.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 would remain permanently stayed. in default of entire payment in terms of the order of admission and in respect of the claims adjudicated by the order under appeal, the company might be wound up. the surviving winding up petitions i.e.cp no.252 of 2015, cp no.268 of 2014, cp no.531 of 2014 and cp no.203 of 2015 were directed to be listed on 10th september, 2015. as recorded in the order under appeal, the claims were admitted on the basis of a tentative calculation prepared by the appellant company. this tentative calculation was disputed by the appellant company before the learned company court on the contention that reimbursement of medical expenses, leave travel allowance etc.was subject to verification upon furnishing of documents and variable pay was not payable to employees serving the appellant company for less than five years.the learned company court rejected the contentions of the company inter alia holding that the company could not demonstrate that the balance variable component was not part of the salary of the employee, and rightly so. the tentative calculations in respect of reimbursement of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....following prayers: "i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the 1st respondent to comply with the orders of ombudsman and take immediate action to remove the unauthorized and illegal constructions made by the 4th respondent by encroaching the panchayath road/pathway with immediate effect. ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to take further action against the secretary of the 1st respondent for not complying the orders and submit a report to that effect before this court. iii. issue such other writ or order or direction as this honourable court may be fit in the circumstances of the case." 2. the allegation of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent has constructed a boundary wall encroaching into the panchayath road, thereby reducing the width and obstructing wpc.no.27259/13 2 the road. it is stated that even though exhibit p3 order was issued by the ombudsman for the local self government institutions and exhibits p4 and p5 reports were filed by the revenue authorities, no action was taken to demolish the encroached portion of the compound wall in.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....concerned through a resolution without any approval from the members of the panchayat and through a resolution, it is trying to do the developmental activities, which is violative of the provisions of the tamil nadu panchayat act. though as many as 24 items were listed out in the tender notification, the irregularities are apparent on the face of the record in respect of item nos.3,9,11 to 13, and therefore, the petitioner sent a representation to the district collector. however, the inspector of panchayat who is the custodian of the panchayat seldom takes action against the panchayat concerned. in support of her contention, the petitioner has produced number of photographs to substantiate her claim.6. the learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that the allegations against the panchayat are frivolous in nature. the panchayat started carrying out the welfare activities after a resolution was passed by its members. further, wherever the roads are not in good condition or if it is in a battered condition, the respondents are carrying out their work. the tender notification was properly put on notice and wide publicity was given through local dailies as well as district.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....earlier moved this hon'ble court for grant of anticipatory bail in a.b.a. no. 802 of 2012, which was however, dismissed as withdrawn in view of the fact that no material was found against the petitioner to prosecute him. it has further been submitted that in view of the changed circumstances and warrant of arrest having been issued against the petitioner pursuant to a new investigating officer taking charge of the investigation, the petitioner has been constrained to move this hon'ble court for grant of anticipatory bail. it has also been submitted that the basis for initiation of the case is an order passed in cwjc no. 1140 of 2001 but the same does not relate to illegal transfer, promotion of teachers and it is only related to the transfer of the then district superintendent of education-smt. punam singh. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner from the office of lokayukt, to which the petitioner had duly given a reply and upon consideration -2- of the same, an order was passed on 25.01.1995 to the effect that the entire proceeding was closed on the ground that there was no positive evidence with respect to the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for reason of the change in the date of birth as asserted in the application.4. the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact the petitioner could have suppressed the details and it was only on the bonafide act on the part of the petitioner, for having produced a birth certificate and the correction made subsequently in tune with the birth certificate, that the petitioner has now been found ineligible for the post.5. i have heard the learned standing counsel appearing for w.p(c). no.21260 of 2015 3 the first respondent as also the second respondent. the learned standing counsel refer to the notification issued by the ibps for the common recruitment process, to the clerical cadre of the participating organisation. it is pointed out that, every state has a nodal agency and according to the preference of the candidate, the selected candidate is advised to a particular state, each of which state has a nodal bank for processing the applications. the provisional verification is done by the nodal bank and on the same being transmitted to the ibps, the ibps allots each candidates to the banks in a state, according to the preference of the candidate as also the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT