Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sasikala vs J. Pratyum
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI SASIKALA W/o.Srinivasan, D.No.5, Railway Gate St, Kilambakkam, Urapakkam, Chenani 603 210. and another Appellant(s) Vs J. Pratyum S/o.K.Jaganath, D.No.23/13, Mahadevan St, West Mambalam, Chennai 33. and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr.Ma.Gouthaman For R1 : Person not found For R2 : Mr.T.Lingeswaran For R3 : Insufficient addressORDERThis petition is filed to condone the delay of 31 days in filing the second appeal in S.A.Sr.No.62075 of 20232. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this Petition is ordered and delay of 31 days of filing in the above appeal is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal on 24.01.2025.06.01.2025...
R.Rajakumar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WP No. 22934 of 2018 &WMP No.26828 of 2018 R.Rajakumar S/o. D. Ramalingam, Assistant, O/o. Deputy Director of Health Services, Perambalur & District 621 220 Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health & Family Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 93. L.Subbaih, Superintendent, Primary Health Centre, Munanjipatti, Tirunelveli District Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in R.No.43320/E4/S2/2018-1 dated 19.07.2018 and to quash the same in so far as alteration of seniority and panel position of the petitioner by placing the junior over and above the petitioner and consequently directing the respondents to forbea...
P.Velu Vs V.Dakshinamurthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY P.Velu ... Petitioner Vs. V.Dakshinamurthy The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd Kanchipuram Region Ponnerikkarai Chennai-Bangalore National Highway Kanchipuram 631 552. ...Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed contempt by willful disobedience of the order of this Court made in Writ Petition No.31140 of 2018 dated 30.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Varadarajalu For Respondent : Mr.T.ChandrasekarORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, both sides counsel submitted that the order has been complied with. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. Neutral Citation : Yes/No dnaD.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.dna...
Rajkumari Poddar vs Canara Bank
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLEMR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMARRAMAMOORTHY Rajkumari Poddar ... Petitioner in CRP.776/20201. Susila Poddar2. Vijayakumar Poddar ... Petitioners in CRP.797/2020 -vs-1. Canara Bank, Mint Street Branch, Chennai 600 003. ... 1st Respondent in both CRPs.2. M/s.Hind Enamel Co. (Madras), rep. by its Partner, Anila Jalan.3. Anila Jalan4. Basant Kumar Poddar,5. Sharadkumar Dlamia6. R.K.Jalan ... Respondents 2 to 6 in CRP.776/20202. M/s.Maticon Rep. by its Partner, Mr.R.K.Jalan.3. Sri.Rajendrakumar Jalan @ R.K.Jalan ... Respondents 2 and 3 in CRP. 797/2020Prayer : Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common order dated 05.01.2017 in R.A.Nos.270 and 271 of 2010 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. For Petitioners in both CRPs. : Mr.K.A.Ramakrishnan For Respondents in both CRPs. : Mr.K.M.Anand for R-1 in CRP.776/2020 :...
N.Sulochana & 4 Others vs Kanniammal & 9 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED:03.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN 1.N. Sulochana2. R.Shiyamala3. B. Devi4. C.N.Sivakumar5. C.N.Sugumar ...Plaintiffs vs. 1.Kanniammal2. J.Dhanalakshmi3. J. Rajendran4. J. Saravanan5. V.Vijaya6. P.Maheswari7. S.Balamani alias Bala8. S.Senthil9. S. Thilak10. S. Sandhya ...Defendants(Minors 8 to 10 represented by mother and natural guardian Balamani alias Bala) Prayer: Transfer Civil Suit has been filed praying for a) partition and separate possession of the half share of the plaintiffs in house and ground bearing Door No.10, Old Door No.21, Perumal Koil Garden 3rd Lane, Peddunaickenpet Chennai 79, and lands at KeezhSembudu Village, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai, Sambuvarayar District; b) for appointment of Commissioner of effect partition and put the plaintiffs in possession of their half share in the schedule mentioned properties and for ascertainment of mesne profits from date of plaint till the date of delivery of s...
P.Jayalakshmi vs Pasumarthy Cunniah Chettys
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1.P.Jayalakshmi 2.S.Saiprabha3. Sai Lakshmi Ramji. ... Plaintiffs Vs. 1.Pasumarthy Cunniah Chetty's Trust Rep. by Smt.Reddy Govindamma2. Chinna Reddy Govindamma. Alias Vijayalakshmi 3.Subbu Reddy Govindamma alias Anuradha4. Reddy Govindamma5. Reddy Subbu Govindamma alias Sri Lakshmi6. P.V.S. Kishore Kumar7. S. Srisathyanarayana8. P.V. Seetharam Gupta9. T. Subramania Chetty10. S. Venkata Sai Krishna11. P.K.S. Prashath alias P.Saiprasad12. P.J.K. Sairam alias P. Sairam13. Mrs. Reka Devi14. Mrs. Indira Varma15. Phool Chand16. Muvana Bai ... DefendantsPRAYER: Plaint filed under Section 92 r.w. Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. and Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules for the following reliefs: a) removing the 4th, 6th and 7th defendants from the Office of President and Trustees respectively of the 1st defendant Trust;(b) prohibiting the defendants 2 to 10 or anybody claiming through them from...
Tube Investments of India Ltd. vs Bsa - Regal Group Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.S.No.42 of 2009 : Tube Investments of India Ltd., Represented by its Vice President - Legal & Company Secretary Mr.S. Suresh, 'Dare House', 234, NSC Bose Road, Chennai - 600 001. ... Plaintiff Vs.1. BSA-Regal Group Ltd., Speedwell House, West Quay Road, Southampton, SO15 1GY, England.2. BSA Company Ltd., Anthenia House 10-14, Andover Road, Winchestor, Hampshire, England, SO237BS(2nd defendant impleded as per orderdated 16.08.2023 in A.No.1484 of 2023) ... DefendantsPRAYER: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with orderVII Rule 1 of C.P.C. and Sections 27, 28, 29, 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for the following reliefs:a) permanent Injunction restraining the defendant by itself, its directors, subsidiaries, collaborators, business partners, joint ventures, holding companies, associate/group companies, intending purchasers, legal represe...
P.Jeevanandam, vs Director,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and M.P.No.2 of 2011 P.Jeevanandam ... Petitionerversus1.Director, Information and Public Relations, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Joint Director / The Principal, M.G.R. Govt. Film and Television Training Institute, Chennai - 600 113. 3.M.Ganesamurthy, Skilled Assistant Film Processing M.G.R. Govt. Film and Television Training Institute, Chennai - 600 113. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the recordsof the second respondent in relation to the impugned orderNo.1116/E1/2010 dated 01.06.2011 promoting the third respondent to the post of Skilled Assistant, Film Processing Division of second respondentand quash the same and further direct the second respondent to consider for promotion of the petitioner to the post of Skilled ...
C.Premkumar Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition No.3622 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.3701 & 3702 of 2023 A.Premkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Management, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 641 043. 2.The General Manager, Ooty 643 001. 3.The Branch Manager, Mettupalayam Depot II, Coimbatore Region, Mettupalayam 641 301. 4.The Branch Manager, Gudalur Depot, Page No.1 of 5Gudalur, Nilgiris District-643 211. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Transfer Order dated 30.01.2023 in Proceeding No.1255/E3E/Pathu1/TNSTC(Co)/2023 issued by the second respondent, transferring the petitioner from Mettupalayam Branch-II to Gudalur Branch in Nilgris District and the order No.38817 dated 30.01.2023 issued by the third respondent relieving him from Mettupalayam Branch-II with effect ...
Kanniappan Vs Sampath
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-03-2025
C.M.P.Nos.4468, 4476 and 4479of 2023 in These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 53 days in filling the above Appeal, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 3rd respondent and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 3rd respondent as the respondents 5 to 8 in the above appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these petitions are allowed.(1/2) mps Note to office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal. Issue notice to the newly impleaded respondents, returnable by 27.02.2025. Private notice is also permitted. (2/2) mps...
- ‹ Prev
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- Next ›
- Last »