.....of the loan agreements. seil also made a claim for costs. the society/guarantors contested the aforesaid claims on several fronts. the relevant facts and defence set up by the society/guarantors before the arbitral tribunal are summarized as under: it was the case of the society/guarantors before the arbitral tribunal 8.1 that in the year 2011-12, the society was in desperate need for funds for o.m.p. (comm.) 194/2017& other connected matters page 8 of 33 the purposes of furthering its philanthropic goals including establishment of the galgotias university which was at its "nascent stage". the society also needed funds for institutions viz. galgotias college of engineering and technology, galgotia institute of management school. accordingly, the society had entered into loan agreements (ten in number) on various dates for availing loans aggregating ₹37,60,00,000/-. financing other educational and galgotias business and technology it is stated that the society had also given a sum of ₹2.75 crores 8.2 towards security deposit. however, seil claims that a sum of ₹2.45 crores had been paid as consideration for a separate transaction for providing consultancy services. and.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in order to teach a lesson to the appellant for his drinking so excessively.6. dr.rajesh (pw-9), the chief medical officer has testified to the fact that pw-1 was having superficial burn injuries on forearm, hand, left side abdomen, left thigh and neck. he has deposed that blisters were found on the person of pw-1. he has proved the mlc prepared by him (exh.pw-9/a) and has also proved the clothes and garments which were worn by the injured and which were collected by the police.7. smt.kavita goel, senior scientific officer, fsl (pw-5) has crl.a.71/2015 page 2 of 6 proved her report regarding partial burnt clothes (exh.pw-5/a).8. the prosecution version further finds support from the deposition of zile singh (pw-2) who is the father of pw-1, who had reached the place of occurrence on that day. in his deposition, pw-2 has categorically stated that the appellant is a habitual drunkard and often quarrelled with pw-1.9. head constable rajender kumar and constable ashish attri, pws.3 & 4 respectively have also supported the prosecution version.10. si vijay singh (pw-10) is the investigating officer who has given the narration about the events and has completely denied the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....respondent was granted anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1,00,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of investigating officer/arresting officer/sho concerned by the coordinate bench of this court. it is relevant to note that the said order was passed after hearing the counsel for the complainant.3. state has not filed any application for seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail. the present petition has been filed by the complainant informing that pursuant to the anticipatory bail granted by this court, the respondent has not appeared before the trial court. copy of the order dated 8.10.2016 of the learned metropolitan magistrate reflects that respondent’s counsel had put appearance before the trial court. it was observed therein that technically, the respondent had submitted to the jurisdiction of the court by putting appearance through his counsel. proceedings under section 83 cr.p.c. initiated against him were dropped.4. if the respondent violates the terms and conditions of the order and fails to appear before the trial court without valid reasons despite issuance of process by the court below, coercive process.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the fir in question w.p (crl) 1115/2017 page1 of 7 by the advocate for respondent no.2.3. the factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant has alleged that from her facebook id and using her profile picture and name, three fake i.d’s have been made whereby her friends and relatives were added via sending friend requests and thereafter vulgar and lewd messages and talks were carried out through those i.d’s. the complainant has alleged immense mental agony due to the above activities of the petitioner due to which she also had to take leave from her work. thereafter, accused/petitioner by the complainant/respondent no.2. the fir in question was registered against the 4. respondent no.2 present in the court submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled and now no dispute survives between them. respondent no.2 affirmed the contents of the aforesaid settlement. all the disputes and differences have been resolved through mutual consent upon the intervention of the respective family members of both parties. now no dispute with petitioners survives and so, the proceedings arising out of the fir in.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of the suit property to the respondent/plaintiff being a portion of quarter no.23/60, east mehram nagar, delhi cantt., delhi-110010.4. the facts of the case are that the suit property was allotted to the grandfather sh. bhagmal of the respondent/plaintiff. after the death of sh. bhagmal, the suit property devolved upon the father of the respondent/plaintiff late sh. nanwa ram and after the death of sh. nanwa ram the suit property devolved upon the respondent/plaintiff. the appellants/defendants were inducted in the suit property as gratuitous licensees by the father of the respondent/plaintiff. appellants/defendants never paid any rent or any water charges or electricity charges. when the appellants/defendants in spite of various requests refused to hand over possession, then, the respondent/plaintiff served the legal notice dated 28.5.2013, and thereafter filed the subject suit. the appellants/defendants prayed for the suit to be dismissed and raised various objections of suit not having a cause of action and that there was non-joinder of necessary parties, and the suit being barred by limitation. the appellants/defendants did not dispute that suit property was.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....to be rejected in its entirety as it entails appointment of serving officers of rvnl/railways as arbitrators.3. briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary to address the controversy are as under :3. 1 afcons is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of undertaking large infrastructure projects, including construction of roads, bridges, jetties, railway lines, tunnels etc. rvnl is a government of india undertaking created to undertake projects pertaining to strengthening of golden quadrilateral and port connectivity. rvnl issued a notice inviting tender dated 27.06.2013, inviting bids from interested parties for the work of “construction of viaduct including related works for 5.16 km length excluding station areas from ch. 12570.00 to ch. 18630.00 between nicco park to cbd- 1, in new garia- airport corridor of kolkata metro railway line” (hereafter „the works‟). afcons‟ bid, submitted pursuant to the notice inviting tender, was accepted and a letter of award dated 21.10.2011 (hereafter „the loa‟) in respect of the works for a total consolidated value of ₹2,12,54,73,130/-, was issued in favour of afcons......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....officer who recorded the statement of pw-7, are minor in nature and do not go to the root of the matter. further, this court is not oblivious of the fact that the testimony of pw-7 was recorded almost 2 years after the date of the incident; and the testimonies of pw-28 and pw-29 were recorded almost 07 years after the date of the incident, and therefore, the same are prone to such minor inconsistencies.38. in view thereof, the argument sought to be advanced by the appellant that pw-7 is a planted witness, inasmuch as, there are crl.a.52/2016 page 15 of 26 contradictions in the testimonies of pw-7, pw-28 and pw-29 as regards the circumstance in which the statement of pw-7 was recorded by the police team, is untenable.39. the court in ghanshyam prasad yadav v. state (supra) placed reliance on the principles enunciated by the hon’ble supreme court with regard to extra judicial confessions in sahadevan v. state of tamil nadu, reported as 2012 (5) scale415 the principles enunciated are reproduced hereinbelow: it if “(i) the extra judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself. it has to be examined by the court with greater care and caution. (ii) it should be made voluntarily.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....trial court judgment read as under:-"“24. i have duly considered the law laid down in the aforesaid judgments and if, the same is applied to the facts of the present case then it would be evident that the place of alleged incident i.e. the tenanted house of accused was situated at the first floor of the crl. l.p. no.339/2017 page 3 of 12 building where there were other tenants in other rooms and at the ground floor there was a meat shop of dw-2 mohd. ajmal but none of them saw either going or coming out from the house of accused on the said date. it is also evident that pw-8 had gone to the house of accused at about 9 p.m. on 12.12.2013 itself but the accused could not be found there. there is nothing on record that from 12.12.2013 till 15.12.2013 whether pw-8 or her husband had again gone to the house of accused. it is also not clear as to how all of a sudden on 15.12.2013 the father of n had made up his mind to report the matter to the police. therefore, possibility of a coloured version having come on record cannot be ruled out on account of the aforesaid unexplained delay in reporting the matter to the police.25. the medical and forensic evidence does not support the case.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....court has been learned additional public prosecutor for crl.m.c. 2060/2017 page1 of 7 identified to be the complainant in the fir in question.3. the factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant alleged dispute with his neighbor over parking issue since the past 15- 20 days. on 16.01.2013 the complainant was standing in front of his house when suddenly the petitioner along with some of his friends reached there and made the complainant to fall and started beating him up. on seeing this, the neighbor of the complainant, harish tried to save him but he was also given beatings by the aforesaid persons as a result of which harish sustained multiple injuries. thereafter, the wife and brother of the complainant (respondent no 4 and 3 respectively) also came out and the said persons made them to fall down too and gave them beatings. the petitioner hurled abuses at the complainant’s wife and daughter and intercepted their way when they tried to escape. the complainant after the above incident got registered the fir in the present matter.... respondents no.2-7 present in the court submitted that the 4. dispute between the parties has been now resolved with the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....2014 and notification dated 13.01.2017 for giving relaxation of 5 years in upper age limit and has also prayed for stay of the said advertisement. factual matrix 3. the respondent no. 4 published an advertisement on its website on 24.04.2017 in the name of intermediate level (for computer knolwedge and hindi typing posts) combined competitive examination, 2017, by which the applications were invited from the eligible candidates for appointment on the post of panchayat sewaks in gram panchayats of different district of jharkhand. the last date for submission of preliminary information has been fixed as 09.06.2017 and the last date for submission of the application form has been fixed as 15.06.2017 and it has been mentioned in the advertisement that only those candidates are eligible for submitting the application pursuant to the advertisement, who are below the upper age limit i.e. in case of petitioners 37 years. as the petitioners are above 37 years, their cases are not being considered and application forms are not entertained, this writ application has been preferred challenging the advertisement.4. mr. sameer saurav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner strenuously.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT