.....the mou dated 02.08.2017 while he was in judicial custody. it is stated that plaintiff no.1 in view of various firs registered against him and the fact that he was cs(os) 687/2017 page 1 of 10 in judicial custody started fearing for the safety of his family and ultimately succumbed to the pressure mounted by defendant no.1 and other defendants. he was coerced to give into their demands. regarding the settlement agreement dated 27.07.2017, it is pleaded that the relatives of plaintiff no.1 were coerced and intimidated into executing the said settlement agreement. it has been pointed out that plaintiff no.1 was in judicial custody from 02.07.2017 to 10.08.2017.2. i may only note that the matter is only at the stage of issuing summons to the defendants.3. when this matter came up for hearing on 09.01.2018, this court had not issued summons and noted as follows:-"“6. the counsel for the plaintiffs states that the consequences under section 64 of the indian contract act, 1872 will follow and status quo ante will be restored. it is also stated that the plaintiffs have not derived any benefit.7. the narration in the plaint appears to suggest that the plaintiff no.l was coerced into.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....has decided that the-recommendation of the jac should also be considered as the recommendation of the university. therefore, considering the facts above and based on the recommendation of jac and ggsip university the provisional noc for course with intake for (1) bba-7yrs & bba [2nd shift].-7yrs.(2) bba (cam) -3yrs. & bba (cam) (2nd shift)-3yrs. (3) bca-3yrs. (5) ba,ll.b.-18yrs (2) bba, ll.b.-12yrs following conditions:-"the society/institute shall abide by all the rules and regulations in force in delhi by the government, local authorities and the affiliating university. is granted subject to w.p.(c) no.8163/2019 page 6 of 33 a. the society/institute shall abide by all the rules and regulations in force in delhi by the government, local authorities and the affiliating university. b. the society/ institute shall follow the fee structure prescribed by the university/govt. of nct of delhi c. if it comes to the knowledge of govt. of nct of delhi that the noc has obtained by giving any false or misleading information or by concealing or suppressing any material facts or shall be withdrawn/cancelled. the noc granted information, d. the university shall monitor compliance of.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT$~17 * % in the high court of delhi at new delhi + w.p.(c) 6694/2017 krishan dabas date of decision:13. h august, 2019 ........ petitioner through: mr.prakhar bhatnagar, mr.mohit tyagi, mr.aman kharb, ms.ritu raj kumari, advocates versus m/s sapphire cables & services pvt ltd..... respondent through: mr.jayant k. mehta, mr.manikya harpalani, khanna, ms.drishti mr.pratyaksh sharma, advocates coram: hon'ble mr. justice j.r. midha judgment (oral) the petitioner has challenged the award dated 04th march, 2017 1. passed by the labour court whereby the labour court held the termination of the petitioner to be illegal and awarded compensation of rs.3 lakh in lieu of reinstatement. the petitioner is seeking reinstatement with back wages and in the alternative, enhancement of the compensation.2. the petitioner joined the respondent as a cable operator on 04th april, 2003. the respondent terminated the petitioner without any enquiry on 23rd february, 2011 whereupon the petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the labour court.3. learned counsel for the petitioner urged at the time of the hearing that w.p.(c)6694/2017 page 1 of 3 the petitioner has been illegally terminat
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....regular employee and not a daily wager driver as alleged w.p.(c)5070/2013, 2059/2014 page 2 of 3 by the dtc. the workman filed an application under section 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act which was withdrawn on the objection that an industrial dispute should be raised whereupon the workman raised an industrial dispute.6. according to dtc, the workman was awarded reinstatement with 25% back wages as a daily wager by the award dated 15th december, 1999 whereas according to the workman, he was awarded reinstatement as a regular employee with 25% back wages by the award dated 15th december, 1999.7. the award dated 15th december, 1999 of the labour court has been examined. in that award, no issue was raised as to the status of the workman i.e. whether he was a daily wager or a regular employee and consequently there is no finding of the labour court that he was a regular employee. the workman joined the duty in terms of the above award on 01st january, 2003 and he retired on 30th april, 2009. the belated claim for regularization raised by the employee after the retirement is not maintainable. however, no interference is warranted in the financial benefits granted to the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in the advertisement in question, apart from the written test, the interview was also to be conducted. w.p.(c) no.9671/2017 page 6 of 14 8. but the fact remains that the petitioners not only qualified the written examination but also qualified the interview conducted by respondent no.2. therefore, i do not find any substance in the arguments advanced by counsel for respondent no.2, therefore, the junior technical assistant were appointed on a different educational qualification criteria.9. based upon the above facts and the judgments, a similar issue came before the high court of gujarat at ahmedabad in case of mamta a ghodasara & 2 ors. vs. state of gujarat through principal secretary & 2 ors. which was decided on 17.02.2011 in a special civil petition no.526/2011 whereby it is held as under: “20. it would be relevant to consider the specific language and the words used in the rules. it is stated that a candidate must possess a bachelor's degree of any recognized university with one of the subjects named therein, such as botany, chemistry, physics and zoology. if rule 4(b) of the acf rules is read carefully, it is seen that the first portion thereof envisages that the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....wherein, the hon'ble supreme court of india had granted leave vide order dated 15.12.2015, but no interim/relief was granted therein. in fact, the hon'ble supreme court of india vide order dated 29.01.2019 specifically directed to pay pensionary benefits to the respondent in c.a. no.14666/2015 arising out of slp (c) no.37207 of 2013 within a period of four weeks from the said date.33. counsel for the petitioner further submits that the case of petitioner is on better footing and entities him pension in terms of extant regulation 33 of pension regulations, which was deemed to be existing on 15.01.1994.34. learned counsel further submits that the circular dated 16.03.2018 issued by iba cannot supersedes the pnb employees pension regulations 1995 and no distinction can be drawn between employees compulsorily retired before or after 29.09.1995.35. further the case of the petitioner is that forfeiture of bank's contribution to provident fund of the petitioner came to his knowledge vide letter dated 23.01.2018 as such, there is no delay in filing the writ petition. w.p.(c) 7518/2018 page 11 of 18 36. regulation 33 inter-alia provides that an employee compulsorily retired.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....dated 19.09.2014, 17.11.2014, 24.04.2015 and 13.05.2015 issued by respondent no.1 to the petitioner. w.p.(c) 8489/2016 page 1 of 32 3. the brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as a meter reader in the erstwhile delhi electric supply undertaking (“desu”) on 08.10.1974 (employee no.17068). the petitioner received a memo dated 24.10.1990 whereby an alleged charge of misconduct was levelled against him, which contained in the statement of article of charge, is reproduced as under:-"“shri d.p. sharma, while functioning as a meter reader, is alleged to be guilty of charge of misconduct as he with ulterior motive and to favour the consumer of k.no.s- 115996, sa-11598 did not issue the statement iii and statement ii in the month of june 1980 and october 1982 as detailed in the state of imputations of misconduct.” 4. further case of the petitioner is that during the course of inquiry proceedings, the inquiry officer shri d. dass gupta wrote a letter to shri u.s. tripathi, vigilance officer (g), rph thereby bringing to the notice of said u.s. tripathi that in the case of the petitioner, it had already been stated that the misconduct was alleged to have.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....person, i.e., the assessee. in such specified circumstances, the extended period of six years is applicable. the proviso noticeably mandates satisfaction of two conditions. it refers to the formation of “reasons to believe” by the commissioner. the said “reasons to believe”, have to be formed by the commissioner. secondly, the said expression “reasons to believe” must have nexus and live link with failure to pay tax because of concealment, omission or failure to disclose material particulars by the assessee. thus, the commissioner is required to form an opinion in the nature of “reasons to believe” that there was failure, omission or concealment to disclose material particulars which had the effect of short-payment or non-payment of tax. the “reasons to believe” and satisfaction of any of the three stipulations are a jurisdiction precondition and a mandatory requirement which must be met to apply and seek benefit of extended period of six years.” 15. it was further observed as under: “10...in case, reasons to believe are not recorded or so indicated/mentioned in the default assessment order or in the record, it would lead to an anomalous and aberrant.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of the university, he/she will be declared unsuccessful. super- the academic standard as w.p. (c) 8303/2019 page 4 of 19 added to the above is the fact that the number of students, who may even now seek admissions, may not be very large to require holding of any test to determine their inter-se merit for grant of admission. the argument advanced by mr. gupta that the colleges may have to hold independent cet for granting admissions, which may delay the completion of admission process, is in our opinion, misplaced. such a situation could arise only where the number of students applying is more than the number of seats available in the institutions. that, however, is not the position in the instant case. even so, the apprehension that lesser merited students may be admitted while ignoring meritorious students, can be allayed by directing that the institutions shall grant admissions strictly in accordance with the merit in the qualifying examination, which is one of the recognized norms for granting such admissions”, thus, submitting to the effect that there can be no apprehension that the lesser merited students may take admission in as much as the institutions grant admission.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....petition filed under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. the petition has been filed in the background of the following broad facts:3. a notice inviting tender (nit) was issued on 25.6.2012 for turnkey supply, installation and commissioning of cold rooms, ginger washing line, material handling and allied equipments etc. for ginger collection centre at iid center, naltali in the district of nagaon, assam (in short “the subject works”).4. on 3.8.2012, the petitioner made an offer. the petitioner’s offer was accepted. accordingly, a work order was issued to the petitioner on arb.p. no.505/2019 pg.1 of 5 7.12.2012. the total contract value was pegged at rs.1,55,31,750/-. the petitioner issued a letter of acceptance (loa) on 17.12.2012. the loa, however, was issued by the petitioner subject to certain terms and conditions being accepted by the respondent. 4.1 in particular, the petitioner had indicated that the respondent should release advance payment for execution of the subject works.5. thereafter, on 12.1.2013, the petitioner addressed a letter to the respondent to fix a date to discuss issues related to the mutual acceptance of the work order. in.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT