.....produce marketing (regulation) general rules, 2000 (hereafter „the rules‟) in exercise of the powers conferred under section 106 of the act. rule 15 of the rules concerns grant of licences. sub-rule (3) of rule 15 of the rules specifies seven categories of licenses that may be issued. sub-rule (3) of rule 15 is set out below:-"“3) subject to security amount as may be fixed by the marketing committee under bye-laws, the licence fee for licences issued under this rule shall be as under: category of licencees a traders (wholesalers) including flour mills, oil expellers, dal mill, who purchase the agricultural produce to sell it after processing b commission agents carrying on business in the principal market or subsidiary market licence fee (rs.) per annum 100/- 100/- c brokers operating in principal and 100/- w.p.(c) 8323/2017& other connected matters page 8 of 11 subsidiary markets d processors, warehousemen including 100/- coldstorages and gowdown. having for carrying on e retailers established premises their business and selling to consumers only in the market area excluding the principal or subsidiary market f weighmen, measures, surveyors and other similar.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....3 situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute. 16.9. in such a case, the high court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice;” in the facts and circumstances of this case, i find that continuance of proceedings arising out of the cross firs in question would be an exercise in futility as the misunderstanding, which led to registration of these cross firs, now stands cleared amongst the parties. accordingly, cross fir no.755/2015 under sections 323/341/354(b)/451/506/5of ipc and fir no.754/2015 under sections 341/354(b)/451/5of ipc registered at police station jyoti nagar, delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua petitioners. these petitions and applications are accordingly disposed of. dasti. april05 2019 p’ma (sunil gaur) judge crl.m.c. 1819/2019 & crl.m.c. 1836/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....against the said company, if arises in future after the dissolution of the said company 10. the ol has received no objection certificates from the roc and income tax department.11. the ol has scrutinized the records submitted by the voluntary liquidator and has recorded satisfaction that necessary compliances of section 497 of the act and the other relevant provisions of the act have been made and that the affairs of the said company have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members.12. the ol, in these circumstances, has sought winding up and final dissolution of the said company from the date of filing of the petition i.e.28.03.2019 13. in view of the above and the satisfaction recorded by the ol, the said company is wound up and shall be deemed to be dissolved with effect from the date of the filing of the petition i.e.28.03.2019 14. a copy of the order be filed by the ol with the roc within the statutory period as per the act.15. the petition is accordingly disposed of. jayant nath, j april5 2019 sd co.pet.9/2019 page 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the defendant, its partners or proprietor as the case may be, its assignee in business, franchisees, licensee, distributors and agents from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, directly or indirectly dealing in pharmaceuticals goods or any medicinal trade mark elder/elder logo (s) or evervit or anyother trade mark /logo(s) as may be identical to or deceptively similar with the plaintiff trade mark elder /elder logo (s) or eldervit amounting to or abetting acts of passing off or unfair competition; product under the c. a decree directing the defendant to deliver up all the infringing and impugned packagings, printed material of infringing packagings, medicinal products bearing the impugned mark of elder or evervit, packaging, invoices, brochures and equipments used in printing the infringing packagings, printing cylinders, their blocks, negatives or dyes, as the case may be, to an authorized representative of the plaintiffs for destruction and also provide the details of the persons involved in printing the infringing packaging/material and the details of their partners or proprietor as the case may be, their dealers, representatives and those acting in concert with.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....that it was not aware that gst was to be included as a part of the lease rental for the purposes of the calculation of the stamp duty, and the facts of the case do not warrant imposition of penalty as there was no w.p. (c) 2872/2019 page 2 of 4 intention on the part of the petitioner to evade any stamp duty.7. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner readily accepts that the gst on lease rental is required to be included for calculation of the stamp duty. he also states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the deficient stamp duty. in view of the above, the only question that is required to be addressed is with regard to the levy of penalty of ₹9,72,483/-.8. mr sanjoy ghose, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submitted that the petitioner is a bank and, therefore, ought to have correctly computed the stamp duty. he further submits that since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal, the petitioner ought to be relegated to the said remedy for determination of the question whether the levy of penalty was warranted in the facts of the present case. he also states that in terms of section 45 of the act, the petitioner is required to pay the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....on the basis of settlement deed of 22nd january, 2019. upon notice, learned additional public prosecutor for respondent no.1-state submits that sections 3 & 4 of dowry prohibition act, 1961 have been added and respondent no.2, present in the court, is the complainant/first-informant of fir in question and she has been identified to be so, by si indrapal singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. crl.m.c. 1834/2019 page 1 of 3 respondent no.2, present in the court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid settlement deed and submits that she will withdraw the application under section 156(3) of cr.p.c. provided a sum of ₹5,00,000/- in terms of the settlement deed of 22nd january, 2019 is paid to her. learned counsel for petitioner submits that needful shall be done. respondent no.2 affirms the contents of her affidavit of 26th march, 2019 supporting this petition and submits that now no dispute with petitioners survives and so, the proceedings arising out of the fir in question be brought to an end. supreme court in parbatbhai aahir @ parbatbhai bhimsinhbhai vs. state of gujarat (2017) 9 scc641has reiterated the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....affidavit was disregarded and the trial court held that there was no evidence filed and thus her petition seeking maintenance was dismissed.9. the facts of the case show a very grim picture. parties were married on 20.04.1998 and separated on 12.10.1998. respondent initiated subject proceedings on 14.05.2003 under section 125 cr.p.c. claiming maintenance. trial court granted interim maintenance @ rs. 2000/- per month. proceedings remained pending from 2003 till 2012. during the said period also, despite the fact that maintenance was awarded only at rs. 2,000/- per month, the petitioner-husband did not comply with the order and respondent was constrained to file execution petitions from time to time to recover the awarded amount.10. on 08.10.2012, the respondent – wife was not present. her father moved a hand written application seeking exemption from appearance on the ground that she was not well and was referred to a crl.rev.p. 280/2015 page 3 of 6 government hospital. said application was rejected and the court closed her evidence and as there was no evidence on record pronounced the judgment dismissing the petition holding that she had failed to prove that she was the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in our view, any power which is vested in an authority has to be exercised reasonably and in a bona fide manner. the petitioners do not deny the fact that the respondent has been continuously serving it since 06.02.1986. pertinently, he was initially engaged even earlier between 1974-1976. the petitioners have not found the services of the respondent to be deficient over the years as a helper in the canteen of the press. the fact that he did not meet the educational qualification of x standard pass, has never come in the way of the respondent in discharging his duties efficiently. it is in this light that this court had earlier directed the petitioners to consider the respondent’s case for regularization as and when a sanctioned vacancy becomes available by relaxation of the rules, which order has attained finality.8. since the tribunal has granted relief to the respondent who has been knocking into the doors of justice since 1998, in exercise of our discretionary jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order particularly when the petitioners have already, in compliance with directions of the tribunal,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....produce marketing (regulation) general rules, 2000 (hereafter „the rules‟) in exercise of the powers conferred under section 106 of the act. rule 15 of the rules concerns grant of licences. sub-rule (3) of rule 15 of the rules specifies seven categories of licenses that may be issued. sub-rule (3) of rule 15 is set out below:-"“3) subject to security amount as may be fixed by the marketing committee under bye-laws, the licence fee for licences issued under this rule shall be as under: category of licencees a traders (wholesalers) including flour mills, oil expellers, dal mill, who purchase the agricultural produce to sell it after processing b commission agents carrying on business in the principal market or subsidiary market licence fee (rs.) per annum 100/- 100/- c brokers operating in principal and 100/- w.p.(c) 8323/2017& other connected matters page 8 of 11 subsidiary markets d processors, warehousemen including 100/- coldstorages and gowdown. having for carrying on e retailers established premises their business and selling to consumers only in the market area excluding the principal or subsidiary market f weighmen, measures, surveyors and other similar.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice;” in the facts and circumstances of this case, i find that continuance of proceedings arising out of the fir in question would be an exercise in futility as the misunderstanding, which led to registration of the fir in question, now stands cleared amongst the parties. accordingly, this petition is allowed subject to costs of ₹25,000/- to be deposited by petitioners with prime minister’s national relief fund within a week from today. upon placing on record the proof of deposit of crl.m.c. 1818/2019 page 2 of 3 costs within a week thereafter and handing over its copy to the investigating officer, fir no.2860/2015, under sections 3of ipc, registered at police station mehrauli, delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom shall stand quashed qua petitioners. this petition and application are accordingly disposed of. dasti. april05 2019 p’ma (sunil gaur) judge crl.m.c. 1818/2019 page 3 of 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT