.....made against present petitioner, present petitioner, named above, is ordered to be released on bail on executing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned sdjm, saraikella in connection with chandil p.s. case no. 68 of 2013, corresponding to g.r. no. 464 of 2013, subject to the following conditions:1. that applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this chapter.2. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.3. that applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.4. that the applicant shall mark his presence before the concerned police station on one of day in the first week of every month till the commencement of trial, and 5. that the applicant shall not leave india without the previous permission of the court. . (p.p. bhatt, j.) s.b.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case only on suspicion; noting incriminating has been recovered from the petitioners'possession;thepetitionersarelocalvillagersandman ofmeans;othercoaccused,namely,makunmundaandbiran mundahavebeengrantedbailbythelearnedsessionsjudge, hazaribagh;thepetitionersarelocalpermanentresidents;there isnochanceoftheirabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioners'prayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioners,abovenamed,aredirectedtobereleased on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/ (rupees ten thousand),each,withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, hazaribaghinconnectionwithkeredarip.s.caseno.10of2013, correspondingtog.r.no.455of2013. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioner has not been put on t. i parade; co-accused ravi ganjhu and arjun ganghu with almost similar allegations have been granted bail by this court in b. a. nos. 1449/2013 and 1519/2013 respectively; the petitioner is in custody since april 2013; the petitioner is a local permanent resident and there is no chance of his absconding. learned a.p.p opposed the petitioner's prayer for bail. however, he has not disputed the said factual contentions submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the sub-divisional judicial magistrate, latehar in connection with balumath p. s. case no. 39/12, corresponding to g. r. no. 254/12. s.k (narendra nath tiwari, j)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....information report; subsequently it was said that the petitioner wasseengoingwiththedeceasedandthereafterdeadbody wasrecovered;thesaidversionhascomeatalaterstage;there was no such allegation in the first information report; the petitioner is in custody since march, 2013 without any cogent materialagainsthim;heisalocalpermanentresident;thereisno chanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedsubdivisionaljudicialmagistrate,ranchiinconnection withdoranda(argora)p.s.caseno.87of2013,correspondingto g.r.no.1060of2013. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of politicalrivalry;thereisomnibusallegationagainstthemobof about500persons,inwhich75personshavebeennamed;there isnospecificallegationofanyovertactagainstthepetitioner; heisincustodysincedecember,2012;heisalocalpermanent resident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, dhanbad in connection withputkip.s.caseno.77of2012,correspondingtog.r.no.1552 of2012. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case at a latter stage; he is not named in the first information report; he has beenimplicatedinthecaseonlyontheconfessionalstatement ofcoaccusedranjeetkumarsingh;thepetitionerhasgotno criminalantecedent;heisincustodysincejanuary,2013;heisa localpermanentresident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, dhanbad in connection with govindpur (barwadda) p.s. case no.30 of 2013, correspondingtog.r.no.239of2013. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....with coaccused mote @ kasmuddin ansari; the allegation against said kasmuddin ansari was of opening fire on the informant due to land dispute; the said coaccused, against whomtherewasspecificallegation,hasbeengrantedbailby thiscourtinb.a.no.7467of2013;thepetitionerisincustodysince november,2012withoutanycogentmaterialagainsthim;heisa localpermanentresident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedsubdivisionaljudicialmagistrate,dumkainconnection withshikariparap.s.caseno.78of2012,correspondingtog.r. no.1174of2012. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioner submits that for an occurrence whereby certain miscreants robbed off the belongings of the driver, a case was registered against unknown. during investigation, one bimal das was arrested, who confessed his guilt and also disclosed about the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence but save and except the confession made by the co-accused, no evidence is there against the petitioner relating to complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence. regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of additional chief judicial magistrate, bermo at tenughat in bermo p.s. case no.73 of 2013 (g.r.no.444 of 2013). ( r. r. prasad, j.) nd/
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....father had stated him that the accused persons named in the fir have assaulted him and other person, namely, bharat singh. when son of dika kacchhap, namely, pradip kacchhap was examined by the prosecution in connection with the trial by other accused, he did depose that he had never stated like that and taking into account that aspect of the matter, deo sagar dixit, bhola kumar and yogesh singh have been admitted to bail and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing. regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate garhwa in bhandariya p.s. case no.12 of 2010 (g.r.no.449 of 2010). nd/ ( r. r. prasad, j.)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTin the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 5965 of 2013 sarju yadav. ........ petitioner versus the state of jharkhand . ...... opp. party --- coram: honble mr. justice p.p.bhatt for the petitioners : mr. rajeev kumar, adv. for the opp. party : adv. - -- 2/17.08.2013 learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction of his client, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. permission as sought for, is granted. accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of, as withdrawn. (p.p. bhatt, j.) anu/-
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT