.....c.r.p. 110/2019 page 1 of 2 and since the property could not be divided by metes and bounds, the court directed that the property be sold by way of public auction. consequent to which, the impugned order was passed approving the proclamation of the property.3. learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has no objection to the auction of the property provided the petitioner is given an opportunity to participate in the auction.4. learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents may also be permitted to participate in auction.5. learned counsel for the petitioner further seeks leave to withdraw the petition.6. 7. in view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. it is, however, directed that all the parties to the suit including the petitioner and the respondents would be permitted by the trial court to participate in the public auction directly or through their nominees/representatives. petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under the signatures of the court master.8. 9. october22 2019/st sanjeev sachdeva, j c.r.p. 110/2019 page 2 of 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 10.04.2019 before the meditation centre, rohini court, delhi and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the complainant is present with her counsel and has been identified by si vijay singh of police station vijay vihar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute any further.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.10. for the reasons afore-recorded, of fir no.1162/2017 dated 12.09.2017 registered at police station vijay vihar and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.11. the petition is allowed accordingly. crl.m.c. 5439/2019 page 2 of 3 12. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october22 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5439/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....had met, but the said meeting was postponed only to be held next on 28.05.2018. by 14.05.2019, almost six months had already expired. despite the fact that the appellant/ndmc has a full-fledged legal department, which is well aware of the consequences of non-filing of an appeal and the fact that the limitation was running, no concrete steps were taken to file an appeal. instead, the application states that the council constituted a committee to examine the matter and the recommendation made by the committee of accepting the arbitral award, was also turned fao(os) (comm) 297/2019 page 3 of 6 down. thereafter, the council directed that an inquiry be conducted by the cvo.6. merely, because a vigilance inquiry was initiated in the matter would hardly be a ground to condone the delay. even when the appeal was filed by the appellant/ndmc on 14.03.2019, we are told that the vigilance proceedings were continuing. that being the position, the explanation offered for non-filing of the appeal due to pendency of the vigilance inquiry, would hardly cut any ice. quite apparently, the present appeal is patently belated and no just or sufficient cause has been shown by appellant/ndmc for.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case fir no.0029/2018 u/s 420/468/471 ipc registered at police station- k.p. pur.2. in brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant is the co- owner of the property bearing no.289, gurudwara road, punjabi bagh, kotla mubarakpur, new delhi. initially in the year 1966 late sh. mangat ram aggarwal, father of the petitioner, resident of f-470, 471 and 472, krishna gali, kotla mubarakpur, new delhi was inducted as a tenant in respect of one shop on the ground floor of the said property. after the death of sh. mangat ram aggarwal, the petitioner inherited the tenancy rights and continued to pay rent which was collected by the grand-father of the complainant. the complainant along with other co-owners had filed an eviction petition no.rc/arc/5022/2016 against the petitioner and his brother tek chand aggarwal for eviction from the property in question in the year 2014. in those proceedings, the petitioner had throughout admitted himself to be the tenant having inherited the tenancy rights from his late father but during the pendency of the eviction petition the petitioner along with his co-accused filed an application to place.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....regulating the procedure to be followed by the estate officer in exercise of powers under the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act.13. article 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india confers in all citizens, the right to practise on any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. article 19(6) however empowers the state to make any law imposing, in the interest of general public, reasonable restrictions on the cs(os) 540/2019 page 3 of 6 exercise of the right conferred by article 19(1)(g). thus, the restriction, if any on exercise of fundamental right under article 19(1)(g) has to be by law enacted by the parliament or the state legislature and not by executive guidelines, as the direct selling guidelines, 2016 appear to be.14. though the plaintiff, in the plaint has suggested that the goods being sold on the platform of defendant no.1 are counterfeit goods but the counsel for the plaintiff, on enquiry whether any testing has been got done by the plaintiff of the impugned goods being sold, answers in the negative and contends that only because the goods are being sold at much lower price than the price which the plaintiff has stipulated, the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for the marriage of his daughter which is scheduled for 09.11.2019. status report has been handed over in court. same is placed on record. the fact regarding the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner has been verified by the station house officer, p.s.: domestic airport, new delhi. keeping in view the fact that the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner is scheduled for 09.12.2019, he (petitioner) is directed to be released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his executing a personal bond in the sum of rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the jail superintendent, subject to following conditions: (i) the petitioner will not leave national capital territory of delhi without prior permission of the court; (ii) he will furnish to the investigating officer his mobile number and residential address where he will stay during the period of parole; (iii) he will report to the concerned station house officer (sho) /investigating officer (io), on every monday; (iv) in case of any change in his residential address or the mobile number, he will inform the sho/io; the petition is disposed of, in above terms......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....held as under:-"“ 29. ....the victim in her statement recorded under section 164 cr. p.c. did not allege any sexual assault by the accused and infact stated that the accused had not done any wrong act with her. she also denied that the complaint ex. pw3/a was written at her instance and stated that the same was written by the police and she and her mother only signed the same and she had not even read the contents of the said complaint.30. pertinently, in her testimony recorded before the court, the victim has supported the allegations made in her complaint and deposed that she did not give a correct statement before the ld. mm as the parents of the accused had assured her that they would get her married with the accused. she also stated that the ld. mm recorded the same statement which she had given.31. it is noteworthy that the victim also deposed that she did not meet the parents of the accused or the accused himself between the period intervening the registration of the fir on 03.06.2015 and recording of her statement before the ld. m.m. under section 164 cr.p.c. ex. pw3/b on 06.06.2015 and she volunteered that she was asked by the previous advocate to give a wrong.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 26.08.2019 passed by the central administrative tribunal (the ‘tribunal’) in oa. no.1158/2019.5. brief facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of this petition are that respondent no.1 is an officer of the indian railway service of signal engineers of the 1986 batch. respondent no.1 filed w.p.(c) 11238/2019 page 1 of 6 an oa before the tribunal seeking a direction to the petitioners to be posted as divisional railway manager (drm). at the time of filing of the oa, respondent no.1 was working as chief workshop manager, signals workshop, ghaziabad. admittedly, respondent no.1 became eligible to be considered for being included in the panel for appointment as drm in the year 2016-17. it is also an admitted fact that he was not empanelled since two charge memos dated 16.03.2012 and 08.09.2015 were pending against him.6. by an order dated 11.01.2016, punishment of stoppage of two increments was imposed upon respondent no.1 in the first charge memo; while in the second charge memo, a minor penalty of ‘censure’ was imposed. an appeal was filed by respondent no.1 against the order of punishment; and while the appeal was.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....through: mr. rajat aneja and ms. rajula gaur, advs. for r-6 ........ respondents coram: hon'ble the chief justice hon'ble mr. justice c.hari shankar order2210.2019 % d.n. patel, chief justice (oral) w.p.(c) 748/2019 1. a letter written by the citizens of delhi has been converted into a public interest litigation which is about the unauthorised use of the land and properties situated at village bhatti, saket, new delhi.2. we have heard counsel appearing for the respondent no.6 who has filed a detailed affidavit and has submitted that respondent no.6 and her family members are the joint owner of the properties i.e. khasra nos. 41 and 44 of village bhatti, saket, new delhi. it is also submitted by counsel for the respondent no.6 that there is no illegal construction nor any illegal activity is going on at the premises in question. moreover, it w.p.(c) 748/2019 page 1 of 2 is also submitted by counsel for the respondent no .6 that firs have been registered against the persons, who have written such type of letter to this court and in which charge sheet have also been filed and they are facing the trial of the offences pointed out in the charge sheet which is ongoing.3. in view of the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for postgraduate courses.8. in support of this submission, mr. apurb lal, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, has drawn my attention to the fact that when the petitioner became aware of the fact that he could seek admission under the ews category, he had made an application to the chairperson, central admission w.p.(c)no.9296/2019 pg.2 of 6 grievance redressal committee, university of delhi on 20.08.2019.9. the contention is that despite such an application being made, there was no resolution of the grievance articulated in the complaint and, therefore, the petitioner was compelled to approach this court.10. the record shows that on 27.08.2019, after briefly recording the petitioner’s grievance, notice was issued in the writ petition. on the returnable date i.e. 02.09.2019, the matter was adjourned due to unavailability of counsel.11. on the date i.e. 05.09.2019, mr. rupal had sought adjournment in the matter to obtain instructions. mr. rupal also made a statement that if a seat was vacant, the same would not be filled-up.12. on 11.09.2019, the captioned writ petition was taken up along with w.p.(c)no.9635/2019, titled shashwat tyagi v. university of delhi. on that.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT