.....ipc is not compoundable. the parties are constrained to move this court for quashing on the basis of amicable resolution arrived at by them in the facts and circumstances noted above.9. the scope and ambit of the power conferred on this court by section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (cr. pc) read with articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, in the particular context of prayer for quashing criminal proceedings, was examined by the supreme court in b.s. joshi and ors. vs. state of haryana and anr., (2003) 4 scc675 against the backdrop of a catena of earlier decisions. noting, with reference to the decision in state of karnakata vs. l muniswamy, (1977) 2 scc699 that in exercise of this “inherent” and “wholesome power”, the touchstone is as to whether “the ends of justice so require”, and it was observed thus : justify in quashing the high court “10. ... that in a criminal case, the veiled object behind a lame prosecution, the very nature of the material on which the structure of the prosecution rests and the like would the proceeding in the interest of justice and that the ends of justice are higher than the ends of mere law though justice.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....were arrested on his identification. he further deposed that ramanjeet singh got a gandasa recovered from under the bushes situated near the factory of one ravi which was seized vide seizure memo (ex.pw-13/g); that ramanjeet singh and manpreet pointed out the place of the incident vide ex.pw- 13/j; that a week prior to the incident, rummy (ramanjeet singh) had a quarrel with him at a barber shop after which the witness called the police at number 100. both were taken to the police station where ramanjeet singh had threatened to eliminate him and his family. the witness also proved the site plan of recovery of the gandasa as ex.pw- 13/g. he identified the gandasa as ex.p-1; clothes of the deceased as crl.a.nos.536/2016, 612/2016 & 613/2016 page 8 of 31 ex.p-2 (colly) [blue jeans as ex.p-2a, white shirt as ex.p-2b, blue and white sweater as ex.p-2c and greyish/greenish banyan as ex.p-2d, the woollen cap of black color and a pair of red stripe and blue colour slippers as ex.p-3 & ex.p-4. the t-shirt which was got recovered by the said witness was identified as ex.p-5].. he also identified a pair of brown colour leather slippers, stated to be of ramanjeet singh, as ex.p-6.17......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the said amount would earn profit of rs.50 lakhs per month once environmental clearance was granted and accordingly, further rs.3.15 crores was, in fact, paid by the plaintiff vide the receipt dated 23rd september, 2014.4. however, the investment could not fructify, inasmuch as the environmental clearance for the said two lands was not given. finally, in view of this position, the parties entered into a cancellation deed dated 25th cs (comm) 1090/2018 page 2 of 8 september, 2015, which is the contract on the basis of which the present suit under order xxxvii cpc has been filed. the said contract entered into between the plaintiff and defendant finally recorded that the defendant shall repay a sum of rs.22,32,00,000/- to the plaintiff and simultaneously the land, which was transferred in favour of plaintiff, would be transferred back to the defendant. the said cancellation deed also records that a sum of rs.2 crores would be paid by the defendant to plaintiff on or before 31st october, 2015.5. the present suit under order xxxvii cpc, accordingly, was filed on the ground that the amounts, as agreed in the cancellation deed, were not paid by the defendant. the suit was registered.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....were arrested on his identification. he further deposed that ramanjeet singh got a gandasa recovered from under the bushes situated near the factory of one ravi which was seized vide seizure memo (ex.pw-13/g); that ramanjeet singh and manpreet pointed out the place of the incident vide ex.pw- 13/j; that a week prior to the incident, rummy (ramanjeet singh) had a quarrel with him at a barber shop after which the witness called the police at number 100. both were taken to the police station where ramanjeet singh had threatened to eliminate him and his family. the witness also proved the site plan of recovery of the gandasa as ex.pw- 13/g. he identified the gandasa as ex.p-1; clothes of the deceased as crl.a.nos.536/2016, 612/2016 & 613/2016 page 8 of 31 ex.p-2 (colly) [blue jeans as ex.p-2a, white shirt as ex.p-2b, blue and white sweater as ex.p-2c and greyish/greenish banyan as ex.p-2d, the woollen cap of black color and a pair of red stripe and blue colour slippers as ex.p-3 & ex.p-4. the t-shirt which was got recovered by the said witness was identified as ex.p-5].. he also identified a pair of brown colour leather slippers, stated to be of ramanjeet singh, as ex.p-6.17......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....mrs. narinder sharma, has been permitted, by order dated 06.05.2016, to prosecute the appeal. crl. a567568/2000 page 2 of 17 3. certain indisputable facts which emerge from the evidence on record, and the submissions of both sides, may be taken note of at the outset.4. both the appellants were members of delhi police holding the rank of sub inspector (si), they being posted at the relevant point of time in crime branch, their office being located at police headquarters near ito, new delhi, inspector mahinder kumar sharma (pw7) being their immediate superior. kishore kumar (pw1), the complainant of the case at hand would run the business of “recruiting agency” in the name and style of k.m. enterprises, his office being in flat no.203, at the second floor level of property no.a-31-34, jaina house extension, dr. mukherjee nagar commercial complex, delhi. it may be mentioned here that he at that time (pw-1) was a resident of property no.e-10, vijay nagar, delhi.5. pw-1 had advertised his business and concededly had been approached by a person named c. rajan, a resident of kerala, for assistance to get employment in gulf countries, he having remitted to pw1, a demand draft of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....material on the basis of which cognizance for the offences in question has been taken against petitioners. impugned order does take note of the fact that prior sanction under section 19 of the pc act is required but strangely directs the cbi to approach the competent authority for obtaining the sanction, without disclosing as to under which provision of law, such a direction can be issued. in somewhat similar case of vasanti dubey (supra), supreme court has quashed the order refusing to crl.rev.p.307/2017 crl.rev.p.600/2017 crl.m.c. 1977/2017 crl.m.c. 3149/2017 crl.m.c. 4048/2017 crl.m.c. 1370/2017 page 4 of 6 accept the closure report, as no reasons were forthcoming for not accepting the closure report. in the facts of these cases also, i find that there was no valid justification for the trial court to not to accept the closure report, as i find that in the closure report it is categorically recorded that no material has come on record to justify the allegations levelled against petitioners. it is a matter of record that the first closure report was not accepted by the trial court in september, 2014 and further investigation was directed. even after further investigation,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the respondent no.2 to accept the declaration of the petitioner; iii) any other orders that this hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. wp (c)4416/2019 page 1 of 9 2. the election commission of india, vide notification dated 16.03.2019 issued under sub section (2) of section 14 of the representative of people act, 1951 announced “lok sabha general elections, 2019” to elect members of the house of people. in terms of the above notification, the relevant election schedule published for nct of delhi is reproduced as follows:-"schedule reference parliamentary constituencies schedule no.no.of pcs going to poll 6 7 sl. pc no.pc name 1 1 type gen gen chandni chowk north east delhi issue of notification 16-04-2019 2 2 for last date nomination scrutiny of nomination filing last due date for withdrawal of candidature date of poll counting of votes date before which election shall be completed 23-04-2019 3 3 east delhi gen2404-2019 4 26-04-2019 5 12-05-2019 6 23-05-2019 7 27-05-2019 4 5 6 7 new delhi gen north west delhi west delhi sc gen south delhi gen3 the petitioner filed his nomination paper for contesting the general election to.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....were arrested on his identification. he further deposed that ramanjeet singh got a gandasa recovered from under the bushes situated near the factory of one ravi which was seized vide seizure memo (ex.pw-13/g); that ramanjeet singh and manpreet pointed out the place of the incident vide ex.pw- 13/j; that a week prior to the incident, rummy (ramanjeet singh) had a quarrel with him at a barber shop after which the witness called the police at number 100. both were taken to the police station where ramanjeet singh had threatened to eliminate him and his family. the witness also proved the site plan of recovery of the gandasa as ex.pw- 13/g. he identified the gandasa as ex.p-1; clothes of the deceased as crl.a.nos.536/2016, 612/2016 & 613/2016 page 8 of 31 ex.p-2 (colly) [blue jeans as ex.p-2a, white shirt as ex.p-2b, blue and white sweater as ex.p-2c and greyish/greenish banyan as ex.p-2d, the woollen cap of black color and a pair of red stripe and blue colour slippers as ex.p-3 & ex.p-4. the t-shirt which was got recovered by the said witness was identified as ex.p-5].. he also identified a pair of brown colour leather slippers, stated to be of ramanjeet singh, as ex.p-6.17......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....material on the basis of which cognizance for the offences in question has been taken against petitioners. impugned order does take note of the fact that prior sanction under section 19 of the pc act is required but strangely directs the cbi to approach the competent authority for obtaining the sanction, without disclosing as to under which provision of law, such a direction can be issued. in somewhat similar case of vasanti dubey (supra), supreme court has quashed the order refusing to crl.rev.p.307/2017 crl.rev.p.600/2017 crl.m.c. 1977/2017 crl.m.c. 3149/2017 crl.m.c. 4048/2017 crl.m.c. 1370/2017 page 4 of 6 accept the closure report, as no reasons were forthcoming for not accepting the closure report. in the facts of these cases also, i find that there was no valid justification for the trial court to not to accept the closure report, as i find that in the closure report it is categorically recorded that no material has come on record to justify the allegations levelled against petitioners. it is a matter of record that the first closure report was not accepted by the trial court in september, 2014 and further investigation was directed. even after further investigation,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT