.....that arises for consideration in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to full pay and allowances as provided under sub-rule (3) of rule 56b of part i of the kerala service rules or not.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents.3. the petitioner, while he was working as a sub engineer at the electrical section, beemanady, was suspended from service as per ext.p1 order dated 30.12.1999 with effect from 29.12.1999 an in connection with a trap case registered by the vigilance and anti- corruption bureau. while continuing under suspension, the petitioner retired from service on superannuation on 31.10.2002. the anti-corruption case charge sheeted against him came to be dismissed as per ext.p2 judgment of the enquiry commissioner and special judge, kozhikode. w.p.(c) no.24526 of 2010 -2- thereafter, the third respondent issued ext.p3 show cause notice to the petitioner directing him to show cause why his suspension period from 30.12.1999 to 31.10.2002 should not be treated as suspension itself. the petitioner submitted ext.p4 explanation to the show cause. on considering the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....is the same in all the three years and since it has been discussed in detail in the order of the tribunal for the assessment year 1986-87, the facts for that year may be noticed as illustrative for all the three years. in the return filed for that year, the assessee claimed depreciation of rs.10,29,581/- in respect of the trucks. in the course of the assessment proceedings, the ao took the view that the claim of depreciation was a mere device to reduce the tax liability arising out of the commission earnings of rs.36.02 lakhs on sale of maruti cars and rs.6.5 lakhs on sale of other vehicles. he noted that there was a steep ingress in the commission income compared to the earlier year in which it was only rs.6.50 lakhs. on further investigation he found that the trucks on which the assessee had claimed depreciation were shown to have been acquired from the sister concern of the assessee and that too in the fag end of the relevant financial year i.e. between 03.03.1986 and 15.03.1986. the trucks were also allowed to have been acquired without making any immediate payment. they were claimed to have been given on hire to m/s. bombay okara cargo ltd. and m/s. bombay okara.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....= = = = = = = = = = = w.p(c) no.1180 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = dated this the 10th day of february, 2014 judgment aggrieved by the action of the respondent bank to enforce the security under a loan transaction as per exts.p9 and p10, the petitioners have come up before this court.2. the petitioners are the successors in interest of one thadathil devassia who availed three credit facilities from the 1st respondent bank in the year 2006 after offering their property as security for the said loan. as there was financial indiscipline, the respondent bank proceeded against their property and finally exts.p9 and p10 were issued.3. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.4. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are entitled to the benefit under agricultural debt waiver and debt relief scheme, 2008 and they are also entitled to one time settlement facility that was extended by the bank to other customers.5. the grievance of the petitioners is that these two facilities were denied to them. it was also submitted by the learned counsel wp(c).1180/13 -:2:- for the petitioners that the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by way of advance sale consideration has not been remitted to the bank account. however, it is stated that, after considering the facts and figures, the bank has expressed willingness to accept the sum of rs.14,00,000/- to be tendered by the petitioner in w.p.(c)no.4068/2014 by keeping the same in an interest bearing 'no-lien' account, so as to facilitate return of the title deeds on a further condition that the sum of rs.9,00,000/- forming part of sale consideration already stated as received by the petitioners in w.p.(c)no.3915/2014 is remitted to the bank on or before 15.3.2014. on effecting the deposit as above, the title deed will be returned to the said petitioners for enabling them to have it handed over to the petitioner in w.p.(c) no.4068/2014. the remaining amount to wipe out the liability, which approximately comes around rs.12,00,000/-, shall be cleared by the petitioners in w.p.(c)no.3915/2014 by way of '5' equal monthly installments, the first of which shall be effected on or before 30.4.2014, to be followed by similar installments to be effected on or before the last working day of succeeding months. the sale scheduled on 11.2.2014 as per ext.p4.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the financial assistance as received under state compassionate assistance policy, to pay the compensation as assessed by the learned tribunals under section 166 or 163 a of the motor vehicles act, except to the extent worked out in accordance with the formulae as detailed hereinabove.”. the matter was later on referred to hon'ble the firs.d.b.of this court in reliance general insurance company limited versus purnima and others.2013(2) r.c.r.(civil) 42, wherein the view taken by this court was affirmed and it was held as under:- “14. we, accordingly, hold that view taken in saroj devi’s case (supra) is correct in law. accordingly, the insurance companies shall not be entitled to the deduction of the amount given to the dependents under the rules of 2006 while calculating compensation payable under the motor vehicles act.”. sethi atul 2014.02.19 09:43 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh fao-2914-2012 -4- therefore, in the instant case, the compensation to be awarded to the claimants should have been calculated in the view of the law laid down in saroj devi's case (supra).as per the record, the last salary of the deceased drawn by the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the state and improvement trust-caveator. in our considered view, the plea raised on behalf of the petitioners is essentially a question of fact which has been objectively gone into by the improvement trust and calls kumar mohinder 2014.02.19 15:16 i attest to the accuracy of this order chandigarh cwp no.2389 of 2014 [3].for no interference by a writ court. at best if there is any factual error in the demarcation carried out by the improvement trust, the remedial steps in this regard can be taken by the state government who may, if there is any substance in the petitioners.factual plea, depute another team of experts to re-demarcate the area. consequently, we dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the state government within three days who shall take an appropriate decision within one week thereafter as to whether a fresh demarcation need to be carried out or not and, if so, the agency to carry out such re-demarcation. if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they shall not be entitled to approach this court though may approach any other alternative forum. learned counsel for the improvement trust assures that till the government takes a.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....appellant. jasbir singh, judge (oral) this appeal has been filed against the order dated 15.01.2014 vide which appeal was dismissed taking note of a fact that after its filing, large number of adjournments were sought on one pretext or the other., on many dates, counsel for the appellant failed to appear in the court. it was stated by learned single judge that a deliberate attempt has been made to delay the matter and on account of that, the writ petition was dismissed. we are not inclined to differ the with the view taken by the learned single judge. no satisfactory justification has been given in the grounds of appeal for not arguing the matter on a large number of dates. be that as it may, we have preferred to hear this appeal on merits. the appellant filed civil writ petition no.18822 of 2012 with a prayer to set aside charge sheet dated 31.5.2012 (annexure p10) and bhardwaj deepak kumar 2014.02.19 15:51 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document letters patent appeal no.213 of 2014 (o&m) 2 for revocation of his suspension order dated 28.12.2010 (annexure p7).it was an allegation against the appellant that he was referring the patients coming to the government.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....took place on 07.09.2009, whereas the fir was registered on 19.09.2009, however, there is nothing on record that the claimant introduced some new facts. the claimant-appellant, pw-2, filed affidavit, ex.pw-2a, before the learned tribunal and reiterated the same by asserting that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of respondent no.2. the appellant was 22 years of age. from the perusal of ex.p-1, the disability certificate, it is evident that he suffered permanent disability of 22%. he suffered fractures of right tibia and fibula and right ankle joint. in the circumstances, particularly in view of the fact that nothing has come on record that the claimant tried to introduce false version, the delay in lodging the fir is not sufficient to deny the claim of the injured when the accident and the injuries suffered, are proved on record. similarly, the compensation awarded towards the non-pecuniary expenses also cannot be said to be on the higher side. sethi atul 2014.02.19 09:42 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh fao-1912-2012 -3- 7. in view of the above discussion, the present appeal is hereby dismissed.8. the statutory.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....bhatt and others (supra); wherein it has been held: "admittedly, the examination in question was held under the 2005 rules. rules 4 and 5 deals with minimum educational qualification as well as prescribed minimum marks for qualifying examination. from a perusal of rule 4 it is apparent that a candidate must 2 have passed the higher secondary school examination or an equivalent examination. rule 5 provides that in the qualifying examination candidates belonging to sc/ st/obc and disabled category should have secured a minimum 40 % marks whereas cut off marks in respect of other categories were fixed 50%. in pursuance of the notification of the vacancies the examination was held on 31.8.2008 in which the petitioners appeared and they were declared successful. admittedly, the petitioners were declared successful in the examination which was held on 31.8.2008. thereafter annexure p6, i.e, the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....to the ownership of the suit property has been left open in the sense that the aspect of ownership was not decided but injunction was granted in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs because they were found to be in use, occupation and possession of the suit property.7. learned counsel for the appellants argued that the impugned judgments are illegal and bad in law inasmuch as, both the issues of lack of joinder of the necessary parties and lack of ownership of the respondentsplaintiffs disentitled the respondents/plaintiffs to the relief of injunction and that these issues have been wrongly held in favour of the respondentsplaintiffs and against the appellant-defendants. it is argued that both sh. mohan lal and sh. peerumal have left behind various other legal heirs and in the absence of such legal heirs as plaintiffs and defendants, the relief of injunction could not have been granted. it is also argued that once the respondents-plaintiffs failed to prove the ownership, the relief of injunction against dispossession ought not to have been granted in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs.8. i cannot agree with the arguments urged on behalf of the appellants inasmuch as, even.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT