.....for one reason or the other. the petitioners state that they cleared the firs.and second tests, though with some delay, and taking note of the fact that the third test was not conducted by the government itself, a provisional seniority list for the post of sfo was prepared in the year 2003, virtually reflecting the order of merit in the selection list in respect of such of the persons, who have cleared the firs.and second tests prescribed under rule 12 of the rules. in the revised provisional seniority list dated, 20.04.2007, also the same is said to have been reflected. thereafter, a final seniority list was published on 15.11.2007. on the basis of the seniority reflected therein, the petitioners were promoted as assistant district fire officers.in the year 2009, representations were made by some of the sfos., raising objection to the final seniority list. alleging that no steps are taken on the representations, the respondents 3 to 5 herein filed o.a.no.4926 of 2009 challenging the final seniority list, dated 15.11.2007. it was mentioned that at one stage, the tribunal passed interim order directing that the representations of the respondents 3 to 5 herein be considered,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....previous records issued the petitioner a caste certificate as he belongs to konda kapu community, though the petitioner and his family members in fact, belong to kapu (oc) community. it is asserted by the 6th respondent that at the time of issuance of permanent caste certificate to the petitioner, the family status of the petitioner was pending before the collector and consequently, the caste certificate issued by the tahsildar, in-charge is not valid.11. it is further contended by him that as per the order dated 09.09.2008 the caste certificate of the petitioner was cancelled by the district collector, east godavari. notification was also issued, which is filed by the petitioner along with the election petition. the community certificates as well as the other documents filed by the petitioner are bogus, false and created. he asserted that since the district collector had already cancelled the caste certificate of the petitioner and the same was published in the official gazettee, the petitioner has never been declared as belonging to scheduled tribe by the competent court, more particularly by the high court of andhra pradesh, his caste is still in dispute, and therefore, he.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the debts recovery tribunal allowed original application directing recovery of the amount from upsccl. for facility, the operative portion of the order is extracted hereunder:- œit is therefore, ordered:- that the original application no.291 of 2001 of the applicants-icici ltd. and kotak mahindra bank ltd., for issuance of recovery certificate to the tune of rs.56,41,37,770.00 (rs. fifty six crores forty one lacs thirty seven thousand seven hundred seventy only) together with pendentelite and future interest @ 12% per annum with half yearly rest is allowed with cost on contest against the defendant no.1 now represented by the official liquidator and dismissed on contest against defendant no.4 (ifci), defendant no.6 (allahabad bank) and defendant no.7 (state bank of india) and disposed of ex parte against the defendant no.2 and dismissed against defendant no.3 (idbi) and defendant no.5 (lic). the applicant bank is entitled the said interest from the date of filing of the application till the full recovery is made through the official liquidator appointed by the order of the hon'ble high court.? in the year 2007, the official liquidator made certain recoveries and handed.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....is the authorised dealer of tata motors ltd. and is op no. 1 in the complaint. in rp no. 297/2013, the petitioner is tata motors ltd., which is manufacturer of the vehicle in question and has been made op no. 2 in the complaint. this single order shall dispose of both the revision petitions and a copy of the same be kept on each file. 2. brief facts of the case are that the complainant, who is a professor in the op jindal university, sonepat, purchased a tata indigo cs lxi car from op no. 1 malwa automobiles pvt. ltd. on 14.09.2010 for a consideration of rs.4,77,900/. as alleged, the car started creating abnormal sound from the engine, within two days of purchase. a telephonic complaint was registered with the sales person sanjeev kumar of op no. 1. the complainant, thereafter, took the car to tayal motors, authorised dealer of op no. 2 at faridabad on 04.10.2010, where service was done and the engineers assured that the car will run smoothly. however, the defect of abnormal noise in the engine continued and the engine also emitted bad smell, like smoke coming out of burnt rubber. the factum of abnormal noise has been mentioned in the job cards also. the complainant obtained.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the debts recovery tribunal allowed original application directing recovery of the amount from upsccl. for facility, the operative portion of the order is extracted hereunder:- œit is therefore, ordered:- that the original application no.291 of 2001 of the applicants-icici ltd. and kotak mahindra bank ltd., for issuance of recovery certificate to the tune of rs.56,41,37,770.00 (rs. fifty six crores forty one lacs thirty seven thousand seven hundred seventy only) together with pendentelite and future interest @ 12% per annum with half yearly rest is allowed with cost on contest against the defendant no.1 now represented by the official liquidator and dismissed on contest against defendant no.4 (ifci), defendant no.6 (allahabad bank) and defendant no.7 (state bank of india) and disposed of ex parte against the defendant no.2 and dismissed against defendant no.3 (idbi) and defendant no.5 (lic). the applicant bank is entitled the said interest from the date of filing of the application till the full recovery is made through the official liquidator appointed by the order of the hon'ble high court.? in the year 2007, the official liquidator made certain recoveries and handed.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....petitioner in its impugned order and while discussing his appeal and the complaint, it has recorded the following reasons in support of the impugned order:- œwe perused the impugned order and the documents placed before us. we are finding that the order passed by the forum below is just and proper. respondent published prospectus for their correspondence courses. complainant has taken admission for b.ed. course. the pamphlet issued shows it is a government of india recognized course. notification dated 17/05/1988 issued by central board of secondary education (under human resource ministry of union of india) recognized b.ed. degree of hindi sahitya sammelan, prayag, allahabad. complainant mamta appeared and passed said examination after completing the course term at the institute of opposite party. the complainant must have filled form to appear to b.ed. examination conducted on behalf of hindi sahitya sammelan, prayag, allahabad and therefore, there cannot be any surprise, as alleged, on receipt of the mark sheet issued by said institution. it is nowhere represented that said course is recognized by government of maharashtra. under the circumstances, the very foundation.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....they remained absent. the service of notice upon ops is held sufficient. the complainant appeared in person and argued vehemently. he reiterated the facts of this case, hospitalization details and brought our attention towards several authorities of honble apex court. hence, we proceeded for exparte order. the points of our consideration are:- i) whether the complainant proved his case of alleged negligence on the part of the doctor? ii) whether the doctor acted cautiously in accordance to the standard medical practice? iii) if there is medical negligence then what is the liability of opposite parties? 5. we have perused the affidavit evidence of complainant and the available medical records of op hospital. it is clear that smt. c. kusuma reddy, wife of complainant is 36 yrs. old, and was under treatment of op dr. padmini, for menstrual disturbances, from 2009 and in the month of july 2010, after investigations she was diagnosed as a case of uterine fibroid with endometriosis. she was treated by tab. danogen -50 mg and tab. pyricontin 10mg for 30 days. 6. we find that before filing this complaint the complainant had approached several authorities like nhrc, shrc, medical council.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....complaint on 26th august, 2013 with the following prayers: 1. order restoration of plot no. 15/34 in vasundhra yojna, ghaziabad by withdrawing the order of cancellation. 2. order grant of bank interest on money deposited so as to adjust against the cost of the plot. 3. since the plot allotted to me is two side open corner plot on the main road of vasundhara yojana which is worth rs.2.5 crores as per present market value. therefore, the plot of similar size and location be allotted to me on the strength of merit of my case. 2. briefly stated allegations in the complaint are that late shri daya prakash goel, father of the petitioner registered with the op for allotment of plot in vasundhra yojna on 14.02.1985 by depositing registration fee of rs.5000/-. after his death, the registration was transferred in the name of the complainant on 17.09.1991 and he was allotted plot no. 15/34 measuring 175.35 sq. mtr in the aforesaid scheme on 07.12.1991 at the cost of rs.2,31,462/-. in view of the heavy consideration amount, the complainant vide letter dated 16.03.1992 requested the op to relax the payment condition by allowing the complainant to pay the consideration amount in easy.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of two counsel. judgment navsa adp, (ponnan, bosielo and pillay jja and meyer aja concurring): [1] it could with some justification be said that the facts on which the appeal before us is premised give credence to the ironic and cynical expression: no good deed goes unpunished.1the appeal is about the legality of the continued detention of the respondent, mr ashwell du plessis (du plessis), after what the parties agree was his lawful arrest. it examines, against the specific circumstances of the case, the legal duties resting on the police and on prosecution authorities after an arrest has been made. it brings into sharp focus the independent role that prosecutors should play in the public interest and weighs this against the pressures under which they operate. it considers the balance to be struck between, on the one side, the police forces battle against crime, coupled with the practical difficulties and logistics attendant upon the administration of justice, and on the other side, the premium that our legal system places on personal freedom. the limited facts that emerged during the trial in the court below are set out hereafter. [2] during the night of saturday 28 february.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....court that on my arrival there i found that those people were already lying down and they were being assaulted. . . . . so you cannot safely say exactly who took the bicycle from your possession? --- correct.' 6. thus in respect of all of the charges that had been proffered against the appellants there was no direct evidence implicating any of them. in addition, the state case rested; in so far as the first appellant was concerned on a warning statement that he had allegedly made to a captain ramukhadi and a pointing out to a captain mutsila; and, in respect of the third appellant on a statement that he had allegedly made to an inspector shonisani. 7. in granting leave to the appellants to appeal to this court ebersohn aj recorded: when hearing the application the court pointed out to both counsel that inadmissible statements by the accused were admitted in evidence by lukoto j and other irregularities which were also committed by the late lukoto j. mr poodhun who appeared for the state conceded the irregularities, pointed out other irregularities too and he conceded that the convictions and imposed sentences of all the accused could not stand in view of the fatal.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT