.....present writ appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 24th july 2020 passed in writ petition no.3283 of 2020, has filed this writ appeal.2. brief facts of the case are: the appellant-petitioner was appointed as a daily wage employee along with others with the second respondent- corporation. the appellant was appointed on 04.10.1998 as ‘mali’ a group-d post on monthly wages. the appellant has not submitted any document to show the date of birth at the time of joining the service. while he was working, he has been treated as time scale employee with effect from 24.11.1995 by publishing the list and their scales were fixed. the appellant recently noticed that his date of birth was wrongly mentioned - 3 - as 28.02.1960 instead of 15.10.1969 in the list published by the second respondent. the petitioner gave a representation enclosing sslc marks card on 31.12.2018 requesting the second respondent to correct his date of birth. the second respondent after examining the representation and documents produced along with it, issued an endorsement dated 13.02.2019 rejecting the representation of the appellant- petitioner for correction of date of birth. the petitioner aggrieved by the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....present writ appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 24th july 2020 passed in writ petition no.2490 of 2019, has filed this writ appeal.2. brief facts of the case are: the appellant-petitioner was appointed as a daily wage employee along with others with the second respondent- corporation. the appellant was appointed as a ‘mali , a group- d employee post, on 01.05.1986. the appellant has not submitted any document to show the date of birth at the time of joining the service. while he was working, he has been treated as time scale employee with effect from 24.11.1995 by publishing the list and their scales were fixed accordingly as per annexure-a by the second respondent.-. 3 - the appellant noticed that his date of birth was wrongly mentioned as 28.02.1959 instead of 02.04.1966 in the aforesaid list. after noticing the said fact, the appellant made a representation on 07.07.2018 to the second respondent enclosing his school document and requesting the second respondent to rectify his date of birth. the second respondent issued an endorsement dated 01.08.2018, as per annexure-d, rejecting the representation made by the appellant-petitioner for rectification of date of birth......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....present writ appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 24th july 2020 passed in writ petition no.2488 of 2019, has filed this writ appeal.2. brief facts of the case are: the appellant-petitioner was appointed as a daily wage employee along with others with the second respondent- corporation. the appellant was appointed as a ‘mali , a group- d employee post, on 05.11.1988. the appellant has not submitted any document to show the date of birth at the time of joining the service. while he was working, he has been treated as time scale employee with effect from 24.11.1995 by publishing the list and their scales were fixed accordingly as per annexure-a by the second respondent.-. 3 - the appellant noticed that his date of birth was wrongly mentioned as 20.03.1959 instead of 06.07.1968 in the aforesaid list. after noticing the said fact, the appellant made a representation on 03.03.2016 to the second respondent enclosing his school document and requesting the second respondent to rectify his date of birth. the second respondent issued an endorsement dated 03.12.2018 rejecting the representation made by the appellant-petitioner for rectification of date of birth. the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....fine of rs.10,000/- and with a default clause that in default of payment fine, he shall further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.3. brief facts: in the present case, minor-child (‘victim’ hereafter), aged 07 years at the time of commission of offence i.e., on 10.01.2016, on which date it is alleged that the victim and her brother p.w.16-shivanand had gone for collecting fire wood at about 4.30 p.m. it is further stated that appellant-basappa knowing fully well the caste of the victim that she belongs to scheduled community, came over there in the guise of helping the victim and her brother p.w.16., while collecting fire wood, had taken the victim to the land bearing r.s.no.15, which is owned by p.w.13 and committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim. the complainant being mother of the victim had returned to the house at 6.00 p.m. after attending coolie 4 work along with her sister-in-law and spotted her daughter on the lap of her grandmother and the victim was found crying, upon enquiry, the victim told that the appellant had taken her to the land by saying that he would help her in collecting fire wood and under that pretext committed rape on her and then.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....shall rely on common evidence and the issues raised and the relief sought is also common to all the complainants . it is submitted that under these facts and circumstances the complainants have made the present application seeking permission for instituting the present complaint jointly, having commonality of interest.4. that no prejudice shall be caused to the opposite party if the complainants are allowed the present complaint jointly however, grave loss and injury shall be caused to the complainants if the present application is not allowed. institute to 5. that the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the complainants who have been suffering in the hands of the opposite party who has offered the possession of their respective flats with delay and in the garb of offering possession is now demanding illegal charges to the tune of seven to eight lacs per flat and is further resorting to illegal acts of giving possession of the respective flats to the complainants in absence of an occupancy certificate.” (emphasis supplied) 5 the relief sought in the application was in the following terms: “a) allow present application and admit the present complaint of the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....site visits had been initiated for the project “till we receive the occupancy certificate for clusters a, b and c”. this is an admission of the fact that until then the occupation certificate had not been received. the obligation to handover possession within a period of thirty-six months was not fulfilled. 6 6 the first batch of nine flat purchasers moved a consumer complaint before the ncdrc complaining of a breach by the developer of the obligation, contractually assumed, under the terms of the aba. since the nine complainants purported to represent the entire group of flat purchasers, a notice of the complaint under section 12(1)(c) of the consumer protection act 19863 was published in the newspapers. 7 numerous applications for impleadment were allowed by the ncdrc and an amended complaint was ordered to be filed. on the complainants moving an application under section 12(1)(c), the ncdrc by its order dated 21 november 2017 permitted them to file the complaint on behalf or for the benefit of all the flat buyers who were interested in the reliefs. however, flat buyers who had (i) executed deeds of conveyance; or (ii) executed affidavits while accepting the agreed.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by this judgment. 113. for the sake of convenience, rank of the parties in these appeals, are referred to with their status before the trial court. facts:4. the relevant facts, for the purpose of adjudication of these appeals, are as under: plaintiffs herein and another set of plaintiffs who were similarly placed, have filed suits in original suits no.20/2014 and 22/2014 on the file of the senior civil judge, kumta, against the defendants therein seeking reliefs of damages and permanent injunction. since the learned presiding officer has expressed his opinion of displeasure in hearing the matter, petition was moved before the district court, karwar for transferring the suits, however, the said request for transfer was rejected by the district and sessions judge, uttara kannada, karwar. being aggrieved by the same, the defendant no.1 has filed wp no.59527 of 2015 and connected matters before this court and this court, by its order dated 28th march, 2016 allowed the writ petition and order passed by the principal district and sessions judge, karwar was set aside and the 12 original suits no.20 of 2014 and 22 of 2014 pending consideration on the file of the senior civil judge,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by this judgment. 113. for the sake of convenience, rank of the parties in these appeals, are referred to with their status before the trial court. facts:4. the relevant facts, for the purpose of adjudication of these appeals, are as under: plaintiffs herein and another set of plaintiffs who were similarly placed, have filed suits in original suits no.20/2014 and 22/2014 on the file of the senior civil judge, kumta, against the defendants therein seeking reliefs of damages and permanent injunction. since the learned presiding officer has expressed his opinion of displeasure in hearing the matter, petition was moved before the district court, karwar for transferring the suits, however, the said request for transfer was rejected by the district and sessions judge, uttara kannada, karwar. being aggrieved by the same, the defendant no.1 has filed wp no.59527 of 2015 and connected matters before this court and this court, by its order dated 28th march, 2016 allowed the writ petition and order passed by the principal district and sessions judge, karwar was set aside and the 12 original suits no.20 of 2014 and 22 of 2014 pending consideration on the file of the senior civil judge,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the 5 present petition is not maintainable. accordingly, he seeks to reject the application.7. learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2/ defacto complainant has filed statements of objection opposing grant of bail to the petitioners contending in the same line as learned hcgp. he has further contended that in the event of grant of bail to the petitioners, they may threaten the complainant and other prosecution witnesses. accordingly, he sought to reject the petition.8. i have perused the complaint averments. it is stated that at about 8.30 p.m., on 25.06.2020, when the first informant went to the house of the petitioners to pay the chit amount, the petitioners have abused him by taking the name of his caste, insulted him and also kicked him and threatened him with dire consequences. 69. sections 3(1)(r) and (s) reads as under ; “(r) intentionally insults or intimidates with intent to humiliate a member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe in any place within public view; (s) abuses any member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe by caste name in any place within public view”. reading of the complaint does not indicate that except the first informant, there.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....do have an independent right which they appear to have derived on the basis of the sale deeds executed by the owners of the land. it may be a fact that the sale deeds were executed by the power of attorney holders of the owner, but in reality those sale deeds were executed by the owners of the land and, therefore, it can be said that the nature of declaratory relief granted by the trial court in the suit does not affect the interest of the applicants/appellants.” the trial court further went on to observe that; “if they are in possession of the sites purchased by them, they have to protect their possession by filing independent suits. i do not think they have a remedy by filing an appeal challenging the judgment in the suit”.11. learned counsel for the appellants argues before us that the interest of the appellants is directly involved in the subject matter of the suit. they have become absolute owners of the sites in question on the basis of sale deeds. the judgment of the trial court holding the sale agreements time barred and granting a decree of 5 permanent injunction actually affects their interests as they are in possession of the suit property.12. on the other.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT