.....by the cat on 6th december, 2012, the operative portion of which reads as under: “14. looking to all aspects of the matter and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the impugned orders cannot sustain for the reasons indicated above. in the result, the impugned letters dated 20.11.2067 (annexure a-1), 23.01.2007 (annexure a-2) and 26.05.2010 (annexure a-3) are quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondents to reconsider the applicant's representation by the competent authority, i.e., the authority higher than the accepting authority.15. the exercise, as ordained above, shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of nine weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. in case the applicant succeeds in upgrading his acrs for the year ending march, 2001 and march, 2003, a review dpc needs to be convened to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the sag level with effect from the date when his juniors have been promoted. in case the adverse order is passed against the applicant either in upgrading the acrs or in review dpc, the applicant.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....‘capable of earning’ and ‘actual earning’ are two different requirements. merely because wife is capable of earning was held not to be a sufficient reason to reduce the maintenance awarded by the family court.9. the petitioner’s aforementioned contention, in absence of any supporting document, remains a disputed question and needs to be tested in crl.rev.p. 751/2018 page 3 of 4 trial. the family court has recorded in the impugned order that any amount paid as maintenance in favour of the respondent/wife and her minor child for the period in question would be liable to be adjusted.10. in view of the above discussions, i find no illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the family court. the revision petition is dismissed accordingly. miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. manoj kumar ohri, j december06 2019 ga crl.rev.p. 751/2018 page 4 of 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioner herein was arrayed as respondent no.1 while respondents 3 to 5 were arrayed as... respondents 2 to 4.3. briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the above revision petition are as follows:4. the respondents 1 and 2 instituted a suit in o.s.no.2018/1995 in the court below for dissolution of the partnership constituted under partnership deed dated 11.03.1983 and for other reliefs. in the said suit, the petitioner herein was arrayed as defendant no.1 while the respondents 3 to 5 were arrayed as defendants 2 to 4. in the said suit, it was the specific contention that the plaintiffs and defendants constituted a partnership firm known as m/s.mahaveer enterprises by a deed of partnership dt.11.03.1983 under which each of the partners had specific shares. it was also contended that the suit schedule property purchased in the name of the first defendant who was the managing partner on 19.12.1983 was for and on behalf of the partnership firm and for the benefit of all the partners of the firm.4. the plaintiffs further contended that since certain disputes arose between the plaintiffs and the defendants, in particular, the defendant no.1 with regard to the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....upon by the appellant, will have no effect unless necessary amendment is being made in the rules for the appointment of instructors in the state.8. rule 8 of the amended rules has prescribed the following academic qualifications: “8. academic qualification – (1) a candidate for recruitment to the post of instructor other than the post of language instructor (hindi/english) in the service must possess the following qualifications: (1) educational - (i) must have passed intermediate examination of the board of high school and intermediate education, uttar pradesh or an examination recognised by the government as equivalent, thereto. (ii) must have obtained a certificate in the respective trade from the national council for training in vocational trades. or must have obtained national apprenticeship certificate in the respective trade. or **** ****” 9. we find that the stand of the state that appellant is not possessed of educational qualifications is not tenable. the eligibility condition is that a candidate must have obtained a certificate in respective trade from ncvt. it is not necessary that a qualification prescribed in the rules has to be possessed in one certificate......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for the balance amount of ₹1,75,000/- (rupees one lakh seventy five thousand) is handed over to the respondent no.2 today in the court.9. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si - asi anil kumar/io of police station – kanjhawala, delhi and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute crl.m.c. 6240/2019 page 2 of 3 the matter any further.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.11. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.876/2015 dated 30.12.2015 registered at police station – kanjhawala, delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge december05 2019 pb crl.m.c. 6240/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....candidates, the respondent in w.p.(c) no.5642/2018 is a scheduled tribe (st) candidate.13. the common issue in all these petitions stems from the fact that the... respondents, one of whom is a st, and the remaining sc candidates, sought the benefit of reservation in the post for which they applied. however, their candidature was rejected on the ground that for the period between 4th august, 2009 and 12th september, 2012, the benefit of reservation in respect of posts/services under the gnctd and local/autonomous bodies under the government was not being granted to sc/st candidates hailing from states/union territories („uts‟) other than delhi. this policy was adopted in view of the decision of the supreme court subhash chandra v. dsssb and sarv rural and urban welfare society v. union of india (2009) 15 scc458 which held that scs/sts moving from one state to another state w.p.(c) 5640/2018 & other connected matters page 6 of 10 or ut shall not be entitled to carry their reservation to the state or union territory to which they have moved.14. a full bench of this court subsequently by its decision dated 12th september, 2012 in w.p.(c) no.5390/2010 deepak kumar v. district.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of learned counsel for the petitioner that m/s. chet ram sanjay kumar is only a trade name and not an entity is not believable in view the fact that there is admittedly a bank account in the name of m/s. chet ram sanjay kumar as the cheques are being issued from the said name and the contention of the petitioner himself is that the payment is made from the account of m/s. chet ram sanjay kumar. accordingly, the contention on behalf of the petitioner that the petition has not filed in the correct name does not have any merit.21. in any event, petitioner claims to be the sole proprietor of m/s. chet ram sanjay kumar and the grandson of sh. chet ram and claims to be in exclusive possession. no prejudice is caused to the petitioner.... petitioner has filed leave to defend application, which has been considered by the rent controller and even by this court on merit and as such no prejudice is caused to the petitioner.22. the second contention that the eviction petition is liable to be dismissed as it does not disclose any cause of action and does not state the basic particulars for eviction, is also not sustainable inasmuch as in paragraph 18(4) and (5) of the eviction.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of the implementation of the recommendations of the 4th and 5th cpcs, the supreme court, while answering issues (i) and (ii) held as under: “the fact that appellant has implemented the earlier orders passed by the central administrative tribunals and the high courts and issued order for including special pay in the pay for the purpose of computation of pension, the union of india is not precluded to raise the issues again, the principle of res judicata or estoppel are not attracted.” 9. in coming to the above conclusion, the supreme court relied on its own judgment in b. j.akkara v. union of india (2006) 11 scc709 10. the supreme court then took up the main issue, i.e. issue (iii) and held as under: w.p.(c) 8705/2014 & w.p.(c) 2262/2015 page 5 of 8 “29. the definition of fundamental rule 9(21)(a)(i) clearly excludes following two from the definition of pay, i.e., (i) the special pay or, (ii) pay granted in view of his personal qualifications. the special pay as occurring in fundamental rule 9(21)(a)(i) has to take colour from the definition of special pay as contained in rule 9(25). the special pay as defined in rule 9(25) is sanctioned to a government servant or to a.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....candidates, the respondent in w.p.(c) no.5642/2018 is a scheduled tribe (st) candidate.13. the common issue in all these petitions stems from the fact that the... respondents, one of whom is a st, and the remaining sc candidates, sought the benefit of reservation in the post for which they applied. however, their candidature was rejected on the ground that for the period between 4th august, 2009 and 12th september, 2012, the benefit of reservation in respect of posts/services under the gnctd and local/autonomous bodies under the government was not being granted to sc/st candidates hailing from states/union territories („uts‟) other than delhi. this policy was adopted in view of the decision of the supreme court subhash chandra v. dsssb and sarv rural and urban welfare society v. union of india (2009) 15 scc458 which held that scs/sts moving from one state to another state w.p.(c) 5640/2018 & other connected matters page 6 of 10 or ut shall not be entitled to carry their reservation to the state or union territory to which they have moved.14. a full bench of this court subsequently by its decision dated 12th september, 2012 in w.p.(c) no.5390/2010 deepak kumar v. district.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from the tenanted premises being one shop measuring 19 ft. x7ft. (12.35 sq. meters approximately) bearing municipal no.4630, ground floor, ward no.7, main bazaar, ajmeri gate, delhi-110006, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from petitioner, who is present in court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.4.... petitioner who is present in court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 04.06.2020.... petitioner further undertakes that he shall continue to pay use and occupation charges at the monthly rate of rs. 66.17 per month.5.... petitioner further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before he vacates the premises. he further undertakes that he shall not sublet, assign or part with the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT