.....the police record, it transpires that an fir annexure p-1, no 254 dated november 26, 2013 was registered under sections 66, 66a, 66d, 67, 67 a of it act read with sections 292 and 506 ipc at police station mataur, district s.a.s.nagar, mohali, against petitioner no.1. in view of the allegations against petitioners no.2 and 3 also, they have got an gupta sanjay 2014.02.26 16:55 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm m-43206 of 2013 [2].apprehension of arrest in the said case. the petitioners have moved this petition for grant of pre-arrest bail. petitioner no.1 after arrest has already been released on bail in the present case so the petition qua petitioner no.1 was dismissed as not pressed on december 20, 2013. so far as petitioners no.2 and 3 are concerned, the investigating officer present in the court informs that petitioners no.2 and 3 are not required at this stage, however, on the basis of investigation they might be required. taking into consideration the said circumstances, it is ordered that in case of petitioners no.2 and 3 are required to be arrested in fir no.254 dated november 26, 2013 registered at police station mataur,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....before this court in which the parties have been directed to appear before the lower court to get their statements recorded regarding compromise. otherwise also, the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2013. the trial of the case will take long time. no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case. therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate/duty magistrate, jalandhar. february 25, 2014 (inderjit singh) mamta judge malhotra mamta 2014.02.26 16:13 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....by this court in cwp no.2826 of 1990 titled as j.r.singla and another versus the state of haryana and another, decided on 18.01.2011 (annexure p-9).ordered accordingly. qua petitioners no.2 and 3, counsel for the petitioners contends that liberty may be granted to these petitioners to file a detailed representation claiming the notional fixation of their pay from the date of their promotion and accordingly, the revised pension and prerna datta 2014.02.26 09:59 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh cwp no.3532 of 2014 2 other retiral benefits and arrears for 38 months from the date of service of the legal notice (annexure p-11).which was directed to be decided by this court vide order dated 20.10.2011 passed in cwp no.19763 of 2011 titled as g.r.dewan and another versus state of haryana and another preferred by petitioners no.2 and 3. the said representation shall be filed by the petitioners no.2 and 3 within a period of two weeks' to the additional chief secretary, government of haryana, department of pwd (b&r).haryana-respondent no.1, which may be directed to be considered and decided within some specified time. in view of the above.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of punjab, 2004 (1) ccc396by contending that commercial quantity of contraband i.e.5 kilograms of opium in all had been recovered. perusal of the facts in bhupinder singh's case (supra) would reveal that recovery of narcotic substance had been jointly effected from the petitioners therein as also co-accused and as such, the contention that the same should be divided equally amongst them for determination of the quantity recovered whether small, less than commercial or commercial was negated. undisputedly, in the present case, the recovery that has been effected is not joint rather separate for the petitioner as also co-accused. even separate search and recovery memos were prepared. in amar singh ramjibhai barot versus state of gujrat, 2005 (air) sc4248 the hon'ble supreme court had observed that if two accused are found together but carried contraband and there was no definite evidence as regards conspiracy, the quantity of contraband carried by both the accused could not be added to make it within the meaning of commercial quantity. learned state counsel upon instructions from hc sukhwinder singh would apprise the court that out of 13 prosecution witnesses cited, only 3 have.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....bose, adversus this appeal would arise out of an order dated november 28, 2013 passed ex parte as the appellant despite notice failed to appear. the facts would depict vodafone essar south ltd., a mobile company, entered into an agreement with the appellant for setting up a tower at the appellant’s premises on payment of monthly license fee of rs.3,500/- as agreed in 2007 with a provision for increase at three years’ interval at the rate of 10%. the lady permitted vodafone to install the tower that substantially damaged her building, as claimed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. indus tower ltd., another company, all on a sudden terminated the agreement by contending that they were the successor in interest of vodafone essar, as such they were entitled to terminate the same. in view of such dispute, indus tower applied under section 9 of the arbitration & conciliation act for appropriate protection of their equipment. learned single judge appointed a receiver with a direction to remove the equipment. being aggrieved, the appellant has now come up in appeal. learned counsel appearing for the appellant contends, the appellant had privity of contract with.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioners shall execute a bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b. the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer and the 1st petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer on all mondays between 9.30 am to 11.30 am until further orders. b.a. no. 1317/2014 (d) -3- c. the petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional magistrate. if they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the magistrate. d. the petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioners shall execute a bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b.a. no.1289/2014 (a) -3- b. the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer and the 1st petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer on all mondays and fridays between 9.30 am to 11.30 am until further orders. c. the petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional magistrate. if they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the magistrate. d. the petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....the petitioners shall execute a bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the b.a. no.1318/2014 (d) -3- sureties, the learned magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b. the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer and shall appear before the investigating officer on all mondays and fridays between 9.30 am to 11.30 am until further orders. c. the petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional magistrate. if they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the magistrate. d. the petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or b.a. no.1318/2014 (d) -4- promise.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....in the fir. therefore, i am excluding from consideration the alleged recovery of the stolen watch from the appellant mamun. however, the fact remains that he has been identified by all the three witnesses as one of the persons involved in the commission of the robbery. (21) the robbers stayed in the house of the complainant for quite some time and, therefore, the witnesses had ample opportunity to see them and later identified them, during trial. though pw17 could not tell who had caught her husband, father-in-law and son, she specifically stated that she could never forget the faces of the offenders who had taken away her sleep. she denied the suggestion that there was no light in the house and, therefore she could not have seen the offenders. she specifically stated that all their lights were switched on. this can hardly be disputed that a person who has been subjected to an incident of this nature is unlikely to forget the faces of the offenders for years to come. the incident such as armed robbery do not occur every day in the life of a person and, therefore, a person who witnesses an incident in which armed robbers enter the house in the night, and commit theft.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....if a person who suffers an accident is unable to perform the duties which he was performing before the disability is caused then the disability is to be taken as 100%. in the present case, respondent no.1 was a driver and he cannot perform the functions of a driver on account of amputation of his right leg below his knee and therefore the case will be of 100% disability. i may also in this regard refer to the section 2(l) and section 4(1)(b) of the employee’s compensation act, 1923 as per which the total disablement means such disablement of temporary or permanent nature which incapacitates an employee for doing work which he was capable of performing at the time of accident resulting in disablement.5. in view of the above, there is no merit in the appeal, and the same is therefore dismissed with costs of rs.10,000/- to the respondent no.1. costs be paid within a period of four weeks. february25 2014 ne fao no.497/2012
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT