Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tvl.R.M.K. Enterprises Vs The state Tax officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
W.P.Nos.10966, 10968 & 10973 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.11597, 11599 & 11600 of 2021C.SARAVANAN, J.Today, this writ petition is listed under the caption, For Clarification at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Mr.D.Vijayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted thatby order dated 02.01.2025, this Court dismissed W.P.Nos.10966, 10968 & 10973 of 2021 and granted liberty to the petitioner to file a Statutory Appeal before the Appellate Commissioner. However, the time limit for filing the Statutory Appeal has not been specified in the said order. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed this Court to specify the time limit for filing the Statutory Appeal in Paragraph No.19 of the said order.3. None appeared on behalf of the respondents.4. Considering the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to specify the time limit for filing the Statutory Appeal in Paragraph No.19 of the said order. Thus, Paragraph N...
Rayappan vs Munusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP NO. 20253 of 2021 AND SA NO. 1433 OF 2005 RAYAPPAN and another Appellant(s) Vs MUNUSAMY Rep.By Power Of Attorney Agent, Pauline Pavaraj and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S. SethuramanORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 103 days in filing the petition to restore S.A.No.1433 of 2005, which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 19.11.2018.2. Mr.S.Sethuraman, learned counsel for petitioners/appellantsappeared and submitted that since the counsel on record went to Madurai and his juniors were attending the lower court, they are not able to attend the hearing on that day. Thereafter, they came to know that the above appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution on 19.11.2018, thereby he was hastening to file the present petition to restore the appeal. Hence, the petition to restore was not filed in time. In view of the same, t...
The State of Tamil Nadu vs B. Soundarrajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
in in AND [Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 251 in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners.3. Despite notice having been served on the respondent, there is no representation.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned. in AND vji5. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [C.S.N., J.] 02.01.2025 vji in...
Varatharajan vs Santhamani (Died) 1. Bhagiyalakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 2/1/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Civil Revision Petition (NPD) No.1719 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.9055 of 2024 Varatharajan ... petitioner Vs Santhamani (Died)1. Bhagiyalakshmi2. Indhurani3. Shanmgapriya @ Priya ... RespondentsPRAYER : Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 15/3/2024 made in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.11 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Bhavani, Erode District. Page No:1/4 For petitioner ... Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For respondents ... Service awaited for R.1 Mr.B.Mohan for R.R.2 and 3. -----ORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-An application has been filed by the revision petitioner before the trial Court in O.S.No.11 of 2017 to raise the attachment passed in I.A.No.7 of 2023, under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the same has ...
K.Periyasamy Vs Dr.P.Senthilkumar IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA K.Periyasamy ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 009. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt ofCourts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orderpassed in W.P.No.5593 of 2020 dated 17.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jaganathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Ramanlal, AAG, assisted by Mr.T.Arunkumar, AGPORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.5593 of 2020 dated Page No.1 of 4 17.10.2023.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedAdditional Advocate General for the respondent submitted that challenging the order passed by this Court in the above Writ Petition, a Writ Appeal has been filed in W.A.No.2861 of 2024. It is further submitted that in the above Writ Appeal, an order has been passed staying the contempt proceedings.3. In view of the abov...
Sumeet Research and Holdings Private Limited Vs Sumeet Appliances Priv ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSESumeet Research and Holdings Private Limited .. Petitioner in all cases vs 1.Sumeet Appliances Private Limited 2.Registrar of Trade Marks, IP Building GST Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032, Tamil Nadu. .. Respondents in all cases Prayer in all cases: These petitions filed under Sections 57 and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 may be pleased to grant the following reliefs: a)That the entry with respect to the subject Trade Mark registration bearing 11 & 7 be rectified to expunge respondent No.1 - Sumeet Appliances Private Limited as the registered proprietor and b)that the respondent No.2 - Registrar of Trade Marks, Chennai may be directed to reinstate the petitioner - Sumeet Research and Holdings Private Limited as the registered proprietor in respect of the subject registration bearing 11 & 7 in furtherance of the relief granted under paragraph 12.1.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vga For pet...
Dr.Navis Jain Chithra Vs Mr.Meru Miller
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Dr.Navis Jai Chithra (Senior principal of RICE - Mathakondapalli Model School, Krishnagiri District) SS4-Staff Quarters, RICE - MMS Campus, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Petitioner Vs. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the Page No.1 of 4order passed in W.P.No.12261 of 2020 dated 27.02.2024, by imposingmaximum punishment. For Petitioner : Mr.Clement Jonathan Ivan For Respondents : Mr.R.Kannan for Mr.J.AravindORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.12261 of 2020 dated 27.02.2024, by imposing maximum punishment.2. The learned counsels for both sides submitted that an EnquiryOfficer has been appointed and he initiated the enquiry as per the directions of this Court in the order passed in W.A...
Masilamani Anbalagan Vs AGNEES NIRMALA AND ANOTHER
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN Masilamani Anbalagan S/o Masilamani, Residing At No.9,Selegie Road, No.7-30,Selegie House, Singapore - 180 009. Applicant(s) Vs Agnees Nirmala And Another W/o Late Mr.Sethuraman Vairavan No.4, Jalan Jaya7, Taman Jaya, Skudai - 81300, Johor, Malaysia. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s.Ramesh Ganapathy N.Hansika Mary Santo Disha J Prethika Ja Vijay N Vishal R Alice Bibiana Bhavana P For Respondent(s): Pn-r-2 M/s Birmingham Industries Private Limited Rep. By Vice President Mr.Saravanan, Flat No.A-3, 3rd Floor, Ramana Enclave, Door No.40/1, Madhavan Salai, Mahalingapuram, Cn-r2-unserved(door Locked)ORDERIn view of the undertaking affidavit given by the 1st respondent/1st defendant in O.A.No.586 of 2024, the application seeking an interim injunction is closed. 02-01-2025 rpl To1. Agnees Nirmala And Another W/o Late Mr.Sethuraman Vairavan No.4, Jalan Jaya7, Taman Jaya, Skuda...
Sidhartha Printers vs the State Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2025
SA NO. 1454 of 2005IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI M/s Sidhartha Printers, Vellore Rep By Its Proprietor T.P. Ulaganambi. and another Appellant(s) Vs The State Bank Of India Road, Vellore. and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.Beula RajakumariORDERBeing satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered as prayed for. 02-01-2025 mps Note to office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps To1. The State Bank Of India Road, Vellore.2. M/s South India Machinery Corporation, Chennai By Its Partner S/.R. Balachandran Having Office At No 18, Sembudoss St, Madras -1. 02.01.2025 ()...
- ‹ Prev
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- Next ›