Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results

Litaka Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)(117)ECC201

labours on some materials in this view of the matter section 2 f gets attracted and it has to be held

Sunshield Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)9STR174

consultant the ld commissioner in exercise of powers vested under section 84 of the finance act 1994 reviewed the order of

Cuddapah Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC146

in para 17 it only proposed to impose penalty under section 112 a b of the customs act as there was

Cmc Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2008)12STJ287CESTAT(Bang.)alore

authority had dropped the proceedings in respect of penalty under section 76 and 78 of the finance act which was reviewed

N.K. Proteins Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

passed on 24 10 02 and whereas the application under section 129d 3 was filed on 21 11 2003 which is

Jaded Siddappa and Co. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2008)9STR239

fit into the description of taxable service in terms of section 65 105 s 5 i further observe that the work

R.R. Construction Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

thousand only rs 100 per day being penalty imposed under section 76 for a period of about 11 months the said

Avt Mccormick Ingredients Pvt. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2008)10STR41

day from the due date of payment of tax under section 76 of the relevant act besides ordering interest to be

Cce Vs. Amardeep Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2007)(218)ELT582TriAhmd

though float cutting would amount to manufacture as defined under section 2 f of the cea 1944 would not change the

international Testing Centre Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)12STJ60CESTATNew(Delhi)

providing technical testing services which fall under clause 106 of section 65 of chapter v of the finance act 1994 prima