Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Subaramanian vs K.S.Nandhini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
CMP.No.17297 of 2024 CMP.No.17297 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.145733 of 2023M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 385 days in filing the above appeal.2. Mrs.N.B.Surekha, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.3. Heard learned counsel on either side.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.5. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission.6. It is underscored that in the eventuality of the appellants succeeding in the appeal to be taken on record, they would not be entitled to any interest for 385 days. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Amutha vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.07.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.31262 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.Nos.17787 and 17789 of 20241. S.Amutha2. N.Subramanian3. S.Sudha4. T.Anbanandam5. A.Arthi6. K.Vairakannu ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station-Panrutti, Cuddalore District2. R.Bhavani ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records and quash the charge sheet filed in C.C.No.147 of 2020 pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panrutti so far as the petitioners/accused-2 to 7 are concerned. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Vijayakuamr For 1st Respondent : Dr.C.E. Pratap Government Advocate For 2nd Respondent : Not ready in noticeORDERThe matter is placed before this Court under the caption "for extension of time-lower Court" based on the letter dated 13.06.2025 received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore Dis...
The Managing Director vs Shakila
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
CMP.No.18484 of 2024 CMP.No.18484 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.28272 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 9 days in filing the above appeal.2. M/s.G.Daisy John, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the sole respondent.3. Heard learned counsel on either side.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.5. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Ramesh vs B.Lakshmipathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CMP NO. 16148 of 2019 in SA NO. 805 OF 2019 R.Ramesh G.Ranganathan, Plot No.68, B, Block, Thanikachalam Nagar, Ch-110 Chennai Appellant(s) Vs B.Lakshmipathi Deceased,Chennai and 6 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.A.Balasingh Ramanujam S.Shanmugam P.Mahenderchand For Respondent(s): M/s.Madhuri Donti Reddy for R1ORDERBy consent, C.M.P.No.16148 of 2019 is closed. 02-01-2025 (1/2) vum To1. B.Lakshmipathi Deceased, Chennai2. Neelakandan, S/o. Ramaiah, Kolathur Makkaram Thottam, Redhills Road, Ch-993. Vinoth Kumar S/o. Nanda Kumar No.92, 1st Street , Rajan Nagar, Kolathru, Ch-994. SIVAMMA W/o. Late Wiswanath, No.24, Prathiban St, Rajaji Nagar, Extension,5. M.V. Rajasekar S/o. Late Viswanath, No.108, Senthil Nagar, 6th Cross St, Kolathur, Ch-6. M.V. Aparna D/o. Late Wiswanath, No.24, Parthiban St, Rajaji Nagar, Extention, Villivakkam Ch-497. M.V. Suresh S/o. Late Wiswanath , No.24,...
P.Manikandan Vs The University Grants Commission
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Mr.P.Manikandan ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The University Grants Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, 3.The University of Madras, Rep. by its Registrar, 5.S.I.V.E.T. College, Rep. by its Secretary, Gowrivakkam, Chennai 600 073. ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Quo Warranto, calling upon the 6th respondent to show cause by what authority she claims to use, handle and perform the rights, duties, privileges of the office of the Principal in the 5th respondent college and consequently, remover her from that post and pass such further orders.For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran For R1 : Mrs.V.Sudha For R2 to R4 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government AdvocateORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitio...
Ramani Ammal vs Munisamy Naicker
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP NO. 6163 of 2023 AND SA NO. 162 OF 2006 Ramani Ammal (deceased) and 2 Others Appellant(s) Vs Munisamy Naicker (Deceased) and 7 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.S.Ambika for Ms.M.SrividhyaORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to implead the proposed 8th respondent as a necessary party in the above Second Appeal.2. The learned counsel for petitioners/appellants would submit thatpending proceedings, the 8th respondent had caused interference and a police complaint was also lodged by the petitioners, wherein he has agreed not to cause interference by writing on 13.10.2020 before the Baluchettychatram Police Station, Kancheepuram District. Even then, he is disturbing their possession. Hence, necessity arose to file this petition to implead him as a 8th respondent in the above Second Appeal.3. Considering the facts and circumstances and on considering...
M/s Indusind Bank Ltd Vs Jai Mata Di Traders
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND Vs Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017.rep.by its Proprietor Sanjeev, Shop NO.4, Wazirpur More, Farukhnagar Road, Wazirpur, Gurgaon 122 001. Vs C/N-SOLE RESPT-JAI MATA DI TRADERS M/s. IndusInd Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Assistant ViceORDERWhen the matters are taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant in both the applications submits that despite diligent steps taken to locate the vehicle, the applicant as well as the Advocate Commissioner have not been able to execute the warrant for the reason of non-availability of the vehicle. Hence, she seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the applications with liberty to move an application, as and when necessity arises in future. 2.Recording the same, these applications are closed. The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application, if so warranted at the later stage. 02-01-2025 ata To T Nagar , Chenna...
S.K. Somasundaram vs Darshan R. Jain
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 02.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P.[NPD].No.7 of 2025 & CMP.No.36 of 20251. S.K.Somasundaram, Proprietor of M/s.Chennai fuels at No.1, N.S.K.Salai, Arcot Road, Lakshmi Nagar, [Alapakkam], Porur, Chennai 600 116.2. S.Rajan . . . PetitionersVersusDarshan R Jain . . . Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal Order dated 13.03.2023 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.5398 of 2022 by the XXI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai by allowing the above Civil Revision Petition. For petitioner : Ms.F.Prameena for R.Chellamuthu Page 1 / 2N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners and the endorsement made, this Civil Revisio...
M/s Indusind Bank Ltd Vs Kld Creations Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M/s Indusind Bank Ltd Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017. Appellant(s) Vs Kld Creations Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017.Rep.by its Director F-134, Ground Floor, Flat No.A-3, Jawahar Park, Khanpur 110 062. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.Meera Gnanasekar Alice Chitra Y M.Kavita Sharma For Respondent(s): C/n-sole Restp-returned Mr. M. Prabaharan, Advocate CommissionerORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that despite diligent steps taken to locate the vehicle, the applicant as well as the Advocate Commissioner have not been able to execute the warrant for the reason of non-availability of the vehicle. Hence, she seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the application with liberty to move an application, as and when necessity arises in future. 2.Recording the same, this application ...
Tvl.R.M.K. Enterprises Vs The state Tax officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
W.P.Nos.10968, 10966 & 10973 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.11599, 11597 & 11600 of 2021 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J Since learned counsel for the respondents seeks an adjournment, list the matter on 05.03.2024.2. The interim order issued earlier is extended until the next date of hearing. 13.02.2024 rna 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...