.....by way of this petition, under section 439(2) cr.p.c., the petitioner-state seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail allowed to the respondent, vide order dated 28.08.2010 passed by the court of learned additional sessions judge, sangrur in fir no.110 dated 25.07.2010 registered at police station lehra, district sangrur, under sections 452, 506 and 34 ipc. heard. while allowing anticipatory bail to the respondent, the learned additional sessions judge, sangrur, has very specifically stated that no recoveries are to be effected from the respondent as he was never armed with any weapon and, as such, his custodial interrogation was not necessary. during the cours.of hearing, a pointed question was asked from the learned state counsel as to for what purpose presence of the respondent virendra singh adhikari 2014.02.20 09:01 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm-m-36310 of 2013 -2- before the investigating officer is required. the learned state counsel, however, could not point out any circumstance necessitating presence of the respondent before the investigating officer. be that as it may, it is always open to the investigating agency to.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....jurisdiction in the state of haryana and further for issuance of such other appropriate orders as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair play. i have heard leaned counsel for the parties. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that criminal case arising out of fir no.28 dated 11.10.2010 for the offence under sections 302, 307, 323, 148, 149, 120b ipc and sections 25 and 27 of arms act, 1959 has been transferred to the sessions court at fatehabad. he also submits that the complaint has also been filed in respect of incident of the same date anil kumar 2014.02.20 16:24 relating to the involvement of kishan union/kishan morcha. i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm no.m-9050 of 2013 -2- in view of the above, since the trial of the case relating to the incident of the same date has been transferred to the sessions court at fatehabad, it would be appropriate, if inquiry in the complaint and the proceedings emanating therefrom are also transferred to sessions division fatehabad. therefore, complaint no.12 of 2011 titled as ram kishan versus mahender singh and others.which.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of this document crm-m no.467 of 2014 -2- when the petitioner has become proclaimed offender, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise.4. in my view, the absence of the petitioner in india has been properly explained. proclamation has been made as against the petitioner who has been in foreign country.5. considering the above facts and circumstances, i find that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.6. therefore, anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner in the following terms:- in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the investigation officer. he shall join the investigation as and when required by the investigating officer. he shall also comply with the conditions as envisaged under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure.7. petition is allowed. february 18, 2014 (m. jeyapaul) gulati judge gulati sumit 2014.02.19 11:00 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....details of address of parties.3. under normal circumstances it is expected that the counsel who singh prem 2014.02.20 12:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh fao no.1038 of 1996 2 is representing a party still has the details of all the cases entrusted to him, irrespective of the fact that the original files were lost from court's custody. when cases are brought for hearing with the counsel's name present, it is only expected that the representation shall be made by the counsel on behalf of the party to proceed with the case. there is no representation for the appellants in spite of the fact that the name of the counsel is printed in the cause title.4. the appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non- prosecution.5. copy of the order may be dispatched to the parties/counsel whose name appear in the cause title. february 18, 2014 (k.kannan) prem judge singh prem 2014.02.20 12:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....details of address of parties.3. under normal circumstances it is expected that the counsel who singh prem 2014.02.20 12:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh fao no.1638 of 1996 2 is representing a party still has the details of all the cases entrusted to him, irrespective of the fact that the original files were lost from court's custody. when cases are brought for hearing with the counsel's name present, it is only expected that the representation shall be made by the counsel on behalf of the party to proceed with the case. there is no representation for the appellant in spite of the fact that the name of the counsel is printed in the cause title.4. the appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non- prosecution.5. copy of the order may be dispatched to the parties/counsel whose name appear in the cause title. february 18, 2014 (k.kannan) prem judge singh prem 2014.02.20 12:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the evidence of the petitioners has been closed by the reference court in proceedings under s.18 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short 'the act').the order narrates the large number of opportunities granted to them to lead their evidence in support of plea of enhancement of compensation awarded by the land acquisition collector. there has been failure to avail those opportunities. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there was a breach of communication between them and their counsel in the reference court which led to excessive adjournments even where last opportunity was been granted more than once. though the impugned order dated 05th december, 2013 passed by the learned additional district judge, narnaul cannot be faulted but upholding the order would result in non-suiting the petitioners for all times to establish their case for enhancement of compensation for land acquired inter alia on the basis of production of comparable sale deeds involving mittal manju 2014.02.20 12:50 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cr no.1223 of 2014 -2 third party transactions in the local area of the acquisition which may have been executed.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....this petition challenging the order dated 8.8.2013 (annexure p-2) passed by the appellate court whereby application moved by the petitioner under order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 ('cpc' for short).was dismissed. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record available on the file carefully. in the present case, petitioner has filed suit for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction. along with the suit, an application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 cpc was filed by the petitioner seeking interim injunction. the trial court vide order dated 6.3.2013 restrained respondent no.1 from raising construction of the house or boundary wall. the said order was set aside in appeal filed by respondent no.1 vide impugned order dated 8.8.2013 (annexure p-2).singh gurpreet 2014.02.20 13:53 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh civil revision no.6726 of 2013 (o&m) -2- in the present case, the suit property has not been partitioned but it has been noticed by the appellate court that the suit property falls within the abadi area. both the sides have raised construction over their respective portions......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of 2014(o&m) 2 dated 8.5.2012 in original executed by the petitioner and as per the said rent note, the rate of rent was ` 10,000/- per month. in fact, petitioner had sold the property in question to the respondent vide registered sale deed dated 7.5.2012. thereafter, on the next day, petitioner had taken the premises on rent. in the present case, respondent has sought ejectment of the petitioner by moving a petition under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949. during the pendency of the petition, impugned order dated 10.1.2014, whereby assessment of the provisional rent was made by the rent controller, was passed and the same reads under:- “arguments heard on the point for the assessment of provisional rent, it has been averred by the petitioner that vide rent note dated 8.5.2012 respondent has taken the demised house on rent from him @ ` 10,000/- pm. however, the respondent has not paid the rent to the petitioner since may 2012 and is in arrears of rent. on the other hand, the respondent has pleaded in the written reply that the petitioner is not the owner of the demised house and that the respondent is not tenant as per the alleged agreement dated.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....inherited by his legal representatives. the courts below, by relying 2014.02.20 10:50 i am approving this document chandigarh civil revision no.3015 of 2013 2 on the evidence on record, held that the respondent was not in arrears of rent. in fact, the respondent had been earlier paying the rent to ram chander and thereafter, to his wife daya wanti. daya wanti died on 23.7.2006 during the pendency of the ejectment petition. in order to establish his plea that the respondent had been paying rent, reliance was placed on rent receipts ex.r-1 to r-39 i.e.for the period from 1.4.2000 to 1.3.2005 vide which the respondent had deposited rent from 1.8.2006 to 31.3.2007 and 1.4.2011 to 30.9.2011 vide challan forms ex.r-47 and ex.r-48. since the respondent by leading oral as well as documentary evidence had established that he was not in arrears of rent, the ejectment petition filed by the petitioner was liable to be dismissed. no ground for interference by this court is made out. dismissed. (sabina) judge february 18, 2014 anita devi anita 2014.02.20 10:50 i am approving this document chandigarh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....to the date of his retirement, the application was liable to be rejected.7. heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book.8. the fact that the petitioner is a physically disabled person is not disputed by the respondents in the reply filed. certificate issued by the civil surgeon shows that the petitioner was suffering from 40% disability being a case of accessory thumb (r) and small deformed (l) thumb. he was appointed as clerk and joined as such on 21.1.1976. he was promoted as senior assistant on 31.8.2009 and was presently posted at rajpura. as per the service rules, he was to superannuate on 31.12.2012, however, in terms of the policy issued by the government on 8.10.2012, one year extension was granted to the employees. the petitioner opted for the same and was granted extension till 31.12.2012.9. fresh instructions were issued on 20.9.2013 granting one year extension to the employees who were to retire on or after 31.10.2013. the petitioner submitted his option on prescribed performa on 29.11.2013 in the office of sub divisional magistrate, rajpura, which was forwarded to the deputy commissioner on 2.12.2013 and was received on 4.12.2013. despite the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT