.....notice of the io of the number of offending vehicle i.e. dl-7-ce-9502, chevrolet (white colour) and he immediately issued the notice u/s 133 of m.v act to the registered owner of the said vehicle who is r-2 herein and father of the r-1, who has stated in the reply of the said notice that the son anuj bedi was having the vehicle on the said date and thereafter, r-1 was interrogated and was arrested on 21.03.2012 in this case fir on the identification of eye witness pw-2 mukesh kashyap and mechanical inspection of the vehicle was carried out and it was found that left light of the offending vehicle was damaged and was repaired recently with white colour.20. it has also been stated that as per the documents, supplied by r-1 before the court were scrutinized and the register ( security guard and receptionist) maintained at the office of kochcar & company gurgaon, haryana revealed that the said register was non paginated and not duly signed by any authorized signatory at any stage. even the entries of register have been found to be bearing blank rows and repeated numbering and the same has been done with alterier motive. the io of the case has also tried to collect the cctv footage.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....years from the year of admission in the first semester. specifically, clause 2 of ordinance (viii) applicable to the university may be reproduced thus : “(2) subject to the provisions of sub-clause (1) above, no person shall be admitted as a candidate for the examinations noted below after the lapse of period specified against each examination: b.a. (pass) part iii years six after admission to the first year class and five years after admission to the ii year class. b.com.(pass) part iii -do- b. sc. (general) part iii b. sc. (hons.) part iii b.sc. (hons.) home science b. sc. (home science) years six after admission to the i year class and five years after admission to the ii year class. years five after admission to the i year class and four years after admission to the ii year class. years five after admission to the i year class. years six after admission to the 1 year class. b.a.(hons.)/b.com. five years after w.p.(c) 12944/2018 page 2 of 4 (hons.) part iii admission to the 1 year class and four years after admission to the ii year class. b.a.(hons.) music -do- years after seven admission to the i year of the course. bachelor of fine arts (painting) bachelor of fine arts.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....analysis and reasoning. however, we are of opinion that it is also necessary to state additional reasons while recording the same conclusions.3. the facts are not elaborately discussed; the present suit (out of which this reference arose) was filed, complaining of infringement of a registered design as well as passing off (of the plaintiff‟s trade dress) in respect of the bottle and overall get up of the “carslberg” mark. the defendant objected to the frame of the suit, pointing out that per mohan lal (supra), the two claims cs (comm) 690/2018 page 2 of 67 (for passing off and reliefs regarding design infringement) could not be combined in one suit. the single judge analysed parties‟ submissions and felt that the issue decided in mohan lal (supra) required a second look; he therefore, referred the matter for appropriate orders to the chief justice. this special bench was constituted, resultantly.4. mohan lal (supra) decided, principally the question whether a passing off remedy is maintainable in the context of a complaint for infringement of copyright in the design (hereafter for clarity referred to as “design right” and “design infringement” to avoid confusion.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the private unaided recognized schools in delhi; (vi) any other order or relief(s) which this hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case may also be passed or awarded in favour of the petitioners and against the respondents, in the interest of justice. w.p.(c) no.13524/2018 page 3 of 6 2. in effect, the petitioner is challenging the circular dated july 27, 2018, whereby the respondents have decided to fill all such vacancies / seats available under freeship quota and also ews / dg category through computerized draw of lots after inviting online applications for admission in class 2 onwards in private / unaided recognized schools running on the government land / dda as was being done in case of admissions at the entry level classes.3. learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondents have not put in place the mechanism for online admission. that apart, it is his submission that the online admission process shall result in many seats going waste.4. mr. ramesh singh, who appeared for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 3, on advance notice, states that this issue is no more res- integra in view of the judgment of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....dispose of the application moved on behalf of the appellant nos. 1 a to c seeking modification of order dated 18.07.2018 passed by this court.2. the facts giving rise to filing of the present application is that an application being c.m.no.36586/2017 was filed by the appellants before this court seeking stay of final judgment and decree dated 17.07.2017 passed by cm appl.47168/2018 in rfa8572017 page 1 of 5 the learned additional district judge - 01, patiala house courts in c.s. no.58159/2016. vide order dated 23.11.2017, the application being c.m.no.36586/2017 was disposed of by this court with the following directions: “c.m.no.36586/2017 1. subject to the appellant’s depositing 50% of the decreetal amount with up-to-date interest with the registry of the court within 8 weeks, there shall be stay of the execution of the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.07.2017. this is subject to further condition that the appellant shall deposit monthly use and occupation charges at the rate of rs.7.5 lacs per month till the final disposal of the appeal. it is further directed that appellant shall not create any third party interest in the property in question during the pendency of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on:25. 10.2018 pronounced on:14. 12.2018 versus ........ petitioner all india drug action network union of india and anr. versus ........ respondents neon laboratories ltd. union of india and ors. + w.p.(c) 8555/2018, c.m. appl.32864/2018 & 34112/2018 + w.p.(c) 8666/2018, c.m. appl.33281/2018 + w.p.(c) 9601/2018, c.m. appl.37387/2018 & 37388/2018 ciron drugs and pharmaceuticals pvt. ltd. and anr. union of india and ors. ........ petitioner versus ......... respondents ......... respondents ........ petitioner through : sh. c.s. vaidianathan, sr. advocate with sh. jayant bhushan, sr. advocate, ms. gayatri roy, ms. soumili das, sh. anirudh and sh. amit panigrahi, advocates, for petitioners, in w.p.(c) 6084/2018. sh. colin gonsalves, sr. advocate with ms. olivia a.i. bay, sh. deepak kumar singh and ms. harini raghupathy, advocates, for petitioner, in w.p.(c) 8555/2018. sh. sandeep sethi, sr. advocate with sh. ravikesh kumar sinha, advocate, for petitioner, in w.p.(c) 8666/2018. sh. tushar mehta, sg with mrs. maninder acharya, asg; sh. kirtiman singh, cgsc; sh. ripu daman bhardwaj, cgsc; sh. rishikant singh, sh. waize ali noor, sh......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in pankaj dixit & ors. v. m/s. k.b.s.h. export house & anr., 248 (2018) dlt357 it is also submitted that workman had not worked for 240 days and infact she had worked for 221 days and that workman’s attendance in two branches of the bank cannot be clubbed together and to submit so, reliance is placed upon decision in haryana state cooperative supply marketing federation limited v. sanjay, (2009) 14 scc43 thus, it is submitted that the workman is not entitled to reinstatement and her petition deserves to be dismissed.4. on the contrary, learned counsel for the workman submits that since the bank had not produced the record and so, adverse inference has been rightly drawn by the tribunal against the bank. it is submitted on w.p.(c) 998/2015 & 9788/2015 page 2 of 5 behalf of workman that the bank has failed to prove that the workman was gainfully employed elsewhere and so, workman is entitled to full back-wages.5. upon hearing and on perusal of impugned award, material on record and the decisions cited, i find that initially the burden to prove that workman has continuously worked for 240 days with the employer-bank in a given year preceding the date of alleged termination is on.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....was a loan transaction and had nothing to do with the aforementioned agreement to sell. 8 i may only indicate herein that the petitioner has, in fact, taken the stand that apart from the sum of rs.3,10,000/- paid at the time of execution of the aforementioned agreement to sell, to which i have made a reference above, a further sum of rs.6 lakhs was paid to the respondent. in other words, the petitioner claims that a total sum of rs.9.10 lakhs, out of rs.31 lakhs already stands paid to the respondent. 9 learned counsel for the parties have argued in line with their respective pleadings. in fact, learned counsel for the respondent says that there is no arbitration agreement in existence and, therefore, this petition ought to be dismissed. 10 i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. to my mind, while there may be defences that may be available to the respondent against the possible relief of specific arb. p. 823/2017 page 3 of 5 performance that the petitioner may claim before the arbitrator, what is clear, is that, it was the respondent who has approached the civil court under section 8 application contending that an arbitration agreement.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....that the charge sheet has already been filed. the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.01.2018.7. learned addl. pp, under instruction from the investigating officer, confirms that there is no involvement of the petitioner in any bail appln. 2573/2018 page 2 of 3 other case.8. keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case and also on perusal of the record, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.9. accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.... petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case.... petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.10. petition is disposed of in the above terms.11. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j december14 2018 ‘rs’ bail appln. 2573/2018 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT$~4 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + date of order:14. 12.2018 tr.p.(c.) 223/2018 hartesh goyal & anr ........ petitioners through: mr.rohit singh, advocate with ms.stuti mishra, advocate. versus naveen kumar gupta & anr through: none. coram: hon'ble mr. justice vinod goel ........ respondents despite service of notice, neither the respondents nor their 1. counsel are present.2.... petitioners seek transfer of their civil suit no.2890/2016 titled as ‘haritesh goyal & anr. vs. naveen kumar gupta & ors.’ from the court of ms.shuchi laler, learned additional district judge, east district karkardooma court, delhi to the court of smt. (dr.) hardeep kaur, learned additional district judge, shahdara district, karkardooma courts, delhi, where two other matters, i.e. suit no.2673/216 and another suit, are already pending. tr.p.(c) no.223/2018 page 1 of 2 3. learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the property in question is situated in krishna nagar, delhi, which falls within the jurisdiction of shahdara district.4. since the property in question is situated within the jurisdiction of shahdara district and two other suits are pending in the court of smt. (dr.).....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT