.....the act, for brevity) will not come in the way of elected councillors for moving a fresh motion of no-confidence motion against smt.shahjaha. 3. the facts leading to the filing of the writ petitions before the learned single judge and consequently the writ appeals are as follows: ƒ a) the city of basavakalyan in bidar district has a population of not less than 50,000 and below 1,00,000. therefore the number of councillors to be elected from the different wards of the city, as per the table appended to section 11 of the act, is 31. b) a member of legislative assembly (mla, for short) of basavakalyan constituency and a member of parliament (mp, for short) of bidar constituency are ex-officio councillors of the city municipal council, basavakalyan. c) the 1st respondent-smt.shahjaha was elected as president of the council in the election held on 26.03.2014. later on 8.02.2015, 12 members of the council bad brought a no-confidence motion against smt-shahjaha and since it satisfied all the legal requirements, the commissioner of city municipal council, basavakalyan convened a special general body meeting on 28.01.2015 for carrying out no- confidence. ƒ d) all the 33.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....(ii) it is alleged that on 23.04.2009 at about 12.10 a.m., the deceased, his wife, p.w.1, p.w.2 and p.w.3 were in the village. as a matter of fact, on the pial of the house of the deceased, the deceased was talking to the above witnesses. at that time, it is alleged that the accused came to the spot and questioned the deceased as to why he did not disconnect his illicit relationship with his wife. this resulted in a quarrel. in the said quarrel, it is alleged that the accused took out a wooden log and attacked the deceased with the same repeatedly. the deceased sustained serious injuries and fell unconscious. the accused ran away from the scene of occurrence with the weapon. (iii) p.w.2 immediately took the deceased to the government hospital at sankarankovil. p.w.8, dr.jeyakumar, examined him at 12.40 a.m. on 14.04.2009. at the time of examination, he found that there was smell of arrack from the breath of the deceased. he found the following injuries: (i) a lacerated injury measuring 15 cm x 3 cm x bone deep in the right side of frontal region of scalp. (ii) a lacerated injury measuring 2 cm x cm x cm on the right eyebrow. (iii) a lacerated injury measuring 1 cm x cm x.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTjayant nath, j. 1. the present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the order dated 28.08.2014 passed by the learned single judge. 2. the brief facts which led to filing of the present appeal are that the appellant floated a scheme to provide functional and economical residence to the workers in the industrial areas, known as rajiv gandhi housing project self finance cost effective workers housing scheme ?. the scheme was launched in view of certain orders passed by the supreme court directing closure of the industrial units operating in nonconforming/residential areas and directing the government of nct of delhi to relocate the said industries to dedicated industrial areas. the appellant was made the implementing agency for the relocation scheme. 3. as per the relevant eligibility criteria specified in the scheme, the applicant should be a bona fide allottee of the relocation scheme in the bawana and narela industrial area. 4. the respondent shri harpal singh was a partner of m/s hemkunt industries, an allottee of an industrial plot. shri savinder singh was the other partner. it is contended by the appellant that as per the eligibility criteria, only one application could be made by.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....an application is made under this section for the registration of the title of any person the controller shall, upon proof to title of his satisfaction, ” (a) where that person is entitled to a patent or a share in a patent, register him in the register as proprietor or co-proprietor of the patent, and enter in the register particulars of the instrument or even by which he derives title; or (b) where that person is entitled to any other interest in the patent, enter in the register notice of his interest, with particulars of the instrument, if any, creating it: provided that if there is any dispute between the parties whether the assignment, mortgage, licence, transmission, operation of law or any other such transaction has validly vested in such person a title to the patent or any share or interest therein, the controller may refuse to take any action under clause (a) or, as the case may be, under clause (b), until the rights of the parties have been determined by a competent court. (4) there shall be supplied to the controller in the prescribed manner for being filed in the patent office copies of all agreements, licences and other documents affecting the title to.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....assistant director, department of income tax rejecting the objections. being aggrieved thereby, the present writ petitions have been filed. 2. the facts and circumstances are virtually identical in respect of both the assessment years and, therefore, we shall be referring to the facts of the assessment year 2002-03. in respect of this year, the original assessment under section 143(3) was completed on 28.03.2005. more than 4 years from the end of the said assessment year, the impugned notice under section 148 of the said act was issued on 10.12.2008. pursuant to the reasons having been furnished, the petitioner/assessee submitted its objections to the reopening of assessment on 31.08.2009 which, as indicated above, has been rejected by virtue of the impugned order dated 11.09.2009. the learned counsel for the petitioner/assessee submitted that the impugned notices and the orders rejecting the objections are liable to be set aside, primarily on two grounds. first of all, it is contended that there has been a change of opinion and, secondly, it has been contended that the pre-conditions as stipulated in the first proviso under section 147 have not been satisfied. particularly,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....surrender on the same day in crime no.541 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for the offences under sections 341, 323, 355, 294(b) ipc and section 3(1)(x) sc/st act, 1989.) 1. heard both sides. 2. the petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 355, 294(b) ipc and section 3(1)(x) sc/st act, 1989 in crime no.541 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned district and sessions judge (pcr court), theni, theni district, to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider his bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to crime no.541 of 2015. 3. perused the records. 4. the learned government advocate (crl. side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5. the offences complained of, other than the offence under the special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detention in jail, even before considering the bail application. 6. therefore, the learned district and sessions judge (pcr court), theni, theni district, is directed to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider his bail application on the very same.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the rpf; they did so. however, the rpf did not give any response. in the meanwhile, the petitioners retired. 5. p.l. verma's petition refers to the fact that after the judgment of the supreme court, dated 27th august, 1997, a seniority list was issued on 28.08.1998. this did not reflect the correct seniority, by giving weightage to military service. it is submitted that the petitionersentry into rpf under the emergency service rules cannot be disputed, because of the nature of recruitment rules and the fact that their names were present in the list forwarded to the union public service commission. the letters written by the rpf to the upsc and the replies thereto are relied upon to say that there were vacancies that were in fact filled up from amongst eligible candidates who had undergone military service. reliance is placed on certain documents, sourced through the right to information act, 2005 (rti) including file notings, to contend that the petitionersclaim for seniority is justified and that the rpf had in fact no opposition to it. it is also contended that the rpf fixed pay taking due note of the eco rules and gave benefit of past military service. consequently, it was.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and rs.84,21,500/- and also hdeclaration forms along with other documents for a turnover of rs.3,72,56,831/- and rs.1,91,63,486. this fact has been reiterated by the petitioner vide its letters dated 14.07.2015 and 15.07.2015 addressed to the 2nd respondent. thereafter, the impugned endorsements came to be passed rejecting the request of the petitioner for re-consideration of assessment orders on the ground that the reasons stated by the petitioner were not convincing. 3. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader for commercial taxes. 4. it is not being disputed that this court in the case of godrej agrovet ltd., china pothapally and another v. commercial tax officer, eluru, and another (41 apstj 92), held that c-forms and f-forms filed even after passing of the assessment order, deserves to be considered. the necessity of c-forms is only to buttress the argument of the dealer that, as a matter of fact, the goods have moved from one state to another state pursuant to a sale and, as such, they are required to be taxed at a lesser rate under the cst act. providing of c-forms is a confirmation from the dealer of the other state that.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. since the respondents have not disposed of the complaint within the stipulated time as fixed by this court, the act of the respondents will amount to willful disobedience of the court order and hence the petitioner is before this court. 2. today, the contemnor is present and submits that on receipt of the order from this court, the records have been perused. the revenue records would show that the land belongs to a temple. he further submits that 'a' register stated that the particular land was shown as "temple poromboke" and the petitioner is not the owner of the property, because in the order itself this court specifically directed the respondents to look into the complaint of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. after receipt of the contempt notice he has sent a reply dated 11.09.2015 in that it was stated that the action has been taken. in such circumstances, i do not find any elements of contempt and hence the contempt petition is closed.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....incident to p.w.1. but however, he has resiled from his earlier statement and hence he was declared as hostile by the prosecution. but however, the fact remains that it is p.w.3, who informed p.w.1 over telephone about the incident of burning of the deceased. p.w.4, who is the cousin of the deceased, stated that he came to know about the incident after an hour's time and that he went to the house of the deceased and shifted her to the hospitalin 108 ambulance. in so far as the rest of the statement is concerned, since he resiled from his earlier statement, he was declared hostile. p.w.5 has made a statement that she does not know how the deceased has received burn injuries. she was declared to have turned hostile by the prosecution. but however, p.w.5 made the following statement, which has some significance. the accused and deceased were staying in their house . ? p.w.6 has deposed that after the incident all the thanda people gathered near the house of the deceased and that is how she also went there and saw the deceased in flames. with regard to the rest of the particulars, since this witness has resiled from the earlier statement, she was declared as hostile by the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT