.....parties. if at all the petitioner has reason to resile from the settlement on the ground of undue influence, coercion or fraud, this allegation of facts can be adjudicated in the forum of the industrial court where disputed question of facts can be thrashed. the parties are to abide by the terms of the settlement, which is a necessary condition for his reinstatement. therefore, the order impugned dated 21.11.2012, annexure-6, cannot be said to suffer from any illegality or is inequitable either. the petitioner was out of service and therefore, does not deserve to be paid idle wages for the said period. learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of sukra kujur vs. state of bihar & ors. reported in 2006(4) jcr597(jhr.), in the case of saheb singh @ saheb prasad singh vs. the state of jharkhand & ors. reported in 2013 (2) jljr560and in the case of ramesh kumar mandal vs. bccl, dhanbad through its chairman-cum-managing director reported in 2013(2) jljr570 i have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the rival submissions in the factual backdrop of the case noticed hereinabove. the material question involved to consider the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....that no such statement as is seen now brought on record by the prosecution as the impugned first information statement to register the crime was in fact given by him to the police. the first respondent is definite in his version that the crl.m.c no.3200 of 2015 - :2. :- fi statement as such is an act of concoction at the behest of the police and the signature sworn to be affixed in the fi statement as that of the first respondent was not put by him. it is the contention of the petitioner that as per the case projected by the prosecution the incident is said to have occurred on 14.5.2015 at about 8.15 pm. around this time, the first respondent has actually suffered a fracture to his right hand and that it was impossible for him to put his signature on the first information statement said to have been registered on 14.5.2015 at 9.20 pm. that the first respondent has in fact not made any such allegation against the petitioner and that the police in the station house office, harippad is on enimical terms with the petitioner and that they have falsely booked him in many cases and that their intention is to falsely implicate the petitioner in this crime involving offences like the one.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....with the minor children in ernakulam. further the amount ordered to be paid as rent and maintenance has not been paid as well.6. it is an admitted fact that petitioner was a cancer patient and the respondent had married the petitioner after he was cured and thereafter two children were born to them. it is also an admitted fact till 2013, they were living together and the children were with them. thereafter due to matrimonial disputes arose between them, they fell apart o.p (fc) no.196/2015 -5- and the respondent with children were residing in a rented building and several petitions including the petition for divorce and also for custody of the children were filed. g.o.p7222014 is one such petition filed by the petitioner herein for permanent custody of the children. it was fairly conceded by both sides that it was based on an interim arrangement that a rented building will be taken at aluva allowing the respondent to reside with the children and an amount was fixed as rs.7,000/- per month and the petitioner also had undertaken to meet the education expenses of the children in the school, besides the amount of rs.7,000/- agreed to be paid. on that understanding a rented building.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....:mrs.debolina sen irani, jc to ag jc to gp iv for the respondent-income tax department :mr.deepak roshan for the respondent-cbi :mr.k.p.deo ------ dated 22nd june, 2015 the present five public interest litiagations on board stand disposed of in terms of order dated 11 th may, 2015 passed by the coordinate bench of this court while dealing with w.p(pil) no.1635/2014, the issue cropped in the present public interest litiagations being the same and that all the similarly situated criminal cases (first information reports) registered at various other police stations about chitfund companies having been handed over to central bureau of investigation (c.b.i) for further investigation. we hereby make it clear that in the light of the observations made in the aforesaid pil ( w.p(pil) no.1635/2014), the investigation of the f.i.rs being subject matters of these petitions shall also be handed over to c.b.i for further investigation. all the pending interlocutory applications in the present five pils also stand disposed of accordingly. (virender singh, c.j.) (p.p.bhatt, j.) dey
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....:mrs.debolina sen irani, jc to ag jc to gp iv for the respondent-income tax department :mr.deepak roshan for the respondent-cbi :mr.k.p.deo ------ dated 22nd june, 2015 the present five public interest litiagations on board stand disposed of in terms of order dated 11 th may, 2015 passed by the coordinate bench of this court while dealing with w.p(pil) no.1635/2014, the issue cropped in the present public interest litiagations being the same and that all the similarly situated criminal cases (first information reports) registered at various other police stations about chitfund companies having been handed over to central bureau of investigation (c.b.i) for further investigation. we hereby make it clear that in the light of the observations made in the aforesaid pil ( w.p(pil) no.1635/2014), the investigation of the f.i.rs being subject matters of these petitions shall also be handed over to c.b.i for further investigation. all the pending interlocutory applications in the present five pils also stand disposed of accordingly. (virender singh, c.j.) (p.p.bhatt, j.) dey
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....:mrs.debolina sen irani, jc to ag jc to gp iv for the respondent-income tax department :mr.deepak roshan for the respondent-cbi :mr.k.p.deo ------ dated 22nd june, 2015 the present five public interest litiagations on board stand disposed of in terms of order dated 11 th may, 2015 passed by the coordinate bench of this court while dealing with w.p(pil) no.1635/2014, the issue cropped in the present public interest litiagations being the same and that all the similarly situated criminal cases (first information reports) registered at various other police stations about chitfund companies having been handed over to central bureau of investigation (c.b.i) for further investigation. we hereby make it clear that in the light of the observations made in the aforesaid pil ( w.p(pil) no.1635/2014), the investigation of the f.i.rs being subject matters of these petitions shall also be handed over to c.b.i for further investigation. all the pending interlocutory applications in the present five pils also stand disposed of accordingly. (virender singh, c.j.) (p.p.bhatt, j.) dey
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....:mrs.debolina sen irani, jc to ag jc to gp iv for the respondent-income tax department :mr.deepak roshan for the respondent-cbi :mr.k.p.deo ------ dated 22nd june, 2015 the present five public interest litiagations on board stand disposed of in terms of order dated 11 th may, 2015 passed by the coordinate bench of this court while dealing with w.p(pil) no.1635/2014, the issue cropped in the present public interest litiagations being the same and that all the similarly situated criminal cases (first information reports) registered at various other police stations about chitfund companies having been handed over to central bureau of investigation (c.b.i) for further investigation. we hereby make it clear that in the light of the observations made in the aforesaid pil ( w.p(pil) no.1635/2014), the investigation of the f.i.rs being subject matters of these petitions shall also be handed over to c.b.i for further investigation. all the pending interlocutory applications in the present five pils also stand disposed of accordingly. (virender singh, c.j.) (p.p.bhatt, j.) dey
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....be in tune with the physical frame of the victim and his incapacities, disabilities, loss of enjoyment as well as other m.a.c.a.no.2995 of 2008 -7- factors like amount to be spent for his future treatment, which have not been considered in a proper manner. the vehement plea raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that he will require the constant assistance of a bystander and a reasonable amount will have to be fixed accordingly. it is also submitted that for loss of prospects of marriage including disfiguration only rs.10,000/- was granted which requires enhancement properly. it is further highlighted that for pain and suffering undergone by him and which is continuing throughout, a reasonable compensation will have to be granted. coupled with the same, it is submitted that, there is total loss of enjoyment of life and pleasures of life which also require fixation of proper amount. as regards the future treatment also the learned counsel submitted that the court will have to anticipate the difficulties in future and for covering the expenses towards medical expenses, a suitable amount will have to be fixed. the learned counsel for the insurance company submitted that.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....filed an affidavit producing the order appointing him as `peon' in the st.albert's college with effect from 12.06.2015. in the light of the above fact, no further orders are required in this writ petition. this writ petition is accordingly closed. sd/- (p.v.asha, judge) rtr/ w.p(c) no.2848 of 2014-e2p.v.asha, j.----------------------------------------------------- w.p(c) no.2848 of 2014-e ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 22nd day of may, 2015 judgment the petitioner is one of the candidates included in ext.p2 select list for appointment of peons in st.albert's college, ernakulam. the 3rd respondent manager issued ext.p10 notification dated 7.3.2012, inviting applications for appointment to various non teaching posts in the college including that of peon. the qualification and age were stated to be as 'in accordance with the university statutes and government rules'. after conducting a process of selection, ext.p2 select list was published, which contains the names of 12 candidates, for appointment to the post of peon, as against 4 vacancies notified. the name of the petitioner figures at sl.no.6 therein. sl.nos.2 and 4 in the select list are.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....whether the act of the first respondent in refusing to register the document is correct or not.6. at this juncture, it would be appropriate to extract rule 55 which reads as follows: "rule 55. it forms no part of a registering officer's duty to enquire into the validity of a document brought to him for registration or to attend any written or verbal protest against the registration of a document based on the ground that the executing party had no right to execute the document; but he is bound to consider objections raised on any of the grounds stated below:- a) that the parties appearing or about to appear before him are not the persons they profess to be; b) that the document is forged; c) that the person appearing as a representative, assign or agent, has no right to appear in that capacity; d) that the executing party is not legally dead, as alleged by the party applying for registration; and e) that the executing party is a minor or an idiot or a lunatic."7. a close reading of the above said rule shows that the registering authority is bound to consider the objections raised on any of the grounds stated in rule 55 of tamil nadu registration act. so far as the present case.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT