either side.5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.6. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission.7. It is underscored that in the eventuality of the appellant succeeding in the appeal to be taken on record, he would not be entitled to any interest for 675 days. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Kamalakannan, Vs State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD M.Kamalakannan ...Petitioner vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by is Secretary to Government, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... RespondentsPage No.1 of 4 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2019 and 25.09.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran For R1 : Mr.Tippusulthan Government Advocate. For R2 : Mr.A.Arunbabu Senior Counsel For R3 to R5 : No AppearanceORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2019 and 25.09.2019 respectively.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given the representations to the second respondent d...
Boopathi,(died) Vs K. Govindaraj,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA1. Boopathi,(died)2. G.Bharathi Priya3. R.Balasubramanian ..Appellants(Sole appellant died, A2 and A3 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant vide Order of this Court dated 18.12.2024 in C.M.P.No.22376 of 2024) vs.1. K.Govindaraj2. Rukkumani3. Sagunthala ..RespondentsPRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 28.10.2021 in AS.No.25 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, confirming the decree and Judgment dated 18.09.2017 in O.S.No.34 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tiruppur.For Appellants : Mr.J.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.T.BalajiR.HEMALATHA, J.vumJUDGMENTWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal. He also made an endorsement to th...
The Divisional Manager vs Rubistar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
CMP.No.4045 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.100150 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 138 days in filing the above appeal.2. Though notice was served and the name of the 1st respondent was printed in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of the 1st respondent.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submitted that the 2nd respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant in the petition today.4. In view of the above, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.5. Heard learned counsel on either side.6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.7. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/jud...
S.Amutha vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.31262 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.Nos.17787 and 17789 of 20241. S.Amutha2. N.Subramanian3. S.Sudha4. T.Anbanandam5. A.Arthi6. K.Vairakannu ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station-Panrutti, Cuddalore District2. R.Bhavani ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records and quash the charge sheet filed in C.C.No.147 of 2020 pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panrutti so far as the petitioners/accused-2 to 7 are concerned. For Petitioners : No Appearance For 1st Respondent : S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor For 2nd Respondent : Not ready in noticeORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners to quash the charge sheet filed in C.C.No.147 of 2020 pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panrutti, insofa...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd vs Rajeshwari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
CMP Nos. 4084, 4085 & 4088 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL in Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd No.28, 2nd Floor, North Usman Road, T. Nagar, Chennai-17 ..Petitioner VsRAJESHWARI No.4/137, North Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, and 10 Others ..Respondents For Appellant(s): Mr.Somasundaar N. For Respondent(s):Batta Filed, Condone Delay Petition Only Filed. 8 Copies Of Bring On Record & Set Aside Petition Due Reg Rr4 To 11 -------------- Private Notice R-4 Muniammal No.491, South Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, R-6 Govindaraj No.491, South Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, R-8 Thangamuniyandi No.491, South Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, Tirunelveli District-627755 R-10 Arjun No.491, South Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, R-11 Arun No.491, South Colony, Veeriruppu, Sankarankoil Taluk, R-7 Died R5 & 9 - Aos Not Fil...
- ‹ Prev
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 147
- 148
- Next ›
- Last »