.....district forum for the sake of brevity) in consumer complaint no.76 of 20007, mr. parasmal v. jain and another vs. m/s. sunny construction company. facts leading to this appeal can be summarized as under:- [2]Â respondents/original complainants, namely â mr. parasmal v. jain and smt. rasila parasmal jain (hereinafter referred to as âthe complainants for the sake of brevity) had filed consumer complaint before the state commission. it was filed seeking possession of flat booked by the complainants in the year 1992 for an consideration of rs.7,42,600/-. as per the prayers of the complainants were less than the pecuniary jurisdiction of this commission, the complaint was returned to the complainants for presenting it before an appropriate district forum. accordingly, the complainants filed a consumer complaint before the district forum 13/4/2007. sum and substance of the complaint was that the complainants had booked a flat bearing no.701, admeasuring 632 sq. ft. in area situated on the seventh floor of the building to be constructed by the appellant/original opponent, namely â m/s. sunny construction company (hereinafter referred to as âthe builder for the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....any other relief which the honble tribunal deem fit and proper may also be granted to the applicant along with the costs of litigation.â 2. facts of the case are that the applicant was working as data processing assistant (dpa)-b with the respondents. vide memorandum dated 26.02.2010 he was communicated acr/apar for the year 2008-09 containing the following adverse remarks in columns 22,23 and 24:- â22. overall assessment: the official wastes/consumes his energy in unwarranted issue rather than contributing potentially to office duties. grading : average. recommendations: needs to improve inter personal communications skills specially with seniors.â the applicant represented against these remarks on 05.03.2010. on 15.04.2010 the reviewing authority joint assistant director issued a clarificatory letter justifying the adverse remarks. in the light of the clarifications received the applicant made another representation on 21.04.2010 in continuation of his earlier representation. vide office memorandum dated 02.11.2010 the applicant was informed that the competent authority had expunged the remarks of the reviewing authority in column-24. however, his.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the naval hq and was assessed by senior officers who were aware of the cut off marks and therefore would have fairly assessed him. considering the fact that he was retained as the co of inhs jeevanti for three years and thereafter posted to a key and highly challenging post at naval hq, his numerical assessment should have been considered inconsistent and expunged. since the applicant cannot verify his acr markings being confidential, he has prayed that the tribunal check the facts and redress the grievances of the applicant. 7. the respondents have averred that promotion in the armed forces medical services are vacancy based and the merit list is prepared of all the officers of the batch with same parameters. the promotion of officers of the rank of colonels and equivalent in navy and air force and above are held under a common promotion board as per government of india, ministry of defence letter no.10(1)/2004/d(med) dated 14.01.2004. this promotion policy is amended from time to time. it has been submitted that the reports are written and numerical marks awarded based on the actual demonstrated performance of the officer during that particular year. the report initiated by.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....to pay him (applicant) money demanded from the complainant. however, the applicant has not been punished for the charge of demanding money. in fact the punishment meted out to him is only for causing injury to the complainant. thus, we cannot agree to the applicant's contention that in the disagreement note the charge levelled against him is different from what was given in the charge sheet. in fact charge is the same. only statement of pw-i regarding demand of money has been alluded to. in our opinion there is no infirmity in this. 12. the third ground taken by the applicant is that the disagreement note lists out ground second for disagreement with the eo as follows:- âthe eo has also not made any effort to bring on record the copy of prosecution sanction u/s 197 cr. pc against the hc which was granted and given on the facts of the case by dy. sec (home), gnct, delhi on 05/01/2007.â the applicant has pointed out that the prosecution sanction against him was given on 05.01.2007 i.e. much after 18.05.2006 the date on which the eo had submitted his enquiry report. thus, according to him this ground of the disagreement note is not maintainable. on perusal of the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....sentiment of kith and kin of the buried. the 1st defendant as self styled leader of the locality people have won over the political parties and in fact made proposals for laying road and the water supply pipeline in the middle of the graveyard land against the interest of the institution. the 1st defendant and his henchmen made to attempt to make use of the open land of the graveyard for playground and they would have succeeded in their evil attempts, had the plaintiff been little lethargic. the 1st defendant started the construction of his occupied house no.15-1-300 which is on the encroached land of the graveyard without proper municipal permits and plans and without no objection certificate from the 2nd defendant abutting and encroaching the graveyard land during the firs.week of april, 1998. immediately, the plaintiff has complained to the 2nd defendant, police and municipal authorities, but they have not taken any action as per law. the municipal authorities, particularly, the assistant town planner, circle no.ii under the 3rd defendant have ignored their prime and foremost duty to implement the municipal law and save the wakf land. the 1st defendant against the law and.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the invalidated section 22-a became inoperative and automatically stood nullified. it is an admitted fact that no notification has been issued under section 22-a (2) of the act of 1908, as it now stands. significantly, the ground of public policy, available in the earlier section 22-a of the act of 1908, no longer figures as a reason for prohibiting registration of documents under the present provision. thus, presently there is no notification issued under the existing section 22-a [2].of the act of 1908 prohibiting registration of documents relating to the subject land. it is however the contention of sr.n.sreedhar reddy, learned special government pleader, that notwithstanding the absence of a notification under section 22-a (2) of the act of 1908 in so far as the subject land is concerned, no document relating thereto could be registered as the prohibition envisaged by the extant section 22-a (1) (b) of the act of 1908 would apply. this court is however not persuaded to agree. section 22-a of the act of 1908, as it reads presently and to the extent relevant, is extracted hereunder: ".22-a. prohibition of registration of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....however, the order passed by the state commission gives all the necessary details of the application moved for condonation of delay. 2. the admitted facts of this case are these. the respondents/ complainants dr.parth prathim saha and shri panjak roy filed a complaint against maa jhande wali construction pvt. ltd., and shri anil gupta, the petitioners/builders, in the year 2011. earlier, the district forum had passed an ex-parte order on 28.07.2012. aggrieved by that order, an application for setting aside the ex-parte order was filed before the district forum on 05.11.2012. the said application was dismissed on 05.04.2013. aggrieved by that order the petitioners preferred first appeal before the state commission which was dismissed on 08.05.2013. 3. this is an admitted fact that the petitioners initially contested this case before the district forum. they had also filed written statement, copy of which has been placed on record and the same is dated 24.12.2011. the case of the petitioners is that in the month of february, 2012, anil gupta, the deponent suddenly fell ill and, therefore, could not appear before the district forum. he also could not inform his counsel and.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....present appeal has been filed by an aggrieved plaintiffs whose application for ad interim injunction under order-xxxix cpc was rejected.3. the brief facts are that the plaintiffs filed a suit - cs (os) 522/2013 in this court. in the suit, the plaintiffs claimed for a declaration and permanent injunction in respect of certain lands [(khasra nos.32/20/2 (1-6) and 32/21 (5-15)]. in revenue estate of village neelwal. the grievance specifically stated was that the government of nct of delhi had sought to allot on lease hold basis certain lands which included the suit land to the delhi jal board. fao (os) 245/2013 page 1 a declaration was sought that such grant was illegal and void and could not affect the plaintiffs’ rights. the plaintiffs also sought a consequential decree for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants - govt. of nct of delhi and delhi jal board from interfering with their peaceful and cultivatory possession of the suit lands.4. the learned single judge, by the impugned order dated 6.5.2013 took note of the pleadings; however, he rejected the claim for interim injunction in the following terms:“in the plaint, it is stated that plaintiffs are in actual.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....pay the maintenance @ rs.8,000/- and rs.6,000/respectively to the respondents 1 and 2 from the date of filing of the petition.2. briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent no.1 got married to the appellant according to sikh rites and ceremonies on 13.10.1991. parties cohabited as husband and wife and were blessed with a female child namely kumari naina on 23.10.1992. after the birth of the girl child, it seems that the parties had a matrimonial discord because of which the appellant herein filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty under section 13(1) (ia) of the hindu marriage act which was dismissed by the court of learned adj on 22.11.2000. a petition was filed by the appellant under section 25 and section 9 of the guardians and wards act for claiming the custody of the respondent no.2, minor child, which was also dismissed on 27.11.2000 by the guardianship court, delhi.3. so far as the respondent no.1 is concerned, she lodged an fir bearing no.869/1993, under section 406/498-a ipc at police station tilak nagar against the appellant and his mother. both the appellant and his mother were convicted for the aforesaid offences by.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....supply only 0.7 million mt coal and categorically stated that it would not be in a position to supply the balance 0.3 million mt coal. aware of the fact that as per its letter amci was not giving a categorical assurance and was pledging a course of supply in the future based on the assumption that the port facility would be available by april 01, 2008, amci categorically informed sail that it was advising sail to consider any other sourcing options that may be available.12. sail responded vide its letter dated january 01, 2008 requesting amci to ensure full contracted quantity being delivered within the delivery period and at least an attempt be made to supply at least 0.75 million mt coal within the delivery period to which vale responded by a polite letter in which we find no categorical stand taken by vale. polite letters were exchanged between the parties thereafter till when on march 25, 2008 amci informed that due to recent rainfalls the coal pits had been flooded with water and that the mining operations were at a standstill. it was informed that the accessible coal was exhibiting poor quality of coal. with reference to its letter dated december 18, 2007, amci informed.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT