.....prosecution is that on 16th february, 1999 si udham singh of ps dabri received a secret information that counterfeit coins of ₹5/- were being manufactured by someone in a house in indira park colony. si udham singh constituted a raiding party and reached house no.235, gali no.3, crl.a. no.651/2001 page 1 of 4 indira park alongwith informer. the door of the house was found bolted from inside. he knocked the door and one person namely sukhbir sharma opened the door. on seeing the police party, that person became perplexed. police informed him about the secret information and took his personal search during which ten fake coins of ₹5/- were recovered from the pocket of his pant. while accused sukhbir sharma was being searched, co-accused om prakash singh i.e. the appellant herein came out of the inner room of the house and he was apprehended. thereafter search of house was also taken and machinery and other articles for making fake coins were found lying there which were seized. both the accused persons were arrested and on the basis of their disclosure statement, the third accused namely ram pratap chauhan was arrested from his village navli, mathura, u.p.3. accused ram pratap.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....rs.13,670/- rounded off to rs.15,000/-. thus, the amount of rs.15,000/- is awarded towards loss of income during treatment.6. having regard to the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the award of rs.6,000/- each under the heads of special diet and conveyance and rs.30,000/- under the head of pain and suffering are added, the sum awarded as just compensation in the present case being (16,285/- + 15,000/- + 6,000/- + 6,000/- + 30,000/-) rs.73,285/- rounded off to rs.75,000/-.7. the award is modified accordingly. mac appeal no.60/2017 page 3 of 4 8. the amount of rs.75,000/- will be paid as compensation to the first respondent with interest @ nine per cent (9%) per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.9. in terms of order dated 17.01.2017, the appellant has deposited the entire awarded amount with interest with the tribunal. the tribunal shall re-calculate the award as per modification above, releasing the same in favour of the first respondent (the claimant), refunding the excess to the appellant insurance company with statutory amount.10. the appeal as well as pending application are disposed of in above terms. august09 2017 vk r.k.gauba, j.mac.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....at the time of making the order for payment of the compensation. relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereunder: as the above facts are not disputed by “12. the railway administration the appellant was relieved of the burden to prove those facts averred in her claim petition. thus, the only question which remained for the claims tribunal to decide was regarding the amount of compensation payable to her. now the only question remaining is whether the high court was so helpless that learned judges could not confirm the amount awarded to her by the claims tribunal. xxx xxx xxx the liability of the railway administration in such a case 16. would be to pay compensation, but the extent of such compensation is as may be prescribed which means prescribed by the rules made under the act. section 129 of the act empowered the central government to make such rules.17. the railway accident compensation rules 1990 (for short the rules) were made by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 129 of the act. rule 3(1) says that the amount of compensation payable in respect of death or injuries shall be as specified in the schedule. the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by her counsel.2. the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution of india read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short ‘cr.pc’) for quashing of the fir bearing no.1020 of 2015 registered on the complaint of respondent no.2 on 02.08.2015 with police station mukherji nagar, delhi, under sections 498a/406 ipc.3. the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent no.2 was solemnized on 08.02.2011 as per hindu rites and ceremonies. w.p. (crl.) 2206/2017 page 1 of 3 however, out of this wedlock, no child was born.4. after solemnization of their marriage, the petitioner and the respondent no.2 started residing with each other in the matrimonial home. due to some temperamental differences between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 they could not reconcile with each other. resultantly, the respondent no.2 left the matrimonial home and started living with her parents.5. the respondent no.2 lodged a complaint with caw cell, which culminated into the said fir against the petitioner.6. learned asc through the io submits that the charge sheet in the matter has so far not been filed.7. the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by the petitioner; rather declined to grant any maintenance to the petitioner on the ground that she was earlier married to one noor mohd, which fact was never disclosed and that there was nothing on record to suggest that the aforesaid earlier marriage of the petitioner had been dissolved. as such, the appellate court directed the respondent to pay only an crl.rev.p.380/2016 page 3 of 6 amount of rs.5000/- towards the maintenance of the daughter of the petitioner i.e. rs.5000/- per month from the date of the filing of the complaint.8. the only reason assigned by the appellate court for not granting maintenance to the petitioner is that the petitioner had married one noor mohd. prior to her marriage with the respondent.9. the provisions of the act are for the benefit of persons in distress as well as for vindication of the rights of the aggrieved person which is guaranteed under articles 14, 15 & 21 of the constitution of india and for providing civil remedies for the purposes of protecting women from being victims of domestic violence and to prevent the occurrence of such domestic violence in society.10. section 2(a) of the protection of woman from domestic violence act,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....consisting of rfa no.705/2017 page 1 of 13 ground floor, tin shed with pillars situated at batla house, jamia nagar, okhla, new delhi-110025.3. the facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit for possession, mesne profits, etc. with respect to the suit property pleading that the suit property was purchased by her from the previous owner, sh. jameel ahmed by means of the usual documentation being the agreement to sell, power of attorney, will, receipt, etc. dated 13.6.2011 for a consideration of rs.17,00,000/-. it was further pleaded that the respondent/plaintiff has with her the complete chain of ownership documents with respect to the suit property. it was further pleaded in the plaint that the husband of the appellant/defendant, who is the brother-in-law of the previous owner sh. jameel ahmed, had come to delhi from mumbai in the year 2004 for getting medical treatment and since he had no suitable residence sh. jameel ahmed had allowed the husband of the appellant/defendant mohd. saleem to take temporary shelter in the suit property. it was further pleaded in the suit that mohd. saleem had fraudulently got electricity connection in the suit.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....brought so. consequently the respondent had withdrawn the petition filed by the r.p. no.364/2016 in rfa no.163/1986 4 of 15 respondent. however, the fact remained that the tenanted premises has been brought within the ambit of delhi rent control act, 1958.” having perused the impugned order, we are satisfied that the purely legal position raised in ground `f' in slp(c) no.13229 of 2016, has not been examined by the high court. in the above view of the matter, we consider it just and appropriate to allow the petitioners to file a review petition before the high court solely based on the legal position emanating out of ground `f', extracted above. in case the petitioners do not succeed in the review petition filed by them before the high court, they shall have the liberty to approach this court against the order passed on review. needless to mention, that the high court should not feel that this court, through the instant order, has expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. the special leave petitions stand disposed of in the manner indicated above.” 5. in terms of the order of the hon‟ble supreme court therefore this court has to examine the regular first.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....calculating the compensation committed another error by making deduction to the extent of fifty per cent (50%) on account of personal and living expenses which, in a case under section 163-a of the motor vehicles act, could have been only to the extent of one-third. it is also noted that the proper multiplier as per second schedule appended to the motor vehicles act in the case in hand would have been 16 rather than 15 as invoked by the tribunal. thus, properly calculated, loss of dependency would work out to (3633 x x 12 x16) rs.4,65,024/-.5. adding other components of non-pecuniary heads, the award made by the tribunal is very marginally on the higher side. in this view, this court would refrain from making any interference in the impugned award, particularly as amount of compensation with interest which was deposited by the insurance company in terms of the earlier interim orders was released, with detailed directions, by order dated 23.12.2009 and has already reached the hands of the claimants.6. 7. the appeal is dismissed. statutory amount shall be refunded to the appellant. r.k.gauba, j.august09 2017 vk mac appeal no.481/209 page 2 of 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and loss of consortium, rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses and rs.10,000/- on account of loss of estate are inadequate. having regard to the fact that the accident had occurred on 16.08.2012, following the dispensation in mac appeal no.769/2015 & 773/2015 page 4 of 6 mac.app.no.160/2015 mac.app. 160/2015 shriram general insurance co ltd v. usha decided by this court on 05.05.2016, non- pecuniary damages in the sum of rs.1,50,000/- each towards loss of love & affection and towards loss of consortium and rs.50,000/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expense are added.10. thus, the total compensation payable in the case of death of mahboob is computed as (6,12,000/- + 4,00,000/-) rs.10,12,000/- which amount shall carry interest as levied by the tribunal. the award is modified accordingly, there being no change in the apportionment.11. in the case of injuries suffered by khursed @ jinda hasan, noticeably, the tribunal calculated his functional disability to be to the extent of twelve per cent (12%), the income having been assessed notionally at rs.4527.59, the multiplier of 15 having been adopted, keeping in view his age. the loss of future income due to disability is,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....close the respondents‘ right to file counter affidavit in w.p.(c) 11426/2016. we also notice that limited issue arises for consideration and the facts stated by the petitioner are not disputed.3. as similar, if not identical legal issue arises for consideration, we are disposing of these writ petitions by a common order.4. the petitioners herein had applied for appointment to the post of sub-inspector (general duty) (si/gd) in the limited departmental competitive examination (ldce) for the years 2012, 2013 and 2014. they were permitted to appear in the written examination but later on treated as disqualified for the reasons indicated below. ― s. no.particulars rank/name period of absence penalty year ldce of 1 w.p.( c) ct/gd ashok kumar 7591/2016 warning 2013 03.10.2006 to 01.11.2006 (29 days) w.p.(c) ct/gd jitendra kumar 09.08.2006( nil 2014 one day) 06.10.2008 to 31.10.2008 (26 days) 18.04.2007 to 20.05.2007 2013 15 days confinement to lines and 2hrs pack drill nil 2012 2 3 7986/2016 w.p.(c) 9973/2016 ct/gd swamy ghanshyam 4 w.p.(c) ct/gd babu lal 10656/2016 w.p. (c) 9973/2016+connected page 3 of 15 ( 15 days) 5 w.p.(c) 11426/2016 hc/gd kumar sharma praveen 16.06.2012 to.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT