.....the complainant with cruelty for want of more dowry. it is submitted that marriage between complainant and the petitioner was solemnized in the year 2003 and according to the complainant, she spent one year peacefully and thereafter, petitioner started committing torture upon her. learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. considering matrimonial nature of the offence coupled with the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on his surrender, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, dhanbad, in connection with c.p. case no. 828 of 2012, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) cr.p.c. ambastha/- ( d.n.upadhyay,j.)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....mainly for the offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. looking to the evidences of the prosecution witnesses, especiallyofp.w.1,p.w.2andp.w.4,itappearsthattheyhavenotstatedany specificroleplayedbythisappellantincausinginjuriesuponthedeceased.3. inviewofthesefacts andalsolookingtothe order,passedbythis courtdated10thoctober,2012ini.a.no.310of2012incriminalappeal no.1540of2006,wehereby,suspendthesentenceawardedbythetrial courttothepresentappellant.duringpendencyofthisappeal,theappellant namely, maqbulansari,is directedtobereleasedonbailuponexecuting bondofrs.10,000/(rs.tenthousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount each,tothesatisfactionoftheivthadditionalsessionsjudge,fasttrack court,garhwa,inconnectionwithsessionstrialno.43of2005,onthe conditionthattheappellantshallnotchangehisresidentialaddress,without prior permission of the court and shall be available as and when his presenceisrequired. (d.n.patel,j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) vk/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and the petitioners on account of payment of wages to the informant. it is submitted that no case under section 307 ipc is made out . informant has been served with a valid notice, but he did not appear. only to extract money, this case has been lodged against the petitioners. learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. considering facts and circumstances of the case as appearing from the written report, all the four petitioners above named are directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, hazaribagh, in connection with katkamsandi ps case no. 6 of 2012 ( gr no. 34 of 2012), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) cr.p.c. ambastha/- ( d.n.upadhyay,j.)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTin the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no.48 of 2013 samsuddin ansari ..............................................petitioner versus the state of jharkhand and another ...........opposite parties coram: hon'ble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner :mr. mahesh tiwary for the state :a.p.p 4.15.4.13. having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the state, i am not inclined to interfere with the order passed on 13.6.2012 by the sub-divisional magistrate, barhi in case no.26 of 2012 for the reason that the order passed under section 144 of the code of criminal procedure has already lost its force. accordingly, this application stands dismissed. however, any finding recorded with respect to title or possession of the first party shall not be binding upon the petitioner. (r.r.prasad, j.) nd/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and learned counsel for the state as also learned counsel for the complainant-informant. petitioners have been made accused for the offence under sections 406/420/34 of the indian penal code in connection with bistupur p.s. case no.371 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.3331 of 2012 the complaint was filed by one samsher ali, wherein he has alleged that the petitioners and the complainant entered into an agreement on 12.2.2008 for sale of a shop in the premises of tisco friends co-operative society ltd., jamshedpur. it is submitted that pursuant to the agreement, rs.50,000/- was given through cheque dated 4.4.2008 and rs.5,30,000/- was paid in cash but the receipt of only rs.50,000/- was issued in favour of the complainant. it is alleged that even after about four years of time, the petitioners did not hand over the shop to the complainant nor the money has been returned back. with these allegations, the case was instituted against the petitioners. learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. it has been submitted that the occurrence, if any, is of year 2008 itself, but the complaint petition was lodged after an.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the nala police station. the petitioner's father died. after the death of the petitioner's father, the petitioner should have been appointed as choukidar, but in his place one fulchand bouri has been wrongly appointed. the petitioner filed application and also protested against the said appointment of fulchand bouri, but no order has been passed. learned j.c. to a.a.g. appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that if any application of the petitioner is pending, the same shall be considered and appropriate order shall be passed. considering the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing the deputy commissioner, jamtara to dispose of the petitioner's application dated 12.11.2011 within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. shamim/ (narendra nath tiwari, j)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for the petitioners nobody appeared and made any request nor any step for conducting the said case has been taken. under the circumstances, the interim relief granted earlier is required to be vacated. moreover, on merit also it appears that the order passed by the learned deputy commissioner appears to be in accordance with law and the learned deputy commissioner, after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances involved in the matter as also keeping in mind the provision as contained in santhal pargana tenancy act has rightly and properly passed the order in the interest of justice and therefore the said order is not required to be disturbed. therefore, this petition stands dismissed. the interim order passed earlier stands vacated. the respondent no.4 be extended the benefit as per order passed by learned deputy commissioner. copy of this order be sent to the respondent no. 4 by the court. . (p.p. bhatt, j) sd
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....courtanditappearsthattheinvestigatingofficerhasinadvertentlywritten thisstatementinthecasediary.itappearsthattheinvestigatingofficer wasdesperateingettingproductionwarrantandon11th april,2012,an applicationwasgivenanditwasadjournedaftermorethanonemonthi.e. 15thmay,2012andagainfor23rdmay,2012,but,theproductionwarrants werenotgivenandonebyonefortwooftheaccused,bailwasgrantedby 2 theconcernedtrialcourtsbecausethestatementmighthavebeenwritten inadvertentlyinthecasediarybytheinvestigatingofficer.3. lookingtotheaforesaidfacts,weseenoreasontoinitiateanyaction forcontemptofcourtagainsttheinvestigatingofficer,namely,hariprasad sah.accordingly,thiscontemptproceedingis,hereby,dropped. (d.n.patel,j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) ajay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTin the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. appeal (db) no. 469 of 2011 bir singh champia appellant versus the state of jharkhand ... ... ... respondent ------ coram: hon'ble mr. justice d. n. patel hon'ble mr. justice s. chandrashekhar ----- for the appellant: mr. r.p. gupta for the respondent: mr. p.k. sahay, a.p.p. ------ 13/dated: april, 15, 2013 per d.n. patel, j1) this appeal has already been admitted and record and proceedings of sessions trial no.12 of 2008 was called for from the trial court. this court has received record and proceedings of sessions trial no.12 of 2008. the record and proceedings is placed along with this criminal appeal and we have perused the record and proceedings of the sessions trial.2) counsel for the appellant, who is original accused no.1 in the sessions trial, has submitted that he is not pressing his prayer for suspension of sentence at this stage.3) in view of this submission, prayer for suspension of sentence is not granted. (d. n. patel, j) (s. chandrashekhar, j) manoj/cp.3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....and filed representation before the concerned authority, but no order has been passed till date. learned j.c. to a.g., appearing on behalf of the respondents, opposed the petitioner's prayer and submitted that the petitioner has not been found eligible for the post and, thus, there was no occasion for issuing any appointment letter. however, learned counsel admitted that no specific order has been passed on the petitioner's representation till date. considering the said facts and submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing the superintendent of police, garhwa-cum- chairman, palamau ranger driver police selection board, palamau, daltonganj-respondent no.3 to pass a specific reasoned order on the petitioner's representation, within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. shamim/ (narendra nath tiwari, j.)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT