Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Praveen Kumar vs the State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGANPraveen Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police (Crime No.1748 of 2020) ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and lay final report in Crime No.1748 of 2020 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muthuramalingam For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation and lay final report in Crime No.1748 of 2020 on the file of the respondent.2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the investigation was already over and the final report was also filed way back on 02.12.2023 before the NDPS Court, Chennai.3. Recording the submissions of the learned...
V.Govindaraj vs the Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
in and [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense withproduction of 'original impugned notices dated 25.07.2024, 05.08.2024, 16.08.2024, 21.11.2024 and 10.12.2024 all bearing reference No.Thakithu-170/2024/A2 issued by the 2nd respondent' {hereinafter collectively 'impugned notices' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity}.3. Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Page Nos.1/34. Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to support affidavitsubmitted that the impugned notices were misplaced and hence, the writ petitioner is not able to file the original impugned notices. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to paragraph No.12 of support affidavit, which reads as follows: '12. I state that I have ...
Rajalakshmi vs the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGANRajalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. Cuddalore District ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to direct the respondents to complete the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.139 of 2023 pending on the file of 2nd respondent expeditiously as possible. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/defacto complainant to direct the respondents to complete the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.139 of 2023 pending on the file of 2nd respondent as expeditiously as possible.2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for therespondents police submitted that the investigation was already over and the charge sheet was also filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thittakkugi on 0...
The Divisional Manager Vs Madhammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
CMP.No.228 of 2025 CMP.No.228 of 2025 in Cros.Obj.SR.No.177264 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1172 days in filing the above Cross Objection.2. Mr.S.P.Yuaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 7.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant submitted that the 8th respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court.4. In view of the above, notice to the 8th respondent is dispensed with.5. Heard learned counsel on either side.6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.7. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the Cross Objection, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission along with CMA.No.2569 of 2021 on 21.01.2025. 07.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Nagarajan vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in W.P.No.31417 of 2023 Afsath Bibi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State represented by its The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.S. Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak, Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S. RAMESH, J.) This Court in WMP.No.15936 of 2025 has granted extension of leave to the petitioner's brother,detenu, S.A.Nawab Khan S/o. Abdul Rahmaan, aged 54 years, convict no.10663, for a period of 3 months i.e. from 05.05.2025 to 05.08.2025.2. The present miscellaneous petition is filed for extension of leave from 05.08.2025 until further order.3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced a report of the Probation Officer dated 25.07.2025 stating that the conduct of the detenu was good during the said period of three months.4...
N.C.Ganesh Babu vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
W.M.P.No.336 of 2025 W.M.P.No.336 of 2025 in W.P.No.294 of 2025MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this miscellaneous petition is ordered, on payment of Court fee. 07.01.2025 (2/2) dpa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 / 1...
Dr. Suba vs Dr.Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.No.29383 of 2024 Dr.Suba .. Petitioner Vs. Dr.Saravanan .. Respondent Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry in DVC.No.118 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.IndrajithORDERMr.S.Indrajith seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this civil revision petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.cse 2.Recording the above said submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for civil revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 07.01.2025 cse Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No To The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry....
M/S Bharathi Gems and Jewels vs Competant Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI 1.M/s.Bharathi Gems and Jewels 2.S.Thuraisingam 3.Vasanthi Duraisingam 4.Yousuff Sheriff 5.Shankar 6.Vasumathi ... Appellants Vs. 1.Competant Authority and Special Commissioner for Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 5. 2.S.L.Anand 3.M/s.Bharathi Gems and Jewels Group of Depositors Association rep. by its President G.E.Krishnan 4.R.Gomathi ... RespondentsPrayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 11 of the Tamilnadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1997, to set aside the order dated 17.07.2003 made in I.A.No.37 of 2003 in O.A.No.14 of 1999 on the file of Special Judge, the Tamilnadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1997 Cases, Chennai. For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Gurunathan for R1 Additional Government Pleader (C.S.)JUDGMENTOn 03.01.2025, when the matter was taken up fo...
H.B.Saravana Kumar vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.Nos.946 & 4382 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.607 of 2024 H.B.Saravana Kumar Petitioner in both Crl.O.Ps. Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Karimangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri. (Crime No.49 of 2024) (Crime No.03 of 2024)2. Sathiyamoorthy Respondents in both Crl.O.Ps.COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in First Information Report in Crime No.49 of 2024, dated 04.02.2024 and Crime No.03/2024, dated 05.01.2024 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and abuse of process of law. in both cases For Petitioner: Mr.R.Harikrishnan For Respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, (for R1) Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.S.Praveennath (for R2)COMMON ORDERThis Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to call for the records in First Information Report in Crime No.4...
Ragunatha Samy Vs Thaiyanayagi Ammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND SA NO. 549 OF 2009 Ragunatha Samy S/o. Chinnadurai Padayachi, Manujakuzhi Village and Post, Chidambaram Taluk. Petitioner(s) Vs Thaiyanayagi Ammal (Died) and 3 Others Respondent(s) Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 41 Rule 19 of C.P.C to set aside the order of dismissal for non prosecution dated 30.03.2010, restore S.A.No.549 of 2009. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.S.Sivaraman for M/s.R.V.Chitra & Associates ----------------ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.2. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 07-01-2025 kv...