.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....hussain & others (supra) by the learned division bench has not taken note of the view rendered in the case of bimal kumar sinha(supra) on similar facts. it is further submitted that in the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners passed by the learned single judge, there is no discussion on the import of clause-11 and 12 of the absorption notification dated 30.5.2007. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the claim for pensionary / death cum retirement benefits cannot be denied by refusing to reckon their past services as spent under the adult cum non formal education project. the aforesaid condition in the absorption notification at clause 11 and 12 therefore is contrary to the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases and petitioners are also entitle to derive advantage of pensionary benefits. having taken note of the aforesaid contention of the parties, it appears that the matter requires hearing by the learned division bench of this court as 14 there are divergent views expressed in one or the other case such as in l.p.a. no. 188 of 2004 in the case of state of jharkhand & others vrs. bimal kumar sinha on the one hand and on the other hand.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT