.....bench to the additional bench, mumbai vide order dated 18th october, 2007.2. we have heard the counsel for both sides and it appears from the facts of the case that respondent no.1 has imported zinc ash, zinc skimming and w.p.(c) 1108/2008 page 1 of 7 zinc dross from us, canada and dubai and other countries from 2002 to 2006.3. there are allegations about the suppression of actual transaction value and misdeclaration of the actual description of goods.4. two show cause notices were issued by the department; one is dated 25th january, 2007 and another is dated 30th march, 2007.5. thus, it appears that: (a) the import of goods was at nhava sheva port, mumbai. (b) the show cause notice of 25th january, 2007 was issued at mumbai. (c) another show cause notice dated 30th january, 2007 was also issued at mumbai. (d) all the transactions being taken place at mumbai and udaipur. (e) registered office of the respondent at udaipur and a corporate office is at mumbai.6. an application was preferred by the respondent under section 127b of the customs act, 1962 for the settlement of cases at a principal bench, delhi whereas, looking to the aforesaid aspects of the matter that the goods.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....as managing director of kavika under the impugned order dated 22.07.2019. the act of nomination is titled as a transfer-cum-nomination (annexure-h). facts of the case:-"3. it is the case of the petitioner that he joined the services of the second respondent on 05.04.1984 as an assistant engineer and subsequently was promoted to the cadre of aee on 29.11.1999 and to the cadre of executive engineer with effect from 22.08.2007. thereafter, to the cadre of superintending engineer with effect from 30.04.2016. that on account of the ruling of the honble apex court rendered in the case of b.k. pavithra, a review of the promotions of certain candidates was necessitated and consequently the promotions accorded to them were revoked and they were relegated to the lower cadre and one 4 such candidate was the third respondent. that on account of the demotion the petitioner moved up in the order of seniority and consequently the petitioner stood promoted as a chief engineer with effect from 30.06.2014 by order dated 16.04.2018 and the third respondent was reverted to the superintendent engineer. that thereafter the state government legislated and promulgated a special enactment called the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....has found that there was no material to establish that the accused or his family members had demanded any dowry. the accused also claims that the facts, as brought out do not indicate that he had abetted the commission of suicide by his deceased wife. factual background 3. on 25.03.2015, at around 01:20 a.m., information was received via a telephonic call that one moni gupta, wife of one rohit gupta was declared brought dead on having consumed thinner. the aforesaid information was recorded vide dd no.17a (ex.pw14a) and assigned to asi balraj singh, who along with ct. arun, reached babu jagjivan ram hospital and mlc no.938(ex.pw7/a) was prepared. vide the seizure memo, four pairs of silver toe rings, one crl.a. 616/2016 page 2 of 15 gold nose pin and one copper ring were seized from the body of deceased. later, the dead body was sent to the mortuary of the abovementioned hospital where ct. arun was deputed to take care of the body. on coming to know that the deceased was married in 2010, he informed the sho of the concerned police station. the sdm was also informed. executive magistrate/sdm, amrinder kumar singh, came to b-57, gali no.2, satya vihar, burari, delhi and he had.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....on instructions from petitioner no.1 who is present in court, has come forward and agreed to pay an amount of ₹ 50,000/- for welfare purposes.11. accordingly, petitioner no.1 is directed to pay an amount of ₹ 50,000/- within two weeks from today and out of the said amount, amount of ₹35,000/- shall be paid in favour of repsodent no.2/complainant and balance amount of ₹15,000/- shall be paid in favour of delhi high court advocate welfare funds.12. it is made clear that if the amount is not paid within the stipulated time as directed by this court, registrar general of this court shall ensure the recovery as per the law.13. for the reasons afore-recorded, fir no.123/2019 dated 06.07.2019 registered at police station jamia nagar for the offences punishable under section 356/3ipc and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. crl.m.c.5388/2019 page 3 of 4 14. the petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.15. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october21 2019 ab crl.m.c.5388/2019 page 4 of 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....parties.2. since similar questions/issues arise for adjudication in these petitions, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. some brief facts necessary to adjudicate these petitions are that the respondent is a part of the krrish group of developers, engaged in promoting and developing real estate projects in delhi-ncr. omp(i) (comm) 285/2019 has been filed on behalf of the huf through its karta, shri m.k. jain; omp(i) (comm) 280/2019 has been filed by ms. neeru jain, wife of shri m.k. jain; omp(i) (comm) 281/2019, omp(i) (comm) 282/2019 and omp(i) (comm) 286/2019 o.m.p. (i) (comm.) 280-286/2019 page 2 of 44 are filed by shri m.k. jain in his personal capacity and omp(i) (comm) 284/2019 has been filed by rishabh jain, son of shri m.k. jain. shri m.k. jain is the general power of attorney holder of the other petitioners.4. a detailed chart of the apartment numbers, with dates and amounts of payments and other relevant details in respect of the seven petitions is scanned and placed hereunder: o.m.p. (i) (comm.) 280-286/2019 page 3 of 44 5. the apartments involved in the present petitions are a part of a project called provence estate, located at gwal pahari, district.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by learned senior counsel for the petitioner but admits, on instructions, that the contract of the petitioner has neither been determined nor any show cause notice has been issued. however, counsel for the respondents submits that this tender has been issued in anticipation, should the petitioner not complete his work within the time allowed and to obviate any delay in awarding a contract to have any remaining work completed at the earliest. he submits that a second contract shall not be awarded till the due process is followed ; and in case the earlier contract with the petitioner is to be determined, a show cause notice will be given and an appropriate order will be passed.7. in view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the respondents, as prayed, the present writ petition is disposed of, binding the respondents to the stand taken by them in court. g.s.sistani, j.anup jairam bhambhani, j.october21 2019/uj w.p.(c) no.11230/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for the petitioner. there is no quarrel with the proposition of law laid down therein. however these cases are distinguishable on the basis of the facts and circumstances stated therein. in the present case, the complainant who is a foreign national (czech republic) has been made to indulge in sexual activity on the pretext that petitioner will marry her after giving divorce to his wife. there are also allegations that the complainant has been threatened by the petitioner. the victim has been forced to change her place of stay twice.9. the question which now arises for consideration is whether the petitioner is entitled to interim protection/anticipatory bail till his regular bail appl no.1393/2019 page no.4 bail application is heard by the learned trial court. i have gone through the material appearing on record. very serious and grave allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. it is alleged that the petitioner had met the complainant in a party and complainant was made to believe that though petitioner is a married man but he is separated from his wife and is in the process of taking divorce. the petitioner had thereafter started visiting the complainant during.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....application remains pending, counsel for the parties agree that the present application filed in the meanwhile be taken up for hearing first. a. facts 3. the plaintiff is a company incorporated in england which specialises in the marketing and sourcing of pharmaceutical products. the defendant, as proprietor of a concern known “medicine house”, is engaged in the business of supplying such products. the present suit arises out of two purchase orders placed by the plaintiff upon the defendant. purchase order no.205 dated 18.10.2014 (hereinafter referred to as "po205) was for supply of specified quantities of letairis capsules of stipulated dosages. purchase order no.213 dated 05.01.2015 (hereinafter referred to as "po213) was in respect of a drug known as kuvan powder. the case of the plaintiff is that, pursuant to the aforesaid purchase orders, the defendant issued proforma invoices stipulating inter alia that payment was required to be made in advance and that the delivery time in respect of invoices were three weeks and four weeks respectively. the plaintiff remitted cs(os) 3148/2015 page 2 of 29 the amounts due under the invoices. however, it is undisputed that no.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and he has been identified by si vinay kumar /io because the respondent no.2/complainant herein, is accused in case fir no.141/2006 and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement before delhi mediation centre, karkardooma courts, delhi vide settlement deed dated 11.01.2019.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.11. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.141/2006 dated 01.04.2006, registered at ps khajuri khas aand consequent proceedings crl.m.c. 5372/2019 page 2 of 3 emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october21 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5372/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in the interest of justice.” 2. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the communications, which are under challenge, were in fact issued for more than one person. one such person is m/s. ambika vikas udyog. m/s. ambika vikas udyog had earlier filed a writ petition being wp(c) no.3624/2018 and the said writ petition was allowed by the division bench of this court vide judgment and order dated 30th may, 2019, which is at annexure 11 to the memo of this writ petition.3. learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that this writ petition is also covered by the aforesaid decision passed in wp(c) no.3624/2018 vide judgment and order dated 30th may, 2019 for the same reasons as given in the order dated 30th may, 2019 in wp(c) no.3624/2018.4. keeping in view the aforementioned facts, this writ petition is allowed and the communications dated 29th october, 2015 and 17th december, 2015, which are at annexure a-3 to the memo of this writ petition, are hereby quashed and set aside. mmtc is directed to proceed in the matter as if the aforesaid two communications dated 29th october, 2015 and 17th december, 2015 of directorate of revenue intelligence are no longer.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT